The objective of this study is to characterize the extent of 1C70 meeting the amputees needs in comparison with their everyday and a comparator foot, in regards of daily activities, mobility and balance, as well as quality of life and pain.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
22
Investigational energy storage and return prosthetic foot with using novel elastic elements.
Commercially available carbon-fiber energy storage and return foot used as comparative foot for transtibial amputee subjects.
Zentrum für Healthcare Technology der Privaten Hochschule Göttingen (ZHT PFH)
Göttingen, Germany
John+Bamberg
Hanover, Germany
Pohlig Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Germany
UKM ProTec
Münster, Germany
Extent of meeting amputees prosthetic foot needs: 1C70 vs everyday foot
The extent of meeting amputees prosthetic foot needs by 1C70 as measured by a single question with a 0 to 10 scale compared to the same score for everyday foot. Higher score correspond with higher extent of meeting amputees prosthetic foot needs.
Time frame: 2 months after fitting with the last study feet
Extent of meeting amputees prosthetic foot needs: 1C70 vs comparator foot
The extent of meeting amputees prosthetic foot needs by 1C70 as measured by a single question with a 0 to 10 scale compared to the same score for comparator foot. Higher score correspond with higher extent of meeting amputees prosthetic foot needs.
Time frame: 2 months after fitting with the last study feet
Change in patient-perceived mobility (PLUS-M) compared to baseline
The change from baseline perception of mobility as measured by the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) 12-item short form. The PLUS-M questionnaire provides a T-score that ranges from 21.8 to 71.4. Higher PLUS-M scores correspond with greater mobility.
Time frame: Baseline measurement vs 2 months after fitting with 1C70
Change in patient-perceived mobility (PLUS-M) compared to the comparator foot
The change from baseline perception of mobility as measured by the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) 12-item short form. The PLUS-M questionnaire provides a T-score that ranges from 21.8 to 71.4. Higher PLUS-M scores correspond with greater mobility.
Time frame: 2 months after fitting with each of the study feet
Highest pain reported: 1C70 vs everyday foot
The level of pain as a highest pain during preceding 7 days reported on a 0 ("No pain at all") to 10 ("the most intense pain imaginable") scale for the following origins: residual limb, sound limb, back, shoulder \& neck area, phantom limb pain, while wearing the 1C70 foot compared to the everyday foot.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Pohlig Nürnberg
Nuremberg, Germany
Pohlig Traunstein
Traunstein, Germany
Time frame: Baseline measurement vs 2 months after fitting with 1C70
Highest pain reported: 1C70 vs comparator foot
The level of pain as a highest pain during preceding 7 days reported on a 0 ("No pain at all") to 10 ("the most intense pain imaginable") scale for the following origins: residual limb, sound limb, back, shoulder \& neck area, phantom limb pain, while wearing the 1C70 foot compared to the coparator foot.
Time frame: 2 months after fitting with each of the study feet