The aim of this protocol is to perform a first randomized controlled trial evaluating how Tezepelumab affects the bronchial morphology (and computed tomographic variables in general) of asthmatic patients. In parallel, the investigators also hope to reproduce clinical benefits and perform a transcriptomic study that will juxtapose changes in genetic expression with changes in bronchial morphology and inflammatory signatures. The general hypothesis is that tezepelumab treatment is capable of at least partially reversing bronchial remodelling as detected on computed-tomographic (CT) scans. The investigators also expect such reversal to occur within a unique physiological repair environment that will be reflected by transcriptomic profiles
Tezepelumab is a human IgG2l monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against TSLP. Double-blind, randomized controlled trials comparing Tezepelumab treatment against placebo demonstrate net positive benefits in asthma patients. Animal research currently indicates that blocking TSLP can prevent bronchial remodelling in murine models (Chen et al. 2013), but no such observations have been attempted in humans. Within this context, the aim of this protocol is to perform a first randomized controlled trial evaluating how Tezepelumab affects the bronchial morphology (and computed tomographic variables in general) of asthmatic patients. In parallel, the investigators also hope to reproduce clinical benefits and perform a transcriptomic study that will juxtapose changes in genetic expression with changes in bronchial morphology and inflammatory signatures. The general hypothesis is that tezepelumab treatment is capable of at least partially reversing bronchial remodelling as detected on computed-tomographic (CT) scans. The investigators also expect such reversal to occur within a unique physiological repair environment that will be reflected by transcriptomic profiles. The primary objective of this protocol is therefore to compare the change-from-baseline in the average percentage bronchial wall area (%WA = (wall area (mm2)/ (wall area (mm2) + lumen area (mm2)))×100) for patients with asthma and undergoing 6 months of tezepelumab treatment with a similar population treated via placebo. Secondarily, continued treatment effects associated with longer treatment (12 months) or remanence after treatment stopping at 6 months will also be quantified. Study arms will additionally be compared in terms of: * Changes in radiomics (CT-scan data); * Changes in exacerbation rates and lung function; * Changes in serum club cell secretory protein (CCSP); * Changes in nasal single-cell transcriptomic signatures. This study also has an exploratory component designed to characterize the physiological repair environment. In depth radiomic and transcriptomic (including single-cell analyses) profiling will be performed. Finally, the capacity of baseline data to predict the response to tezepelumab will also be explored.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
90
Tezepelumab is supplied as a sterile, single-use, preservation-free, clear, colourless to slightly yellow liquid for subcutaneous administration in accessorized pre-filled syringes (APFS). Injections will be performed by study staff (doctors or nurses) during face-to-face study visits in participating centres. Subcutaneous injections are performed in a different body-part following the suggested rotation diagram.
APFS containing analogous placebo identical in appearance: Injections will be performed by study staff (doctors or nurses) during face-to-face study visits in participating centres. Subcutaneous injections are performed in a different body-part following the suggested rotation diagram.
CHU Dijon
Dijon, France
RECRUITINGCHU Grenoble Alpes La Tronche
Grenoble, France
RECRUITINGAPHP Bicêtre
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
RECRUITINGCHRU Lille
Lille, France
WITHDRAWNHôpital de la Croix Rousse
Lyon, France
RECRUITINGHôpital Nord Marseille
Marseille, France
RECRUITINGCHU de Montpelier
Montpellier, France
RECRUITINGAPHP Bichat
Paris, France
RECRUITINGHôpital Foch
Paris, France
RECRUITINGHôpital Haut-Lévêque
Pessac, France
RECRUITING...and 2 more locations
Comparaison on CT-scan in the change in mean percentage bronchial wall area (%WA) at the B1 and B8 bronchi, generations 3, 4 and 5
%WA = (wall area (mm²)/ (wall area (mm²) + lumen area (mm²)))×100) at bronchial levels likely to be affected.
