This phase II/III trial compares the effect of usual treatment approach alone (FOLFOX or CAPOX after chemoradiation) with using FOLFIRINOX after chemoradiation in patients with stage II-III rectal cancer. Combination chemotherapy regimens, such as FOLFIRINOX (folinic acid (leucovorin), fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin), FOLFOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin), or CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) use more than one anticancer drug that work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. FOLFOX or CAPOX are used after chemoradiation as usual treatment for rectal cancer. Giving FOLFIRINOX after chemoradiation may increase the response rate for the primary rectal tumor and lead to higher rates of clinical complete response (and thus a chance to avoid surgery) compared to FOLFOX or CAPOX after chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate and compare the clinical complete response (cCR) rates in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant long-course radiotherapy (LCRT) followed by neoadjuvant modified leucovorin fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) versus neoadjuvant LCRT followed by neoadjuvant modified leucovorin , fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6)/CAPOX (Phase II). II. To evaluate and compare disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant LCRT followed by neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX versus neoadjuvant LCRT followed by neoadjuvant mFOLFOX6/CAPOX. (Phase III) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate and compare organ-preservation-time (OPT) between two treatment arms. II. To evaluate and compare time to distant metastasis between two treatment arms. III. To evaluate and compare overall survival (OS) between two treatment arms. IV. To evaluate and compare toxicity profiles of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) between two treatment arms. V. To evaluate and compare sustained cCR between two treatment arms. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE: I. Evaluation of circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) kinetics during neoadjuvant therapy \& surveillance and to correlate with radiographic, pathologic, and clinical outcomes. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: LCRT: Patients undergo long-course chemoradiation therapy for up to 5 weeks. CONSOLIDATION: Patients receive either FOLFOX (consisting of leucovorin IV over 2 hours on day 1 of each cycle, fluorouracil IV bolus over 2-4 minutes and IV continuous infusion over 46-48 hours on day 1 of each cycle, and oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1 of each cycle or CAPOX consisting of capecitabine orally on days 1-14 of each cycle, and oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1 of each cycle. Treatment with FOLFOX repeats every 2 weeks for up to 8 cycles (16 weeks) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Treatment with CAPOX repeats every 3 weeks for up to 5 cycles (15 weeks) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: LCRT: Patients undergo long course chemoradiation therapy for up to 5 weeks. CONSOLIDATION: Patients receive FOLFIRINOX (consisting of leucovorin IV over 2 hours on day 1 of each cycle, fluorouracil IV continuous infusion over 46-48 hours on day 1 of each cycle, oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 1 of each cycle, and irinotecan IV over 30-90 minutes on day 1 of each cycle) Treatment with FOLFIRINOX repeats every 2 weeks for up to 8 cycles (16 weeks) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients undergo CT scan, MRI scan, and collection of blood samples, and sigmoidoscopy throughout the trial and undergo biopsy during screening.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
760
Given PO
Given IV
Given IV
Given IV
Given IV
Receive LCRT
undergo CT
undergo MRI
undergo sigmoidoscopy
undergo biopsy
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Anchorage Associates in Radiation Medicine
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Alaska Breast Care and Surgery LLC
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Alaska Oncology and Hematology LLC
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Clincal Complete Response (cCR) Rates (Phase II)
Defined as the number of patients who achieved cCR at the end of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) divided by number of patients included in the analysis population. This endpoint will be assessed within 8-12 weeks after completion of TNT. If there is a cCR, then the patient will be counted in the numerator. If there is a near-complete response (nCR) then a re-evaluation within 4-8 weeks will be performed. If an nCR evolved to a cCR, then the patient will be counted in the numerator. Otherwise, the patient will be deemed as NOT achieving cCR status. Difference of proportions test will be conducted to compare cCR rate in the experimental arm to cCR rate in the control arm. If the one-sided p-value of the comparison is \< 0.05 (difference in proportion \> 9.3%), then we will conclude the cCR rate in the experimental arm is superior to the control arm.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Disease-free survival (DFS) rate (Phase III)
Defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first occurrence of the following events: death due to all causes, tumor that recurs locally after an R0 total mesorectal excision (TME), tumor that regrows after an initial apparent clinical and radiological CR and cannot be surgically removed with an R0 TME, and M1 disease diagnosed at any point after the initiation of treatment. Will be estimated, in each arm, using the method of Kaplan-Meier and compared by a stratified Cox regression model.
Time frame: From date of randomization, assessed up to 5 years
Organ-preservation time (OPT)
Defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of the first occurrence of the following events: TME performed or attempted, tumor that regrows after an initial apparent clinical and radiological complete response (CR) and death due to all causes. Will be estimated, in each arm, using the method of Kaplan-Meier and treatment compared by a stratified Cox regression model.
Time frame: From date of randomization, assessed up to 5 years
Time to distant metastasis (TDM)
Will be estimated, in each arm, using the method of Kaplan-Meier and compared by a stratified Cox regression model.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first documented distant metastasis, assessed up to 5 years
Overall survival (OS)
Will be estimated, in each arm, using the method of Kaplan-Meier and compared by a stratified Cox regression model.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of death due to all causes, assessed up to 5 years
Incidence of adverse events (AEs)
Defined as the proportion of patients experienced at least one Grade 3, Grade 4, or Grade 5 of each type of AE. The overall adverse event rates for grade 3 or higher adverse events will be compared between two treatment groups using Chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test if the data in the contingency table is sparse).
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Sustained cCR
Defined as a binary endpoint with two statuses: responder and non-responder. Responders are defined as those evaluable patients who achieved at least one of the following within 3 years after randomization: * Had TME and the pathologic outcome is pathologic complete response * Had a cCR, were on watch and wait (WW) with no regrowth and no distant metastases * Had nCR, were on WW with no regrowth and no distant metastases Non-responders are defined as all patients who did not meet the criteria as noted above for the responders.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Alaska Women's Cancer Care
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Anchorage Oncology Centre
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Katmai Oncology Group
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Providence Alaska Medical Center
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Kingman Regional Medical Center
Kingman, Arizona, United States
...and 675 more locations