To our knowledge, there is no randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of HP. We aim to perform a randomized study to assess the efficacy and safety of a regimen consisting of MMF and prednisolone against a regimen consisting of prednisolone alone for treating fibrotic HP. We hypothesize that the treatment of patients with fibrotic HP with MMF and prednisolone will be more effective and safer than treatment with prednisolone alone.
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a complex immunologically-mediated interstitial lung disease (ILD) resulting from sensitization to an inhaled antigen. It may be categorized into acute (acute/subacute) or chronic forms based on the duration of disease or evidence of chronicity on radiological or pathological findings. Lately, the American Thoracic Society (ATS) Guidelines 2020 has endorsed a new classification of HP into non-fibrotic and fibrotic types based on the absence or presence of signs of fibrosis on chest computed tomography (CT) or histology. According to a survey study, about three-fourths of respiratory physicians believe that fibrotic HP should be treated with glucocorticoids as the treatment of first choice, which also reflects the practice in most centers worldwide. However, there is some evidence that glucocorticoids may not be effective in the long-term treatment of fibrotic HP. Also, glucocorticoids are associated with several adverse effects especially when used over a long duration. Therefore, most experts recommend that glucocorticoids should be tapered to the lowest possible dose after a trial of about three months in chronic/fibrotic HP. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is characterized by an exaggerated T cell-mediated immune inflammatory response (T-lymphocytic alveolitis) due to increased migration, local proliferation, and decreased programmed cell death of lymphocytes. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive drug that acts by inhibiting the proliferation of T-lymphocytes and suppressing the recruitment of lymphocytes and monocytes into the sites of inflammation. Therefore, MMF is likely to be effective in the treatment of HP. There are only a few retrospective studies on the efficacy of MMF in the treatment of HP. To our knowledge, there is no randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of MMF in the treatment of HP. We aim to perform a randomized study to assess the efficacy and safety of a regimen consisting of MMF and prednisolone against a regimen consisting of prednisolone alone for treating fibrotic HP. We hypothesize that the treatment of patients with fibrotic HP with MMF and prednisolone will be more effective and safer than treatment with prednisolone alone.
Study Type
Prednisolone is a glucocorticoid that suppresses inflammation by several mechanisms. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive drug that acts by inhibiting the proliferation of T-lymphocytes and suppressing the recruitment of lymphocytes and monocytes into the sites of inflammation.
Prednisolone is a glucocorticoid that suppresses inflammation by several mechanisms.
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Chandigarh, India
RECRUITINGLung function (FVC) decline
Annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) assessed using spirometry assessed over 52 weeks
Time frame: 52 weeks
FEV1 decline
Annual rate of decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) assessed using spirometry over 52 weeks
Time frame: 52 weeks
Severity of breathlessness
Severity of dyspnea as assessed using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale
Time frame: 52 weeks
Six-minute walk distance
Change in six-minute walk distance (6MWD) from the baseline that will be performed using American Thoracic Society guidelines
Time frame: 52 weeks
Disease specific health status
Interstitial lung disease (ILD)-specific health status as assessed by the King's Brief ILD Questionnaire
Time frame: 52 weeks
Diffusion capacity
Change in the diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) of the lung from the baseline
Time frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects who develop progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF)
Proportion of subjects who develop progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF), which will be defined using the American Thoracic Society 2022 recommendations
Time frame: 52 weeks
Proportion of subjects who develop acute exacerbation(s)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
144
Proportion of subjects who develop acute exacerbation(s), which will be defined using the definition proposed by the International Working Group in 2016
Time frame: 52 weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse effects
Number of treatment-related adverse effects in each arm. The grading of adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0
Time frame: 52 weeks