Time frame: Between baseline and 6 months
compare on CT-scan the change in mean %WA between arms
%WA = (wall area (mm2)/ (wall area (mm2) + lumen area (mm2)))×100) at bronchial levels likely to be affected.
Time frame: Between baseline and 12 months
Comparaison on CT-scan in the average percentage bronchia wall thickness index (%WT) at the B1 and B8 bronchi, generations 3, 4 and 5
%WT = (wall thickness (mm) / airway diameter (mm))×100
Time frame: Between baseline and 6 months
Comparaison on CT-scan in the average percentage bronchia wall thickness index (%WT) at the B1 and B8 bronchi, generations 3, 4 and 5
%WT = (wall thickness (mm) / airway diameter (mm))×100
Time frame: Between baseline and 12 months
compare on CT-scan the change in wall area at the B1 and B8 bronchi, generations 3, 4 and 5
lumen area (mm²)
Time frame: Between baseline and 6 months
compare on CT-scan the change in lumen area at the B1 and B8 bronchi, generations 3, 4 and 5
lumen area (mm²)
Time frame: Between baseline and 6 months
compare on CT-scan the change in ratio wall area (WA) / lumen area(LM) at the B1 and B8 bronchi, generations 3, 4 and 5
WA/LA = WA(mm²)/LA(mm²)
Time frame: Between baseline and 6 months
compare on CT-scan the change in lumen diameter at the B1 and B8 bronchi, generations 3, 4 and 5
lumen diameter (mm)
Time frame: Between baseline and 6 months
compare on CT-scan the change in lumen circularity at the B1 and B8 bronchi, generations 3, 4 and 5
lumen circularity (4pi x area x perimeter-²)
Time frame: Between baseline and 6 months
Comparaison on CT-scan in the average percentage bronchial wall area(%WA) corrected by body surface area(BSA) at the B1 and B8 bronchi, generations 3, 4 and 5
%WA/BSA = (wall area (mm²)/ (wall area (mm²) + lumen area (mm²))×100)/(0.007184 x weight (kg)\^0.425 x height (cm) \^0.725)
Time frame: Between baseline and 6 months
Comparaison on CT-scan in the average percentage bronchial wall thickness (%WT) corrected by body surface area(BSA) at the B1 and B8 bronchi, generations 3, 4 and 5
%WT/BSA = ((wall thickness (mm) / airway diameter (mm))×100)/(0.007184 x weight (kg)\^0.425 x height (cm) \^0.725)
Time frame: Between baseline and 6 months
Change in the expiratory to inspiration ratio of mean lung density (MLDe/i),
expiratory-to-inspiratory ratios of mean lung density (MLDe/i)
Time frame: At Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Quantitative computed tomography measurements to evaluate airflow obstruction
Mucus plugging score (MPS)
Time frame: At Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in Total small Airway Count (TAC)
Total small Airway Count (TAC) mesured with Quantitative computed tomography
Time frame: Between Baseline and 6 months
Change in Total small Airway Count (TAC)
Total small Airway Count (TAC) mesured with Quantitative computed tomography
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in Lund Mackay score
Each sinus group (maxillary, anterior ethmoids, posterior ethmoids, sphenoid, frontal, ostiomeatal complex) is graded between 0 and 2 (0: no abnormality; 1: partial opacification; 2: total opacification). The ostiomeatal complex is scored as "0" (not obstructed) or "2" (obstructed). A total score of 0-24 is possible, and each side can be considered separately (0-12)
Time frame: Between Baseline and 6 months
Change in Lund Mackay score
Each sinus group (maxillary, anterior ethmoids, posterior ethmoids, sphenoid, frontal, ostiomeatal complex) is graded between 0 and 2 (0: no abnormality; 1: partial opacification; 2: total opacification). The ostiomeatal complex is scored as "0" (not obstructed) or "2" (obstructed). A total score of 0-24 is possible, and each side can be considered separately (0-12)
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in Presence/absence of nasal polyposis
Nasal brushing
Time frame: Between Baseline and 6 months
Change in Presence/absence of nasal polyposis
Nasal brushing
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in Annualized exacerbation rates
The patient journal will cover exacerbations and hospitalizations.Exacerbations will be further characterized according to severity as defined by GINA. Episode data (hospitalizations, and exacerbations) will be characterized by their beginning and end dates; These data will be used to estimate annualized exacerbation rates.
