VAM00001 is a Phase I/II, randomized, modified double-blind, multi-center study. The purpose of this study is to compare 2 dose levels of Panblok H7 (dose 1 and dose 2 of rHA) with a standard squalene dose of adjuvant MF59 to Panblok H7 (dose 3) unadjuvanted in approximately 700 adult participants in order to select one dose formulation to be used for further clinical development. The randomization ratio will be 3:3:1 for Panblok H7 (dose 1) + MF59, Panblok H7 (dose 2) + MF59, and Panblok H7 (dose 3) unadjuvanted, respectively. Each study group will be stratified into the age groups 18-64 years and ≥ 65 years of age. The study duration for each participant will be approximately 13 months.
The study duration for each participant will be approximately 13 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
581
Pharmaceutical form: suspension for injection Route of administration: intramuscular
Pharmaceutical form: suspension for injection Route of administration: intramuscular
Pharmaceutical form: liquid for injection Route of administration: intramuscular
Centricity Research-Mesa Site Number : 8400006
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Velocity Clinical Research-Hallandale Beach Site Number : 8400026
Hallandale, Florida, United States
Research Centers of America Site Number : 8400024
Hollywood, Florida, United States
Suncoast Research Associates, LLC Site Number : 8400008
Miami, Florida, United States
St Johns Center for Clinical Research Site Number : 8400021
Saint Augustine, Florida, United States
CenExel ACMR (Atlanta Center for Medical Research) Site Number : 8400022
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Velocity Clinical Research Valparaiso Site Number : 8400007
Valparaiso, Indiana, United States
Velocity Clinical Research Site Number : 8400027
Metairie, Louisiana, United States
M3 Wake Research Inc Site Number : 8400010
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Preferred Primary Care Physicians Site Number : 8400015
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
...and 6 more locations
Geometric Mean of Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Antibody (Ab) Titer at Day 22
The HAI antibody was measured by hemagglutination inhibition using horse red blood cells (HIH) measurement method. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was based on the Student t-distribution of log10-transformed values.
Time frame: Day 22
Geometric Mean of Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer at Day 43
The HAI antibody was measured by HIH measurement method. The 95% CI was based on the Student t-distribution of log10-transformed values.
Time frame: Day 43
Geometric Mean Ratio of Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer at Day 22
The HAI antibody was measured by HIH measurement method. The geometric mean ratio of antibody titer at post-vaccination over pre-vaccination is reported. The 95% CI was based on the Student t-distribution of log10-transformed values.
Time frame: Days 1 and 22
Geometric Mean Ratio of Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer at Day 43
The HAI antibody was measured by HIH measurement method. The geometric mean ratio of antibody titer at post-vaccination over pre-vaccination is reported. The 95% CI was based on the Student t-distribution of log10-transformed values.
Time frame: Days 1 and 43
Geometric Mean Ratio of Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer at Day 202
The HAI antibody was measured by HIH measurement method. The geometric mean ratio of antibody titer at post-vaccination over pre-vaccination is reported. The 95% CI was based on the Student t-distribution of log10-transformed values.
Time frame: Days 1 and 202
Geometric Mean Ratio of Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer at Day 387
The HAI antibody was measured by HIH measurement method. The geometric mean ratio of antibody titer at post-vaccination over pre-vaccination is reported. The 95% CI was based on the Student t-distribution of log10-transformed values.
Time frame: Days 1 and 387
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion of Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer at Day 22
The seroconversion was defined as titer \<10 on Day 1 and post-injection titer \>=40 on Day 22 or Day 43; or defined as titer \>=10 on Day 1 and a \>=4-fold increase in titer on Day 22 or Day 43. The 95% CI for the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 22
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion of Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer at Day 43
The seroconversion was defined as titer \<10 on Day 1 and post-injection titer \>=40 on Day 22 or Day 43; or defined as titer \>=10 on Day 1 and a \>=4-fold increase in titer on Day 22 or Day 43. The 95% CI for the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 43
Percentage of Participants With Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer >=1:40 at Day 1
The HAI antibody was measured by HIH measurement method. The 95% CI for the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 1
Percentage of Participants With Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer >=1:40 at Day 22
The HAI antibody was measured by HIH measurement method. The 95% CI for the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 22
Percentage of Participants With Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer >=1:40 at Day 43
The HAI antibody was measured by HIH measurement method. The 95% CI for the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 43
Percentage of Participants With Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer >=1:40 at Day 202
The HAI antibody was measured by HIH measurement method. The 95% CI for the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 202
Percentage of Participants With Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer >=1:40 at Day 387
The HAI antibody was measured by HIH measurement method. The 95% CI for the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 387
Percentage of Participants With Detectable Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer >=1:10 at Day 1
The HAI antibody was measured by HIH measurement method. The 95% CI for the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 1
Percentage of Participants With Detectable Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer >=1:10 at Day 22
The HAI antibody was measured by HIH measurement method. The 95% CI for the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 22
Percentage of Participants With Detectable Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer >=1:10 at Day 43
The HAI antibody was measured by HIH measurement method. The 95% CI for the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 43
Percentage of Participants With Detectable Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer >=1:10 at Day 202
The HAI antibody was measured by HIH measurement method. The 95% CI for the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 202
Percentage of Participants With Detectable Hemagglutination Inhibition Antibody Titer >=1:10 at Day 387
The HAI antibody was measured by HIH measurement method. The 95% CI for the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 387
Geometric Mean of Neutralization Test (NT) Antibody Titer at Day 22
The NT antibody was measured by seroneutralization (SN) measurement method. The 95% CI was based on the Student t-distribution of log10-transformed values.
