The purpose of this early feasibility study is to explore several facets of hearing performance of Focused Multipolar stimulation in adult cochlear implant users.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
18
Cochlear implant programs (A and B) that utilise FMS with sound coding enhancements
Rocky Mountain Ear Center
Englewood, Colorado, United States
Denver Research and Technology Lab
Lone Tree, Colorado, United States
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven
Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Cochlear Technology Centre Belgium
Mechelen, Mechelen, Belgium
Difference Between the Maximum C-Level for MAP A and MAP B
Difference between the maximum comfortable loudness level C-Level for MAP A and MAP B. This is the maximum current level that provides loud but comfortable sound level for the cochlear implant user.
Time frame: 10 weeks
Difference in Spectral Resolution (QSMD) Score Between MAP A and MAP B
Mean difference between MAP A and MAP B for Quick Spectral Modulation Detection (QSMD) test. Higher scores indicate better spectral resolution and generally better ability to distinguish acoustic spectral patterns important for speech understanding. It measures the minimum modulation depth that can be perceived to enable discrimination of a spectrally modulated noise from a flat spectrum noise with the same bandwidth and overall intensity level.
Time frame: 10 weeks
Difference in Language Independent Test (LIT) Score Between MAP A and MAP B
Mean difference between MAP A and MAP B for the phoneme discrimination test, Language independent test (LIT). The LIT test measures how well a person can hear the difference between speech sounds by asking them to identify which sound is different from the others.
Time frame: 10 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
ENT Department, Sint-Augutinus Antwerp
Wilrijk, Wilrijk, Belgium