Elranatamab is a bispecific antibody: binding of elranatamab to CD3-expressing T-cells and BCMA-expressing multiple myeloma cells causes targeted T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity. The main purpose of the study is to evaluate if the combination of Elranatamab, Daratumumab and Lenalidomide offers superior clinical benefit compared with the combination of Daratumumab, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in people with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. There are 2 parts to this study. Part 1 will characterize the safety and tolerability of elranatamab in combination with daratumumab and lenalidomide or in combination with lenalidomide and will identify the optimal dose(s) of the combination regimen. Part 2 of the study will evaluate the minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate and the progression free survival (PFS) of the combination of elranatamab, daratumumab, and lenalidomide compared with the combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,116
Part 1 Dose Level 1 is not randomized. All other cohorts are randomized.
Part 1 Dose Level 1 is not randomized. All other cohorts are randomized.
Part 1 Dose Level 1 is not randomized. All other cohorts are randomized.
Randomized
Pindara Private Hospital
Benowa, Queensland, Australia
RECRUITINGSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
RECRUITINGEpworth Freemasons
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
RECRUITINGThe Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Part 1 Dose Limiting Toxicity
Time frame: From the first dose of elranatamab/first full dose in combination with EDR until 28 days (+/- visit window) from the first administration of elranatamab with daratumumab and lenalidomide
Part 2: Progression free survival per IMWG
Time frame: From randomization up to 97 months.
Part 2: Minimal Residual Disease negativity rate
Time frame: At 12 months after randomization
Overall Survival
Time frame: From date of randomization up to 97 months
Overall minimal residual disease negativity rate
Time frame: From date of randomization up to 97 months
Sustained MRD negativity rate (Part 2)
Time frame: From date of randomization up to 97 months
Duration of minimal residual disease negativity (Part 2)
Time frame: From date of minimal residual disease negative status up to 97 months
PFS by investigator
Time frame: From date of randomization up to 97 months
PFS2 by investigator (Part 2)
Time frame: From the date of randomization up to 97 months
Objective Response Rate
Time frame: From the date of randomization up to 97 months
Complete Response Rate
Time frame: From the date of randomization up to 97 months
Time to Response
Time frame: From the date of randomization to date of confirmed objective response up to 97 months
Duration of Response
Time frame: From the date of confirmed objective response up to 97 months
Duration of Complete Response
Time frame: From the date of confirmed complete response up to 97 months
Frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events
Time frame: From the date of first dose of study intervention up to 97 months
Frequency of abnormal laboratory results
Time frame: From the date of first dose of study intervention up to 97 months
Pharmacokinetics of elranatamab when used in the elranatamab + daratumumab + lenalidomide or elranatamab + lenalidomide combinations
Predose and post dose concentrations of elranatamab
Time frame: From date of first dose of study intervention up to 97 months
Incidence of Anti-Drug Antibody against elranatamab
Immunogenicity of elranatamab
Time frame: From date of first dose of study intervention up to 97 months
Pharmacokinetics of daratumumab and lenalidomide when used in the elranatamab+daratumumab+lenalidomide or elranatamab+lenalidomide combinations (Part 1)
Predose concentrations of daratumumab and lenalidomide
Time frame: From date of first dose of study intervention up to 97 months
Health-related quality of life by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (Part 2)
Higher scores on the functional scales represent higher levels of functioning. Higher scores on the global health status/quality of life scale represent higher health status/quality of life. Higher scores on the symptom scales/items represent a greater presence of symptoms.
Time frame: From date the informed consent is signed up to 97 months
Health-related quality of life by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire -Myeloma 20 (Part 2)
Higher scores on the functioning subscales (body image, future perspective) represent higher levels of functioning, whereas higher scores on the symptom subscales (disease symptoms, side effects) represent a greater presence of symptoms
Time frame: From date the informed consent is signed up to 97 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
QEII Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
RECRUITINGNova Scotia Health Authority
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
RECRUITINGPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
RECRUITINGPeking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGFujian Medical University Union Hospital
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGSouthern Medical University Nanfang Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
NOT_YET_RECRUITING...and 75 more locations