Urinary incontinence (UI) is estimated to affect 25% à 45 % women all over the world. UI is associated with a poor Quality of life, with a strong level of certainty. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the second more prevalent type of UI . First-line treatment for SUI is conservative, non-drug and non-surgical treatment. Among these techniques, physiotherapist-supervised pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training (PFMT) as a first-line treatment; however, only half of women with SUI are cured with PFMT. Brain imaging shows that PFMs (involved in continence mechanisms) and gluteal muscles can activate the same cortical region. This synergy is found if the gluteal muscles are voluntarily activated, but not if the PFMs are volontary activated alone . In women, hip abductor physiotherapy is a common practice which has already been the subject of a very extensive literature and has largely shown its effectiveness in the quality of lumbo-pelvic control, balance, quality of life and risk of fall prevention. This rehabilitation is based on exercises that induce solicitation of the hip abductors by synergistic reflex activation during a range of well-known exercises. Recent work has shown the effect of hip abductors on the activation of the PFMs . Until today, there is no literature evaluating the effectiveness of a hip abductors training program without associated voluntary contraction of the PFMs (PPM) on UI. The hypothesis of this work will be to demonstrate that a complementary training focused on the hip abductor, complementary to concomitant PFMT, would benefit from a more significant improvement in continence, and also in physical abilities and quality of life. Because balance seems involved in UI, we therefore propose to to observe the effects on the frontal balance of the pelvis. As the investigators have already done in previous studies, to identifying factors that predict the success of our interventions, investiagtors have planned to evaluate the observance and adherence of our patients .Complementary, the investigators planned to evaluate the effect of both intervention on pelvic floor muscles and hip abductors strength and endurance, pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and quality of life. For this objective, the investigators intend to compare two randomized parallel groups: Group A follow a 12 sessions supervised PFMT + home based PFMs exercices. Group B follow a 12 sessions supervised PFMT + home based hip abductor exercices.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
78
hip abductors self training program during 7 to 10 weeks associate with a PFMT
Standard pelvic floor muscle training
Standard pelvic floor muscle training self training
Pôle santé de la Grace Dieu
Caen, France
RECRUITINGChu Rouen
Rouen, France
RECRUITINGMédipôle du Rouvray
Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray, France
RECRUITINGThe difference in the number of leaks per week observed after the end of treatment between the two arms at the last physiotherapy session.
This number of leaks per week will be recorded using question 3 of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-SF).
Time frame: 10 weeks
Measurement in centimeters of the offset in the frontal plane of the postero-superior iliac spines during a one leg stance
Time frame: 10 weeks
Average of the measurement in Newton of the force of the hip abductors during a maximum manual resistance test repeated 3 times using a dynamometer
Time frame: 10 weeks
Average of measurement in seconds of the hip abductors resistance during a manual resistance test repeated 10 times
Time frame: 10 weeks
Measurement rated from 1 to 5 of the strength of PFMs according to the "Modified Oxford Grading Scale" testing
Time frame: 10 weeks
Overall score and sub-scores of urinary symptoms from the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire
min: 0 : better outcome max : 21 worse outcome
Time frame: 10 weeks
Overall score and sub-scores of urinary symptoms of the Prolape quality of life questionnaire
Time frame: 10 weeks
Short Form-36 Quality of Life overall score and subscores
Time frame: 10 weeks
Overall score and sub-scores of physical inactivity and physical abilities from the Ricci & Gagnon questionnaire
Time frame: 10 weeks
Overall score and sub-scores of the therapeutic observance and adherence questionnaire (only at the end of treatment)
Time frame: 10 weeks
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire score (only at end of treatment)
Time frame: 10 weeks
Overall score and sub-scores of urinary symptoms from the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire questionnaire
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 month
Overall score and sub-scores of urinary symptoms of the Prolapsus Quality of Life questionnaire 3. SF-36 Quality of Life overall score and subscores
Time frame: throught study completion, an average of 6 month
Overall score and sub-scores of physical inactivity and physical abilities from the Ricci & Gagnon questionnaire
Time frame: throught study completion, an average of 6 month
Score du questionnaire Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
min: 1 better outcome max : 7 worse outcome
Time frame: throught study completion, an average of 6 month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.