Many brain-injured patients referred for outpatient rehabilitation have difficulties with planning, problems solving, and reasoning. These difficulties can be characterized as executive deficits, which can vary from relatively mild to rather severe. Executive deficits lead to real-life everyday disorganization and difficulties in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL tasks). Goal Management Training (GMT) is a successful treatment for executive deficits and helps to structure activities in daily life. GMT entails learning and applying an algorithm, in which a daily task is subdivided into multiple steps to handle executive difficulties of planning, and problem solving. Patients are taught compensatory strategies not to strengthen the executive functions, but to enable them to minimize disabilities and participation problems and to function more independently in daily life. The currently implemented GMT treatment in the Netherlands is aimed at relearning two specific tasks. However, to adopt the GMT strategy and ensure maximal profitability for patients, they have to learn to use the algorithm in different situations and tasks, which requires a comprehensive, time-consuming and thus labour-intensive treatment. Along with this, brain games become increasingly attractive as an (add-on) intervention, most notably in an effort to develop home-based personalized care, and because of their machine learning algorithms which tailors the game to the level of the individual player. Until now, however, the rationale behind brain games is based on what can be considered the restorative approach (i.e. strengthening of executive problems) rather than practicing compensatory strategies, with no transfer to improvements in daily life functioning. The present study fills a gap in the literature by investigating a new developed treatment that incorporates GMT and a treatment supporting strategy game in a pilot sample of brain injured patients. The primary objective of this pilot study is to obtain an efficacy estimate and investigate the feasibility of GMT with a new game that incorporates strategy training in improving executive functions in a pilot sample of brain-injured patients. This study investigates usability and acceptability of our new developed GMT treatment to brain-injured patients in the chronic phase (\>3 months post-onset), and obtains an efficacy estimate, focusing on transfer of treatment effects to untrained (instrumental) activities of daily living. Chronic brain-injured patients will be allocated to the game-supported GMT treatment or to an information group using block randomization. It will be an assessor blind study in which researchers responsible for assessing or analyzing data will be blind for the received treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
21
The investigational treatment is based on a compensatory strategy training named Goal Management Training (GMT). The investigational treatment will include GMT in combination with a compensatory strategy game which allows the patient to learn and apply the algorithm of GMT in a safe and controlled environment. This means that the multiple steps of the GMT will be learned during the treatment sessions under guidance of a therapist as well as in their own home environment by using the compensatory strategy game.
In the information group, patients are informed about non-specific consequences of acquired brain injury, aimed to increase patient's insight into their condition and with that improving functioning. The program consists of the following subjects: 1) cause of brain injury, 2) information processing and attention, 3) memory, 4) planning and performance, 5) fatigue, 6) changes in emotion and behavior and 7) processing and adjustments.
Klimmendaal Revalidatiespecialisten
Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands
Change from baseline performance on untrained IADL tasks immediately after the intervention
Standardized scale measuring performance of an untrained IADL task (int. al. the percent change in the number of correct steps) before (baseline) and after treatment (post treatment). The untrained IADL tasks will be divided into multiple steps using the GMT method. These steps will be assessed using four categories: 1) additional/unrelated; 2) absent/incomplete; 3) questionable/ineffective; 4) competent/correct, using task-specific assessment forms.
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Change from baseline Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) on untrained task performance immediately after the intervention
Quantifying the subjective improvement on untrained task performance
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Change from baseline subjective strategy use immediately after the intervention
The subjective experience of strategy use in daily life and during the performance of IADL tasks, as measured by two short self-reported questionnaires.
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Change from baseline participation as measured by the USER-P immediately after the intervention
"Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation - Participation" (USER-P)
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Change from baseline executive functioning as measured with the Zoo map test immediately after the intervention
Zoo map test
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Change from baseline executive functioning as measured with the modified six elements test immediately after the intervention
Modified six elements test
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Change from baseline executive functioning as measured with the Brixton immediately after the intervention
Brixton
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints as measured with the Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ) immediately after the intervention
Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ)
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Change from baseline executive functioning as measured with the OxMET-NL immediately after the intervention
Oxford Multiple Errands Test - Dutch version (OxMET-NL)
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Change from baseline subjective executive complaints immediately after the intervention
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function- Adult Version (BRIEF-A)
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Change from baseline Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) on treatment goals immediately after the intervention
Quantifying the achievement of treatment goals, only measured in the game-supported GMT group.
Time frame: Baseline and immediately after the intervention
System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire
To evaluate the usability of the game-supported GMT treatment.
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Technological Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire
To evaluate the user-acceptance of the game-supported GMT treatment.
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.