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in Days alive and not exacerbating
The patient journal will cover exacerbations and hospitalizations. Exacerbations will be further characterized according to severity as defined by GINA. Episode data (hospitalizations, and exacerbations) will be characterized by their beginning and end dates; These data will be used to estimate days alive and not exacerbating.
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in Days alive and not hospitalized
The patient journal will cover exacerbations and hospitalizations. Episode data (hospitalizations, and exacerbations) will be characterized by their beginning and end dates; These data will be used to estimate days alive and not hospitalized (total, and for each GINA type of exacerbation).
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second
Pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry (FEV1; litres and percent predicted)
Time frame: Between Baseline and 6 months
Change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second
Pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry (FEV1; litres and percent predicted)
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in forced vital capacity
Pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry (FVC; litres and percent predicted)
Time frame: Between Baseline and 6 months
Change in forced vital capacity
Pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry (FVC; litres and percent predicted)
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second / forced vital capacity Ratio
Pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry ( FEV1/FVC ratio (litres/litres)))
Time frame: Between Baseline and 6 months
Change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second / forced vital capacity Ratio
Pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry ( FEV1/FVC ratio (litres/litres)))
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in total lung capacity
Pre-bronchodilator plethysmography (TLC(total lung capacity ); litres and percent predicted)
Time frame: Between Baseline and 6 months
Change in total lung capacity
Pre-bronchodilator plethysmography (TLC(total lung capacity ); litres and percent predicted)
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in residual volume
Pre-bronchodilator plethysmography (RV (residual volume ); litres and percent predicted)
Time frame: Between Baseline and 6 months
Change in residual volume
Pre-bronchodilator plethysmography (RV (residual volume ); litres and percent predicted)
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in total lung capacity (TLC)/ residual volume(RV) ratio
Pre-bronchodilator plethysmography : total lung capacity (TLC)/ residual volume(RV) ratio (litres/litres)
Time frame: Between Baseline and 6 months
Change in total lung capacity (TLC)/ residual volume(RV) ratio
Pre-bronchodilator plethysmography : total lung capacity (TLC)/ residual volume(RV) ratio (litres/litres)
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in mean ACQ (Asthma Control Questionnaire)-6 score
The ACQ6 is a shortened version of the ACQ((Asthma Control Questionnaire) that assesses asthma symptoms (night-time waking, symptoms on waking, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheezing, and SABA use) omitting the FEV1 measurement from the original ACQ score. Patients are asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week by responding to one bronchodilator use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions are weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). The mean ACQ-6 score is the mean of the responses. Mean scores of ≤0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.75 and \<1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score ≥1.5 indicates not well controlled asthma (Juniper et al. 2006). Individual changes of at least 0.5 are considered to be clinically meaningful.
Time frame: Between Baseline and 6 months
Change in mean ACQ (Asthma Control Questionnaire)-6 score
The ACQ6 is a shortened version of the ACQ((Asthma Control Questionnaire) that assesses asthma symptoms (night-time waking, symptoms on waking, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheezing, and SABA use) omitting the FEV1 measurement from the original ACQ score. Patients are asked to recall how their asthma has been during the previous week by responding to one bronchodilator use question and 5 symptom questions. Questions are weighted equally and scored from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled). The mean ACQ-6 score is the mean of the responses. Mean scores of ≤0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.75 and \<1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score ≥1.5 indicates not well controlled asthma (Juniper et al. 2006). Individual changes of at least 0.5 are considered to be clinically meaningful.
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS)
The Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS) has undergone a vigorous validation process and is designed to assess patients' daily respiratory symptoms. Symptoms are evaluated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. A mean change in BCSS total score \> 1.0 represents substantial symptomatic improvement, changes of approximately 0.6 can be interpreted as moderate, and changes of 0.3 can be considered small (DeVries et al. 2016; Leidy et al. 2003).
