In a high-risk group, ultrasonography at 6-month intervals and short-protocol magnetic resonance imaging at 1-year intervals were performed. sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for very early stage HCC are compared between conventional (biannual US) and alternative surveillance test are compared
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
199
non-contrast liver MRI focusing on HCC surveillance in a short scan time.
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Comparison of alternative surveillance program (alternating focused MRI + US in 6 month interval) and conventional surveillance (biannual US) for HCC detection
per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value for very early stage HCC, early stage HCC, all stage of HCC/liver cancer.
Time frame: up to one year
Comparison of annual focused MRI and biannual US for HCC detection
per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value for very early stage HCC, early stage HCC, all stage of HCC/liver cancer.
Time frame: up to one year
diagnostic yield for HCC
HCC incidence in the group and detection rate with either US or focused MRI
Time frame: up to one year
scan time of focused MRI
in room time, table time are manually recorded
Time frame: up to one month
comparison between false referral rates of biannual US and annual focused MRI
comparison between false positive report/finding for HCC in each surveillance modality.
Time frame: up to one year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.