In a previous randomized control trial, the investigators identified gaps in the implementation of tuberculosis (TB) contact investigation at multiple levels of the service delivery cascade. Drawing on prior experiences, the investigators have recently developed a novel strategy to enhance the implementation of routine contact investigation procedures. This user-centered implementation strategy was created through serial prototyping guided by human-centered design (HCD) and employs communities of practice (CoP) as an adjunctive adaptation and sustainment strategy. The investigators are now conducting a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized implementation trial in 12 study sites in Uganda to determine if the resulting user-centered implementation strategy enhances the delivery of TB contact investigation and other implementation outcomes, and also improves health outcomes.
The trial has 3 major aims: (1) to compare the implementation, effectiveness, and public health impact of TB contact investigation delivered via an enhanced, "user-centered" implementation strategy versus a standard implementation strategy in a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized implementation trial; (2) to identify processes and contextual factors that influence the implementation, effectiveness, and public health impact of the enhanced delivery strategy for TB contact investigation; and (3) to compare the costs and epidemiological impact of the enhanced and standard implementation strategies for TB contact investigation. The enhanced, user-centered strategy will employ two major components: a) a branded, participant-centered strategy consisting of implementation facilitation tools previously developed using human-centered design; and b) Communities of Practice, a community-health worker-centered, continuous quality improvement strategy. The goal is to improve the delivery of standard TB contact investigation following Uganda National TB \& Leprosy Programme guidelines. The investigators hypothesize that the enhanced, user-centered strategy will result in a greater proportion of close contacts completing TB evaluation than the standard strategy. They further hypothesize that successful implementation will be deemed feasible, acceptable, and appropriate by patients and CHWs and that it will increase self-efficacy and perceived social support among CHWs. Finally, the investigators hypothesize that models evaluating the impact of the user-centered strategy when delivered nationwide will find it cost-effective and able to reduce national TB incidence over a 10-year horizon.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
10,477
1. 4 participant-facing components: 1a) TB education pamphlet helps index TB persons disclose the need for household screening to contacts. 1b) Contact identification algorithm helps CHWs and index TB persons accurately enumerate contacts. 1c) Sputum collection video instructs contacts to expectorate good-quality sputum. 1d) Community Health Riders transport CHWs, index persons with TB, and contacts by motorcycle taxi, and collect and transport sputum. 2. 3 community health-worker-facing components: a) Weekly CHW meetings create communities of practice (CoP), professionals organized for peer support and systematic learning. Meetings involve problem solving, review of audit and feedback reports, and didactics on TB care, among other activities. 2b) Audit and feedback reports on contact investigation performance indicators weekly (individual CHW) and monthly (health facility). 2c) A group-chat application facilitates peer support among CHWs.
Once an eligible TB patient agrees to participate, CHWs will visit the patient to assess the eligibility of close contacts to participate. For eligible contacts who agree to participate, the CHW will perform TB symptom screening and arrange subsequent microbiologic, clinical, and/or radiographic evaluation. Those screening TB symptom-positive will be asked to expectorate a sputum sample, unless under age 5. If under age 5 or unable to produce sputum, contacts will be referred to the health centre for evaluation. A CHW will transport sputum samples to the health-centre laboratory for microbiologic evaluation and later report the test results back to the contact. During the standard implementation strategy period, CHWs at all sites will receive the standard TB program training on TB contact investigation and supportive supervision from the on-site National TB Program focal person.
Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium
Kampala, Uganda
Completion of TB Evaluation
The percentage of participants (close contacts) who are experiencing TB symptoms who complete TB evaluation within 60 days of the TB patient's treatment initiation date
Time frame: 60 days
TB Yield (Diagnosis and Treatment Initiation)
The difference between study periods in percentage of contacts diagnosed with active TB and initiated on treatment within 60 days of the TB patient's treatment initiation
Time frame: 60 days
Initiation of TB Preventative Therapy
The difference between study periods in percentage of contacts initiating TB preventative therapy (TPT) within 60 days of the TB patient's treatment initiation
Time frame: 60 days
Number of Contacts Diagnosed With Active TB
The difference between study periods in counts of the number of contacts diagnosed with active TB
Time frame: 60 days
Number of Contacts Initiating TB Preventative Therapy
The difference between study periods in counts of the number of contacts initiating TPT
Time frame: 60 days
TB Yield (All Contacts)
The difference between study periods in percentage of all TB cases among contacts
Time frame: 60 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.