Time frame: Between Baseline and 6 months
Change in Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS)
The Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS) has undergone a vigorous validation process and is designed to assess patients' daily respiratory symptoms. Symptoms are evaluated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. A mean change in BCSS total score \> 1.0 represents substantial symptomatic improvement, changes of approximately 0.6 can be interpreted as moderate, and changes of 0.3 can be considered small (DeVries et al. 2016; Leidy et al. 2003).
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in Sino Nasal Outcome Test 22
The SNOT-22 is a further modification of the SNOT-20 (Piccirillo et al. 2002), where the scoring has been simplified by removing the importance rating. In addition to the normal 20-item version of the SNOT, 2 additional items were measured, nasal blockage, and loss of sense of taste and smell. The 22-question SNOT-22 is scored as 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be) with a total range from 0 to 110 (higher scores indicate poorer outcomes); a MCID of 8.90 has been established.
Time frame: Between Baseline and 6 months
Change in Sino Nasal Outcome Test 22
The SNOT-22 is a further modification of the SNOT-20 (Piccirillo et al. 2002), where the scoring has been simplified by removing the importance rating. In addition to the normal 20-item version of the SNOT, 2 additional items were measured, nasal blockage, and loss of sense of taste and smell. The 22-question SNOT-22 is scored as 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be) with a total range from 0 to 110 (higher scores indicate poorer outcomes); a MCID of 8.90 has been established.
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
The SGRQ is a 50-item patient-reported instrument developed to measure the health status of patients with obstructive airway diseases. The questionnaire is divided into 2 parts: part 1 consists of 8 items pertaining to the severity of respiratory symptoms in the preceding 4 weeks; part 2 consists of 42 items related to the daily activity and psychosocial impacts of the individual's respiratory condition. The total score indicates the impact of disease on overall health status. This total score is expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, in which 100 represents the worst possible health status and 0 indicates the best possible health status.
Time frame: Between Baseline and 6 months
Change in St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)
The SGRQ is a 50-item patient-reported instrument developed to measure the health status of patients with obstructive airway diseases. The questionnaire is divided into 2 parts: part 1 consists of 8 items pertaining to the severity of respiratory symptoms in the preceding 4 weeks; part 2 consists of 42 items related to the daily activity and psychosocial impacts of the individual's respiratory condition. The total score indicates the impact of disease on overall health status. This total score is expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, in which 100 represents the worst possible health status and 0 indicates the best possible health status.
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Change in ECRHS III Main Questionnaire
The European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) III Main questionnaire is a survey used to track changing respiratory situations within the general population for epidemiological purposes. The questionnaire is composed of 32 pages and 105 questions. For the purposes of the present study, only the questions 21-28 will be used. Each selected question will be used as a stand-alone variable. The advantage of using these questions is that study distributions and longitudinal change in results can be compared to previously published epidemiological results for the general population
Time frame: Between Baseline and 6 months
Change in ECRHS III Main Questionnaire
The European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) III Main questionnaire is a survey used to track changing respiratory situations within the general population for epidemiological purposes. The questionnaire is composed of 32 pages and 105 questions. For the purposes of the present study, only the questions 21-28 will be used. Each selected question will be used as a stand-alone variable. The advantage of using these questions is that study distributions and longitudinal change in results can be compared to previously published epidemiological results for the general population
Time frame: Between Baseline and 12 months
Changes in serum Club cell secretory protein (CCSP)
Changes in serum Club cell secretory protein (CCSP), an emerging blood marker associated with pulmonary function and cellular cross-talk
Time frame: Between baseline and 6 months
Changes in serum Club cell secretory protein (CCSP)
Changes in serum Club cell secretory protein (CCSP), an emerging blood marker associated with pulmonary function and cellular cross-talk
Time frame: Between baseline and 12 months
Number of adverse event between arms
Time frame: Between baseline and 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.