The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of hypnosis sessions performed in teleconsultations and led by a nurse, for patients with peripheral chronic neuropathic pain. Acceptability, satisfaction and effects (on pain and psychological distress) are also evaluated, comparing patients who have benefited from teleconsultations and those who did not.
Factors explaining peripheral chronic neuropathic pains are complex ; they require a personalized therapeutic strategy and multidisciplinary management. Among the recommended management, psychocorporal approaches such as hypnosis, are subject of recent interest. At the CHU de Bordeaux, the management of patients suffering from such chronic pains, consists of 5 hypnosis sessions, conducted face-to-face, each performed one month apart : the first session is carried out by a doctor and a hypnotherapist nurse and the 4 following sessions by the hypnotherapist nurse alone. However, it seems that this usual management is not easily accessible for patients who are geographically distant and/or who are unable to move due to excessive pain. In such situations, teleconsultations would avoid travel for these patients with low mobility and then would an interesting alternative to face-to-face consultations. Few studies have been done on hypnosis sessions led by teleconsultations. So, the whole purpose of this study is to compare the management of 15 patients by teleconsultations (experimental arm) with 15 other patients seen in face-to-face (control arm) to evaluate feasibility of teleconsultation in hypnosis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Current medications (only those prescribed to treat pain, anxiety and depression), non-drug treatment(s) prior to treatment in hypnosis as well as any ongoing treatment(s).
To screen for anxious and depressive symptoms
Measurement of pain intensity
Université Hospital, Bordeaux
Pessac, Pessac, France
5 hypnosis consultations (in face-to-face and by teleconsultation).
The rate (%) of included patients who have completed the 5 hypnosis consultations (in face-to-face and by teleconsultation).
Time frame: Month 8
Achievement/Acceptability
Acceptance rate (%) of the proposal to participate in the study in the two study arms: face-to-face hypnosis care (control arm) and care including hypnosis teleconsultations (experimental arm).
Time frame: Month 8
Numerical Pain Assessme
Mean difference in pain score, minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 10
Time frame: Day 0, month 1, month 2, month 3 month 4 and montth 7
Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD)
Mean difference in the anxiety and depression score, minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 42
Time frame: Day 0, month 4 and month 7
Learning self-hypnosis
Evaluate the frequency of the use of self-hypnosis throughout the treatment.
Time frame: Day 0, month 1, month 2, month 3 month 4 and montth 7
Ssatisfaction scale
Evaluate the level of satisfaction and the feeling of the patients with regard to the nursing care in hypnosis at the end of the care in the two study arms (face-to-face control arm and experimental arm with teleconsultations).
Time frame: Month 7
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
5 hypnosis consultation
Qualitative assessment
Age, sex, socio-professional category, level of education, comorbidities, date of diagnosis of chronic peripheral neuropathic pain, distance between home and hospital.