Time frame: Day 22
Geometric Mean of Neutralization Test Antibody Titer at Day 43
The NT antibody was measured by SN measurement method. The 95% CI was based on the Student t-distribution of log10-transformed values.
Time frame: Day 43
Geometric Mean Ratio of Neutralization Test Antibody Titer at Day 22
The NT antibody was measured by SN measurement method. The geometric mean ratio of antibody titer at post-vaccination over pre-vaccination is reported. The 95% CI was based on the Student t-distribution of log10-transformed values.
Time frame: Days 1 and 22
Geometric Mean Ratio of Neutralization Test Antibody Titer at Day 43
The NT antibody was measured by SN measurement method. The geometric mean ratio of antibody titer at post-vaccination over pre-vaccination is reported. The 95% CI was based on the Student t-distribution of log10-transformed values.
Time frame: Days 1 and 43
Geometric Mean Ratio of Neutralization Test Antibody Titer at Day 202
The NT antibody was measured by SN measurement method. The geometric mean ratio of antibody titer at post-vaccination over pre-vaccination is reported. The 95% CI was based on the Student t-distribution of log10-transformed values.
Time frame: Days 1 and 202
Geometric Mean Ratio of Neutralization Test Antibody Titer at Day 387
The NT antibody was measured by SN measurement method. The geometric mean ratio of antibody titer at post-vaccination over pre-vaccination is reported. The 95% CI was based on the Student t-distribution of log10-transformed values.
Time frame: Days 1 and 387
Percentage of Participants With Neutralization Test Antibody Titer >=1:20, >=1:40, and >=1:80 at Day 22
The NT antibody was measured by SN measurement method. The 95% CI was the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 22
Percentage of Participants With Neutralization Test Antibody Titer >=1:20, >=1:40, and >=1:80 at Day 43
The NT antibody was measured by SN measurement method. The 95% CI was the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 43
Percentage of Participants With >=2 and >=4 Fold Increase in Neutralization Test Antibody Titer at Day 22
The NT antibody was measured by SN measurement method. The 95% CI was the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 22
Percentage of Participants With >=2 and >=4 Fold Increase in Neutralization Test Antibody Titer at Day 43
The NT antibody was measured by SN measurement method. The 95% CI was the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 43
Percentage of Participants With Detectable Neutralization Test Antibody Titer >=1:10 at Day 1
The NT antibody was measured by SN measurement method. The 95% CI was the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 1
Percentage of Participants With Detectable Neutralization Test Antibody Titer >=1:10 at Day 22
The NT antibody was measured by SN measurement method. The 95% CI was the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 22
Percentage of Participants With Detectable Neutralization Test Antibody Titer >=1:10 at Day 43
The NT antibody was measured by SN measurement method. The 95% CI was the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 43
Percentage of Participants With Detectable Neutralization Test Antibody Titer >=1:10 at Day 202
The NT antibody was measured by SN measurement method. The 95% CI was the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 202
Percentage of Participants With Detectable Neutralization Test Antibody Titer >=1:10 at Day 387
The NT antibody was measured by SN measurement method. The 95% CI was the single percentage was based on the Clopper-Pearson method. The percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.
Time frame: Day 387
Number of Participants With Immediate Unsolicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study vaccine, whether or not considered related to the study vaccine. An unsolicited AE is an observed AE that does not fulfill the conditions of solicited reactions, that is, pre-listed in the case report form in terms of diagnosis and onset window post-vaccination. Systemic AEs are all AEs that were not injection or administration site reactions. Immediate events are recorded to capture medically relevant unsolicited systemic AEs which occur within the first 30 minutes after vaccination.
Time frame: Up to 30 minutes after each vaccination
Number of Participants With Solicited Injection Site Reactions and Systemic Reactions
An adverse reaction (AR) is any noxious and unintended response to a study vaccine related to any dose. A solicited reaction is an "expected" AR (sign or symptom) observed and reported under the conditions (nature and onset) pre-listed in the protocol and case report form. An injection/administration site reaction is an AR at and around the injection/administration site of the investigational medical product. Systemic ARs are all ARs that are not injection or administration site reactions.
Time frame: Up to 7 days after each vaccination
Number of Participants With Unsolicited AEs
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study vaccine, whether or not considered related to the study vaccine. An unsolicited AE is an observed AE that does not fulfill the conditions of solicited reactions, that is, pre-listed in the case report form in terms of diagnosis and onset window post-vaccination.
Time frame: Up to 21 days after each vaccination
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESIs) and Medically Attended Adverse Events (MAAEs)
An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death or is life-threatening or requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is an important medical event. An AESI (serious or non-serious) is one of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's study vaccine or program, for which ongoing monitoring and rapid communication by the investigator to the Sponsor can be appropriate. An MAAE is a new onset or a worsening of a condition that prompts the participant to seek unplanned medical advice at a physician's office or Emergency Department.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: From first dose vaccine administration (Day 1) until 12 months after the last dose administration, 387 days