The primary objective of this study is to examine the optimization of Reverse Shouder Arthroplasty implant position between GPS and conventional techniques. The secondary objective is to assess the effect of implant position using GPS vs. conventional techniques on ROM and patient reported outcomes. Long-term follow-up to 10 years with minimum 2 year follow-up for patients.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
260
Dijklander Ziekenhuis
Hoorn, Netherlands
RECRUITINGSST-12
Shoulder Simple Test (SST) - 12 questions with yes/no responses that measure shoulder pain and function from a patient's perspective - 12 yes corresponds to 100%
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 per year
SPADI
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) -13 questions assessing about pain scale (5 questions) and disability scale (8 questions) where 0 indicates no pain/no difficulty and 10 indicates worst pain imaginable/so difficult it requires help while performin these activities
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 per year
Constant
Constant Shoulder Score - 100 points scale about pain, Activities of daily living, Strength test, and Range of Motions questions about shoulder where 100 % corresponds to the highest pain
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 per year
ASES
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) - 100 points scale about shoulder pain and performance evaluation in activities of daily living where 100 indicates the best shoulder condition
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 per year
UCLA
University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLA) - 5 Items score which combines both physician (3 items) and patient assessment (2 items) whith a total range from 0-35 where 0 indicates worse shoulder function and 35 better shoulder function outcomes
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 per year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.