To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a remotely delivered intervention for civilians and service members with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) who have difficulty recognizing and regulating their emotions. Post-treatment outcomes of interest include emotional self-awareness and regulation, resiliency, and affective symptoms.
This Phase I proof of principle pilot study of the Building Emotional Self-awareness Teletherapy (BEST) intervention will use a quasi-experimental, non-randomized, one-group pretest-posttest design with a double pretest and a 3-month follow-up in approximately 40 participants with mTBI (\~20 civilians and \~20 service members). Study objectives are to explore the feasibility and early efficacy of BEST to improve psychological health outcomes in civilian and Service Member (SM) participants with mTBI who have alexithymia (poor emotional self-awareness) and emotion dysregulation. We anticipate BEST will have good feasibility and acceptability in both civilian and service member participants, and post-treatment assessments will show significant improvements in alexithymia, emotion regulation, resiliency, and affective symptoms.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
40
8 one-on-one teletherapy training sessions to enhance emotional skills. Teletherapy sessions will last approximately 60-90 minutes
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Change in Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20)
This is a 20-item self report questionnaire comprised of three sub-constructs (Difficulty Identifying feelings, Difficulty Describing feelings, Externally-oriented Thinking). The full scale range is 20-100 (higher scores indicate higher (worse) alexithymia). Subscales are summed to compute a total score.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24
Change in Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS)
Objective, performance-based measure of emotional awareness and labeling. Short hypothetical scenarios are presented and participants are asked to describe how they and others would feel in the context of the scenarios. More discrete emotions earn more points (e.g., "sad" scores better than "bad"). Participants' responses are scored with an electronic system, removing human bias and interpretation. The LEAS has parallel forms (A and B), which will alternate at testing sessions.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24
Change in Difficulty with Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Using a 5-point Likert scale, participants rate the frequency they utilize self-regulation behaviors in response to general emotional distress. There are 6 subscales: Lack of Emotional Awareness; Lack of Emotional Clarity; Difficulties Controlling Impulsive Behaviors when Distressed; Difficulties Engaging in Goal-Directed Behavior when Distressed; Non-acceptance of Negative Emotional Responses; and Limited Access to Effective Emotion Regulation Strategies. Items are summed to provide a Total Emotion Dysregulation score. Scores range from 5 (low) to 180 (high). Higher scores are indicative of more emotion dysregulation problems. The DERS has high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and good construct validity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.