This study is trying to find out whether performing a hybrid aerobic-resistance exercise training program (titled PRIME: Peripheral Remodeling via Intermittent Muscular Exercise) results in better health outcomes than the traditional exercise training program (called COMBO) that is used in individuals with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Participants will be randomized (like the flip of a coin) to either PRIME (investigational) or the traditional exercise program (standard of care).
This study is a two-arm, prospective randomized clinical trial with participants randomized, in a 1:1 ratio to 4 weeks of either standard progressive whole-body aerobic plus resistance training (COMBO) or PRIME training (Phase 1), followed by 8 weeks of progressive whole-body COMBO assigned to all participants (Phase 2). The objective of this study is to determine whether PRIME exercise training can outperform traditional (COMBO) exercise training to improve outcomes in HFrEF patients. The study aims to test 92 HFrEF patients (46 randomized to PRIME and 46 to COMBO training) over a 5-year period. Data will be collected at each visit and patients will return for a 6-month follow up from the date of the final visit.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
92
PRIME is a a 'hybrid' aerobic-resistance (cardio and weights) program designed to target all major muscle groups and address the muscle limitations responsible for reduced fitness in the elderly. This occurs by minimizing the central limitations to more traditional exercise by delivering an ideal exercise stimulus to muscles in a way in which the heart is not a limiting factor. Each exercise involves contractions of specific isolated muscle groups with a moderate load, defined as 40%-50% of their maximal voluntary capacity.
COMBO training includes both aerobic ("cardio") and resistance ("weightlifting") exercises. The aerobic component will be done on the stationary bicycle at 10-15 min duration at a target exercise intensity of 40-50% of VO2peak. This will feel like an intensity that is fairly light to somewhat hard, progressing gradually according to tolerance up to 20 mins. Intensity will be adjusted so that the difficulty remains in the target zone. The resistance component involves eight exercises, two sets of 10 repetitions, initially prescribed at 50-60% 1 repetition max. Subject will lift about half of their predicted maximal strength, 10 times, on 2 separate occasions with a rest between. Thereafter, the difficulty will be increased by approximately 10% when difficulty drops below the target range.
University of Virginia, Department of Kinesiology
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
RECRUITINGVO2peak
Change in cardiorespiratory fitness (peak oxygen consumption \[V̇O2peak\]) after 12 weeks of training. The primary null hypothesis will test if mean change in V̇O2peak after 12 weeks of training is the same for subjects who initially undergo 4 weeks of PRIME before undergoing 8 weeks of progressive whole-body COMBO, versus subjects who undergo the whole 12 weeks of progressive COMBO. The alternative hypothesis is that the mean change in V̇O2peak after 12 weeks of training is not the same for subjects who initially undergo 4 weeks of PRIME training before undergoing 8 weeks of progressive COMBO, versus subjects who undergo the whole 12 weeks of progressive COMBO. Secondary endpoints include blood pressure, vascular function \[arterial stiffness, endothelial function (FMD)\] muscle characteristics and histochemistry, blood chemistry, physical fitness testing, quality of life questionnaires, and adherence.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Muscular fitness
Evaluated using 1 repetition maximal strength \[1RM\] measured in kg units
Time frame: 40- weeks
Physical Function
Evaluated by the Senior Fitness Test scores \[SFT\], measured in percentile units.
Time frame: 40- weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.