Pilot Testing of an Equity Focused and Trauma-informed Communication Intervention During Family-centered Rounds

Duke University90 enrolled

Overview

Development and pilot testing of a clinician coaching communication intervention to improve communication between medical teams and caregivers (parents, family members) of children in the hospital. Our team is specifically focused on improving partnership, respect, and collaboration with Black and Latinx caregivers of children in the hospital by incorporating elements from trauma-informed care and racial equity into a communication intervention. The investigators will explore the impact of this intervention on communication quality, caregiver trust, caregiver satisfaction, and hospital readmissions.

When admitted to the hospital, Black and Latino(a/x) children are at greater risk of medical errors, surgical complications, longer, more-costly hospital stays, and mortality compared to White children. Although many factors play a role, poor clinician communication likely contributes to these disparities in health outcomes. Across settings, including our preliminary work in the inpatient pediatric environment, Black and Latino(a/x) patients have been shown to experience worse communication quality as evidenced by less patient and family-centered, empathic, and respectful communication as compared to White patients. Poor communication can make the hospital stay more stressful for caregivers, with implications for caregiver and child health and recovery from illness. While prior experiences of discrimination and trauma can negatively affect clinician-caregiver communication, current best practices in clinician communication fail to incorporate equity and trauma-informed principles. In this study the investigators will test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a pilot randomized waitlist control trial of an equity focused and trauma-informed clinician coaching communication intervention that aims to teach clinicians skills to improve communication in areas where inequities are known to exist (i.e. respect, partnership) and incorporate principles of equity (i.e affirmation) and trauma-informed care. To do this, first the investigators will co-develop and refine a clinician coaching communication intervention with iterative feedback from Black and Latino(a/x) caregivers as well as clinicians of children in the hospital. Second, the investigators will examine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of the intervention. The investigators will randomize 10 clinicians to an intervention or waitlist group; clinicians in the intervention group will receive the intervention immediately, while clinicians in the waitlist group will initially serve as the control arm then receive the intervention to provide feasibility and acceptability data. The investigators will assess the feasibility of recruiting and collecting data as well as acceptability of the intervention by clinicians. The investigators will explore preliminary efficacy for the effect of the intervention on communication, caregiver satisfaction, caregiver trust, and hospital readmissions.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Eligibility criteria for caregivers: * Adults (18 years of age or older) * Proficient in English or Spanish * Capable of providing informed consent * Identified as a primary caregiver (parent or guardian) of a hospitalized Black or Latino(a/x) child on the general pediatrics team. * We will exclude caregivers of children undergoing evaluation for child abuse/neglect or other cases in which the medical team believes family-centered rounds are not appropriate. Eligibility criteria for clinicians: * pediatric attending physicians who provide hospital care to children at Duke Children's Hospital. * Capable of providing informed consent * We will exclude clinicians who do not provide hospital care to children on the general pediatrics team.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Feasibility measured by enrollment rate of clinicians and caregivers combined

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Feasibility measured by the rate of complete data collection by caregivers

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Fidelity measured by the rate of intervention elements completed per encounter by clinicians

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Acceptability of the intervention as measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

The AIM has 4 items. Each with response of 5 point likert scale (completely disagree to completely agree). The Investigator will assign a score of 1 to completely disagree and a 5 to completely agree for each item. To calculate the AIM the Investigator average together the responses to the 4 items.

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Appropriateness measured by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)

The IAM has 4 items. Each with response of 5 point likert scale (completely disagree to completely agree). The Investigator will assign a score of 1 to completely disagree and a 5 to completely agree for each item. To calculate the AIM the Investigator average together the responses to the 4 items.

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Feasibility measured by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)

The FIM has 4 items. Each with response of 5 point likert scale (completely disagree to completely agree). The Investigator will assign a score of 1 to completely disagree and a 5 to completely agree for each item. To calculate the AIM the Investigator average together the responses to the 4 items.

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Number of Clinician rapport-building statements