Aminoglycoside (AG) antibiotics have been in clinical use since the 1960s for treating various infections. The main safety concern related to AG use is nephrotoxicity. Based on validated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) principles shown to predict efficacy, AG dosing has shifted over the past 2 decades from multiple daily dosing to extended-interval dosing, with concomitant reduction in nephrotoxicity. Currently, AG daily dose is calculated according to the patients' adjusted body weight, assuming a common minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) value. We hypothesize that once pathogen identity and actual MIC become available, AG daily doses may be further adjusted, using the same PK-PD indices. In order to investigate this hypothesis, we are conducting a prospective clinical study in which AG doses will be adjusted based on patient- and pathogen-specific factors, while assessing efficacy and safety.
Intervention for all eligible patients: calculation of Cmax/MIC based on MIC determination and timely peak level determination performed 30 minutes after the first or second AG dose following pathogen identity and MIC availability (as Individual timely monitoring is essential for individual dose adjustment, this will require one additional blood sample to routine clinical practice). If a peak-level monitoring is not available, Cmax will be assessed using commonly used pharmacokinetic prediction tools (equations/calculators. 1. If Cmax/MIC=8-12 - no intervention (aminoglycoside dose unchanged). 2. If Cmax/MIC\>12 - decreasing AG dose accordingly, based on clinical calculators, to achieve target Cmax/MIC\~10; 3. If Cmax/MIC\<8 - increasing AG dose accordingly, based on clinical calculators, to achieve target Cmax/MIC\~10; If the calculated dose is larger than acceptable AG dosing, an infectious diseases physician will be consulted for need for alternative therapy. 4. If AG dose has been adjusted, ascertaining PK/PD target attainment (repeat timely peak level determination following dose adjustment). 5. Monitoring clinical and microbiological course and outcomes: 5.1 Clinical efficacy microbiological and clinical cure, in-hospital mortality 5.2 Safety - renal function during therapy, at end of therapy and at discharge or at day 7 after end of therapy, whichever is earlier. Any deterioration in renal function compared with baseline will be categorized according to the RIFLE criteria. 5.3 Aminoglycoside dosing data (proportion end extent of dose adjustments performed)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
151
Eligible patients may have the aminoglycoside dose adjusted based on pathogen MIC, to attain the PK/PD target of Cam/MIC\~10 (8-12)
Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center
Jerusalem, Israel
RECRUITINGEfficacy outcome
proportion of patients where treatment failure was suspected and attributed to AG dose reduction
Time frame: up to 1 week after end of therapy
Renal outcome
Proportion of patients fulfilling RIFLE criteria (any category) baseline
Time frame: up to 1 week after end of therapy
Renal outcome
Mean serum creatinine change at end of therapy vs. baseline
Time frame: up to 1 week after end of therapy
Aminoglycoside dosing outcomes:
Proportion of patients where AG dose was adjusted based on PK-PD parameters
Time frame: up to 1 week after end of therapy
Aminoglycoside dosing outcomes:
Mean change in AG dose following adjustment
Time frame: up to 1 week after end of therapy
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.