Due to the increased prevalence of neck pain in studied adolescents and young adults, this intervention is carried out, which mainly seeks to compare and verify the effectiveness of therapeutic exercise with education, compared to education alone. It is also necessary to mention the high levels of stress levels reported in students, which can affect the increase in pain and the perception of these at times when stress increases. The intervention has been decreed in the weeks before and during the exam period at the University of Valencia, to see if the neck pain experienced by students at similar stages of their academic life is prevented or reduced. It is decided to use education above all to give the participants a tool that allows the participants to find out what happens and why it happens when the participants suffer from neck pain, as well as an explanation of the pathology and the risk factors and how to avoid -the bear. In addition, knowledge about the condition in question can lead to a reconceptualization of pain, changing the approach and exposing a different approach, when treating the pathology. It must be said that in the structure and layout of the informative document, the investigators think of an instrument that can serve the participants for the future. Another reason for carrying out the study is the few tests on neck pain carried out with new technologies. The use of videos, therefore, seeks to facilitate access to the information provided, being a useful and practical tool for students, familiar with the use of new technologies. In addition, the training is intended to be as didactic as possible, the chosen exercises are carefully explained and the fact that they are found in videos and not in a practical class, favors access to the content in these, for that the participants use the videos at their disposal. Finally, treating neck pain with training and education and taking into account the stress of students, brings to conventional treatment an interesting perspective of coping, focused on the biopsychosocial field.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
48
An exercise protocol will be carried out through educational videos. There will be a total of four videos which will pose exercises for two weeks each. These exercises will be done twice a week. A reminder will be sent by email on the days that they must be carried out.
Information will be provided on neck pain and how exercise is able to help prevent it.
Faculty of Physiotherapy of the University of Valencia
Valencia, Spain
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Scale that evaluates pain from 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: 0 week (baseline)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Scale that evaluates pain from 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: 4 week (middle)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Scale that evaluates pain from 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: 8 week (post intervention)
SISCO Inventory of Academic Stress
The SISCO Inventory is a measure of academic stress in students of upper education or postgraduates. Consists of 31 items including three broad factors: Stressors, Symptoms and Coping. The first item is intended to filter which respondents are suitable candidates to answer the questionnaire. The subsequent item measures the perceived intensity of academic stress. Stressors (first factor, 8 items) represent the frequency in which the demands of the environment are valued as stressors; Symptoms (second factor, 15 items) indicate the frequency in which the symptoms are presented; and Coping (third factor, 6 items), identify the frequency of coping strategies. Responses are provided on a 5-point Likert type scale anchored by 1 (never) to 5 (always).
Time frame: 0 week (baseline), 4 week, 8 week (post intervention)
Neck Disability Index
This questionnaire has been designed to give the doctor information as to how your neck pain has affected your ability to manage in everyday life. Questions are scored on a vertical scale of 0-5. Total scores and multiply by 2. Divide by number of sections answered multiplied by 10. A score of 22% or more is considered a significant activities of daily living disability.
Time frame: 0 week (baseline), 4 week, 8 week (post intervention)
EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Questionnaire
This scale is divided into 5 items with 5 options each, which go from best to worst (1 best, 5 worst). In addition, a rule is used to assess health that goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the worst possible health and 100 is the best possible health.
Time frame: 0 week (baseline), 4 week, 8 week (post intervention)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.