This is a single-center, randomized, SHAM-controlled, parallel assignment, double-masked,8-week interventional study among children aged 8-17 years (not yet 18 years old) of age with obesity and asthma. (n=60), recruited from Duke Health Center Creekstone, to test the effectiveness of inspiratory muscle rehabilitation (IMR) as an acceptable add-on intervention to reduce dyspnea (feeling short-of-breath or breathless) and to promote greater activity in children with obesity and asthma. Clinic to test the effectiveness of inspiratory muscle rehabilitation (IMR) as an acceptable add-on intervention to reduce dyspnea (feeling short-of-breath or breathless) and to promote greater activity in children with obesity
Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease affecting roughly 8% of US children, and is characterized by intermittent symptoms of breathlessness/dyspnea, chest tightness, wheeze, and cough. Although asthma is currently the most common chronic disease in childhood, there are no cures and the underlying etiologies of the various asthma phenotypes still remain unclear. More than half of the 7-8 million pediatric asthma patients in the US have one or more exacerbations each year. A sizable component of asthma's impact on children stems from the recurrent mild-moderate symptoms that cause impaired quality-of-life, activity limitation and exercise avoidance. Uncontrolled asthma frequently disrupts quality of life and is the #1 reason that children miss school and avoid physical activity. Among children with asthma, obesity is a major risk factor for disruptive asthma symptoms. Asthma is conventionally thought to stem from inflammation in the lower airways. However, despite the widespread availability of anti-inflammatory inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) drugs, uncontrolled asthma remains extremely common and appears to be less effective in obese patients. Pediatric obesity is a risk factor for both new-onset asthma and asthma that has more frequent and refractory symptoms. We found that pediatric obesity increases the risk for spirometry-confirmed asthma by nearly 30%. The mechanistic link between obesity and uncontrolled asthma remains unknown. In general, asthmatic children who are obese experience a reduced response to daily preventative ICS. Pediatric obesity has repeatedly been associated with more frequent and severe asthma symptoms, greater airflow obstruction, need for more frequent albuterol use, and more frequent and severe exacerbations. A consistent finding across most studies of children with both obesity and asthma has been an obesity-related increase in the frequency of chronic asthma symptoms (specifically dyspnea) and asthma-related activity limitation. We found that the greater asthma symptoms seen in obese versus non-obese children were primarily attributable to excess symptoms of dyspnea. Obese adolescents with asthma most commonly report that dyspnea is their most problematic asthma symptom. We hypothesize that the increased asthma symptom reporting in obese asthma, stems not from airway inflammation but rather obesity-related impaired breathing mechanics (i.e. chest restriction). Because of the reduced response to conventional asthma drugs and the resulting excess symptoms, there is a critical need for new treatment approaches for obese children with asthma that is guided by improved mechanistic understanding of this difficult phenotype.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
60
Each participant will be provided a PrO2™ device and trained on its use as well as its accompanying PrO2 Fit™ app. The PrO2™ is a flow-resistive device that provides inspiratory resistance via a fixed 2mm orifice and has Bluetooth connectivity to most IOS/Android devices or Mac/Windows computers. The PrO2™ device and app allows for both 100% adherence monitoring and immediate user biofeedback. Participants will be instructed to inspire forcefully through PrO2™ until the device signals that the user has achieved the target resistance (via audible alarm and visible light signal). The research team will implement biofeedback signals at a specific inspiratory resistance to provide precise and individualized training target. Successful IMR repetitions will require that subjects achieve a pressure target that is 60% of their MIP.
Participants in the control intervention will also use the same PrO2™ device but at a reduced peak resistance of 15% MIP. The research team will implement biofeedback signals at a specific inspiratory resistance to provide precise and individualized training target. Successful IMR repetitions will require that subjects achieve a pressure target that is 15% of their MIP for each repetition
Duke Healthy Lifestyles Clinic
Durham, North Carolina, United States
RECRUITINGAdherence to active IMR Adherence to active IMR
Prevalence of IMR completion (actual / planned reps over intervention period) in active IMR group
Time frame: approximately 2 months
Participant satisfaction among active IMR participants
Prevalence of agree or strongly agree to question of satisfaction with active IMR
Time frame: approximately 2 months
Prevalence of completer status
Completion of study Visit 3
Time frame: approximately 2 months
Demonstrate changes in inspiratory muscle function with IMR.
Change in maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) over intervention period
Time frame: approximately 2 months
Demonstrate changes in respiratory symptoms following IMR.
Participants are asked every week during the follow up calls if there are any health improvements
Time frame: approximately 2 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.