The objective of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance of multiplex respiratory PCR (PCR-RM) compared to standard microbiological tests and its potential impact on the early adaptation of antibiotic treatment in intensive care patients with severe pneumonia.
This is a prospective, observational, multicenter ICU study. Adult patients with severe pneumonia requiring invasive mechanical ventilation will be included. Severe pneumonia consists of 3 categories of pneumonia: community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP). The microbiological testing will be performed before antibiotic initiation on tracheobronchial aspirations, protected distal sampling, or mini-bronchoalveolar lavage as part of routine care. No additional samples will becollected for this study. Respiratory samples will be simultaneously tested by conventional microbiological techniques and multiplex respiratory PCR \[PCR-RM\] (BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel Plus). Classical microbiological culture (CMC) will be considered the gold standard for microbiological pneumonia diagnosis. The agreement between the results of the Pneumonia Plus® panel and the results of conventional microbial culture (CMC) will be assessed. An empiric antibiotic therapy will be prescribed according to the local ecology and the protocols of each ICU unit. Two senior experts in each participating center will have to approve the antibiotic prescription. The antibiotic therapy could be modified after the reception of the Mutilpex PCR results by the two senior experts. After the reception of the results of the classic microbiological culture, the previous antibiotic changes will be judged as appropriate or inappropriate by a multidisciplinary team including intensivists, infectious disease specialists, and microbiologists. Appropriate changes include adequacy, de-escalation, and optimization of antibiotic therapy, and inappropriate changes include inadequacy, escalation, and de-optimization.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
210
The BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia plus Panel
Avicenna Military Hospital
Marrakesh, Marrakesh Tensift El Haouz, Morocco
The rate of diagnostic concordance between Classical microbiological cultures and the respiratory multiplex PCR (RM-PCR) and conventional microbiological cultures (CMC) to identify pathogens responsible for severe pneumonia in critically ill patients.
Classical microbiological cultures (CMC) will serve as the gold standard for the comparison between techniques, considering a test result: 1. A true positive, when CMC and RM-PCR have identified the same microorganism (CMC+, PCR-RM +). 2. A false positive, when RM-PCR detected an organism but not CMC (CMC-, RM-PCR+) 3. A true negative, when no method detected any microorganism (CMC-, RM-PCR -) 4. A false negative, when CMC but not RM-PCR has detected an organism (CMC+, RM-PCR -). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the respiratory multiplex PCR will be calculated using the precedent findings.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
The impact of the respiratory multiplex PCR (RM-PCR) on the appropriateness of empirical antimicrobial therapy.
The proportion of patients for whom the respiratory multiplex PCR (RM-PCR) induces an appropriate change of antibiotic therapy. Appropriate changes include adequacy, de-escalation, and escalation of antibiotic treatment. * Adequacy is defined as introducing an antibiotic to cover a microorganism that was not adequately treated before the results of RM-PCR. * Escalation is defined by a widening of the ATB spectrum to cover a pathogen not taken into account or the detection of resistance genes. * De-escalation is defined as the use of a narrower-spectrum anti-infective or the discontinuation of an ATB combination.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.