The purpose of this research study is to investigate a shorter radiation treatment schedule for head and neck cancers. The present study is a non -randomized phase II study that will enroll 50 patients and test feasibility of 30 Gy in 5 fractions of the primary disease and ipsilateral level I-III disease.
Radiotherapy (RT) is an integral cancer treatment and RT utilization rates for commonly occurring carcinoma include breast: 87%, cervical: 71%, head and neck: 84%, lung: 77%, and prostate: 58% \[1\]. Overall, 57.5% of global head and neck cancers occur in Asia especially in India \[2\]. Head and neck cancers in India accounted for 30% of all cancers. In India, 60 to 80% of patients present with advanced disease as compared to 40% in developed countries \[3\]. Inequitable radiotherapy availability in India leads to non-compliance in many cases, as patients need to travel long distances for treatment. The number of functional radiotherapy units in India is below the limit recommended by the World Health Organization \[3\]. This poses a serious barrier to radiotherapy access as well as timely delivery of multidisciplinary cancer care. Post operative radiation treatment for head and neck patients requires 6 weeks of time and the patient has to travel to the radiotherapy department daily for 5 days a week. This long course of radiation can lead to significant side effects resulting in some people being unable to complete the course of treatment. The Accelerate trial has potential to provide a quick solution (by reducing 30 fractions of PORT to 5 fractions) and is particularly suitable for resource constraint and overburdened radiotherapy. Five fractions of radiotherapy has been proven to be equally efficacious to long courses at various cancer sites like rectal cancer, breast cancer \[4,5\]. With small volume disease and technological advances in delivery of radiotherapy it is possible to deliver 5 fractions of hypofractionated RT to prostate, lung and pancreatic cancer \[6-8\]. The present study is a non -randomised phase II study that will enroll 50 patients and test feasibility of 30 Gy in 5 fractions of the primary disease and ipsilateral level I-III disease. References 1. Atun R, Jaffray DA, Barton MB, et al: Expanding global access to radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol 16:1153-1186, 2015. 2. Chaturvedi P. Head and neck surgery. J Can Res Ther 2009; 5:143 3. Kulkarni MR. Head and neck cancer burden in India. Int J Head Neck Surg. 2013; 4(1): 29- 35. 4. van der Valk MJM, Marijnen CAM, van Etten B, et al; Collaborative investigators. Compliance and tolerability of short-course radiotherapy followed by preoperative chemotherapy and surgery for high-risk rectal cancer: results of the international randomized RAPIDO-trial. Radiother Oncol. 2020;147:75-83. 5. Brunt AM , Haviland JS, Wheatley DA et al. Hypofractionated breast radiotherapy for 1 week versus 3 weeks (FAST-Forward): 5-year efficacy and late normal tissue effects results from a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial Lancet, 395 (2020), pp. 1613-1626, 6. Bezjak A, Paulus R, Gaspar LE, et al. Safety and efficacy of a five-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy schedule for centrally located non-small-cell lung cancer: NRG oncology/RTOG 0813 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1316-1325. 7. Alongi F, Cozzi L, Arcangeli S, et al. Linac based SBRT for prostate cancer in 5 fractions with VMAT and flattening filter free beams: preliminary report of a phase II study. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:171. 8. Tchelebi LT, Lehrer EJ, Trifiletti DM, Sharma NK, Gusani NJ, Crane CH, Zaorsky NG. Conventionally fractionated radiation therapy versus stereotactic body radiation therapy for locally ad-vanced pancreatic cancer (CRiSP): an international systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer. 2020;126:2120-2131
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Target volume will include tumor bed \& ipsilateral level I-III levels.
Nci, Aiims-Jhajjar
Jhajjar, Haryana, India
Severe late toxicity grade 3) at 2 year
Severe late toxicity \> 3 or higher grade 3) at 2 year
Time frame: 2 years
Loco-regional control rate
Time to an event \[longitudinal assessment at 3, 6, 12, 18, 21 and 24 months
Time frame: 2 years
Disease free survival
Time to an event \[longitudinal assessment at 3, 6, 12, 18, 21 and 24 months\]
Time frame: 2 years
Overall Survival
Time to an event \[longitudinal assessment at 3, 6, 12, 18, 21 and 24 months\]
Time frame: 2 years
Regional recurrence at ipsilateral level IV
Time to an event \[longitudinal assessment at 3, 6, 12, 18, 21 and 24 months\]
Time frame: 2 years
Acute toxicity
RTOG scale
Time frame: Every week for first month
Late toxicity
RTOG scale \[longitudinal assessment at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months\]
Time frame: 2 years
Swallowing function
MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory \[longitudinal assessment at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months\]
Time frame: 2 years
Quality of life EORTC QLQC30
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
EORTC QLQC30 module \[longitudinal assessment at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months\] The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. High score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
Time frame: 2 years
Quality of life H&B35
EORTC H\&B35 module \[longitudinal assessment at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months\] The head \& neck cancer module incorporates seven multi-item scales that assess pain, swallowing, senses (taste and smell), speech, social eating, social contact and sexuality. There are also eleven single items. For all items and scales, high scores indicate more problems (i.e. there are no function scales in which high scores would mean better functioning). The scoring approach for the QLQ-H\&N35 is identical in principle to that for the symptom scales / single items of the QLQ-C30.
Time frame: 2 years