The goal of this observational study is to learn about the best indications and techniques regarding endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) in patients with a transmural defect in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract (e.g. anastomotic leakage, Boerhaave syndrome, iatrogenic perforation, other). The main questions it aims to answer are: * What is the success rate of EVT for transmural defects in the upper GI tract? * What are the best indications for EVT in the upper GI tract? (e.g. etiology, patient characteristics, defect characteristics) * What are the best techniques for EVT in the upper GI tract? (e.g. EsoSponge, VACStent, vacuum pressure, intraluminal/intracavitary) Participants will be asked for informed consent to retrospectively and prospectively collect data on EVT.
Transmural defects in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract are defined as a disruption or injury extending through all layers of the oesophageal or gastric wall. These defects can result from various causes, including anastomotic leakage (AL) after oesophago-gastric surgery, iatrogenic perforation, Boerhaave syndrome, or trauma. Transmural defects in the upper GI tract are associated with serious consequences, such as leakage of saliva, gastric contents, and bile into the mediastinum, triggering an inflammatory response. Untreated or inadequately managed mediastinitis can lead to serious morbidity, sepsis, and mortality. Therefore, timely diagnosis and treatment of these defects is crucial. There are several treatment options for transmural defects in the upper GI tract. Conservative management involves a nil by mouth protocol, antibiotics, and (percutaneous) drainage. Endoscopic treatments include self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS), through-the-scope clips, over-the-scope clips, suturing with overstitch, and most recently, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT). Historically, SEMS has been the most used treatment option for transmural defects in the upper GI tract. However, persisting leakage and complications such as dislocation of the stent are not uncommon. Besides that, not all defects are suitable for stenting and additional percutaneous drainage is often necessary, but not always possible. Surgical treatment, such as a re-anastomosis or resection of the gastric conduit with construction of a cervical esophagostomy is generally required in severely septic patients. The choice of treatment depends on factors such as the location and size of the leakage, severity of symptoms, and presence of conduit ischemia or necrosis. In the past decade, EVT has been established as an effective and safe endoscopic treatment option, and it was found to be superior in terms of success rate in AL healing compared to other treatments. However, the implementation of EVT in clinical practice might be hindered by multiple challenges and questions regarding indications and techniques. This study aims to answer remaining questions and bundle expertise, to be able to determine the best indications and techniques of EVT, to reach the full potential of the treatment.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
200
Collection of data from electronic health record
Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc
Amsterdam, Netherlands
RECRUITINGSuccess rate
Successful treatment of EVT for the upper GI defect: closure confirmed via endoscopy
Time frame: 1-3 years
Mortality
30-day and in-hospital mortality, relation to EVT
Time frame: 6 months (due to possible prolonged hospital stay)
Adverse events
(Severe) adverse events related to EVT
Time frame: 6 months
Treatment cycles
Including number of EVT-related endoscopies, number of used sponges/VACStents
Time frame: 6 months
Duration of treatment
Including duration of treatment in days, hospital stay in days, ICU stay in days
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.