Many patients have benefited from the implantation of brain stimulation electrodes for the treatment of various motor signs of Parkinson's disease in the phase of motor fluctuations. This technique has significantly improved the motor symptomatology of Parkinson's disease and the dyskinesias induced by pharmacological treatment. Technological advances in the field of deep brain stimulation (DBS) could improve the benefit of this therapeutic tool. therapeutic tool. While using directional electrodes, it remains possible to program the stimulation in conventional ring mode.
Idiopathic Parkinson's disease represents the second degenerative disease after Alzheimer's disease, with progressive motor and non-motor symptoms, affecting the dopaminergic system (at the origin of the cardinal symptoms) and the other systems, cholinergic, noradrenergic and serotonergic (responsible for the dopa-resistant symptoms). The functional repercussions are important and a source of handicap in the more advanced phases of the disease. Many patients have benefited from the implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes, associated with dopaminergic replacement therapy, for the treatment of various motor signs of Parkinson's disease in the phase of motor fluctuations. It is an advanced symptomatic therapy that does not prevent the progression of the disease. DBS is intended for Parkinson's patients in the phase of motor fluctuations. The aim of this treatment is to complement the therapeutic effect of pharmacological treatments that patients will have to continue as well as to compensate for certain effects induced by the drugs. The effectiveness of DBS therapy may decrease over time, especially in the context of a progressive pathology, and requires a change of batteries after several years (4 to 15 years, depending on the type of neurostimulator, non-rechargeable or rechargeable). Beyond these constraints, this adaptable therapy has significantly improved the motor symptomatology of Parkinson's disease and the dyskinesias induced by pharmacological treatment. Technological advances in DBS could improve the therapeutic benefit of this technique and limit its side effects (dysarthria, hypophonia, oculomotor disorders, muscular contractions induced by the diffusion of the current), by using different modalities of brain stimulation. Implantation of Boston Scientific Cartesia™ directional electrodes for Parkinson's patients who are candidates for deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) would allow reorientation and variation of the volume of the stimulated structure, which could improve therapeutic performance, by stimulating key target volumes for obtaining the clinical effect, limiting side effects by diffusion of the current on neighboring structures. While using directional electrodes, it remains possible to program the stimulation in ring mode, conventional stimulation modality, in monopolar or bipolar. The hypothesis is that the efficacy of DBS in directional mode will be more effective on the motor signs of Parkinson's disease compared to omnidirectional stimulation and bipolar mode, with a better tolerance profile (fewer side effects).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
10
Unilateral or bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in the treatment of Parkinson's disease using Boston Cartesia(TM) electrodes
Directional stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in the treatment of Parkinson's disease using Boston Cartesia(TM) electrodes
Centre Hospitalier Uniersitaire de Montpellier
Montpellier, France, France
RECRUITINGComparison of motor scores
Comparison of motor scores between classical ring, monopolar or bipolar stimulation and stimulation in directional mode thanks to the part III of the UPDRS (Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale). The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 60 (total disability).
Time frame: 12 months
Evaluation of patient acceptability for a stimulation modality
Evaluate for which programming modality(ies) the percentage of patients is most important
Time frame: 12 months
Evaluation of the tolerance of different types of stimulation
Collection of induced side effects (dysarthria, hypertonia, oculomotor disorders)
Time frame: 12 months
Evaluation of the clinical effects of programming functions
The additional percentage improvement in clinical scores versus directional stimulation without the use of the focus function at each visit.
Time frame: 12 months
Evaluation of clinical effects of Directional programming mode
the clinical effects of different directions on motor symptoms will be evaluated and compared to the ring, monopolar and bipolar stimulation modalities, for the two plots evaluated as being the most effective in controlling motor signs and with the widest therapeutic window. The evaluation will be made thanks to the part III of the UPDRS (Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale). The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 60 (total disability).
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.