The objective of this study is to determine the independent and additive effects of food texture and energy density on food and energy intake compared to a control condition.
Study design: The study has a 2x2 randomized crossover design. All participants receive 5 treatments and are their own control. Study population: Healthy adults (n=75) between 18-55 years old with a BMI between 18.5-30 kg/m2. Intervention: Participants will join 5 test days during which they receive, 5 test meals (lunch). The 5 test meals of this study are: 1.) low energy density, hard texture (slow eating rate) 2.) low energy density, soft texture (fast eating rate) 3.) High energy density, hard texture (slow eating rate) 4.) High energy density, soft texture (fast eating rate) 5.) Average energy density and medium hard texture (control). During eating and before and after eating the weight of the plate will be measured to determine intake. Additionally, participants will be recorded on video to determine eating behaviour (number of bites, chews and oral processing duration). The order in which participants will receive the diets will be randomized. The evening before and during each test day participants will keep a food and exercise diary. Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study outcomes are food and energy intake of each lunch meal. Secondary outcomes are, eating behaviour characteristics measured by video (eating rate (g/min and bites/min), number of chews (chews/bite and chews/gram), bite size (gram/bite), oral processing duration (seconds), appetite (hunger, fullness, desire to eat, desire to eat sweet, desire to eat savoury, prospective consumption) and sensory characteristics (liking (taste + smell), desire to eat the meal, expected satiation, sweet, savoury, smoothness, chewiness, thickness) of the meals. Additional outcomes are individual differences in microstructure of eating, appetite responsiveness, eating Behavior phenotype, interoceptive sensitivity and anthropometry measures. During the trial new technology to capture food intake and eating behavior will be validated which is also an outcome of this trial.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
75
Food properties of commercially available food products
Wageningen university
Wageningen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Energy intake
Intake in Kcal
Time frame: One meal, up to 30 minutes
Food intake
Intake in gram
Time frame: One meal, up to 30 minutes
Eating rate
Eating rate gram/min
Time frame: One meal, up to 30 minutes
chews
number of chews per bite
Time frame: One meal, up to 30 minutes
bite size
gram/bite
Time frame: One meal, up to 30 minutes
Energy intake rate
kcal/min
Time frame: One meal, up to 30 minutes
bites
number of bites per meal
Time frame: One meal, up to 30 minutes
swallows
number of swallows per meal
Time frame: One meal, up to 30 minutes
oral exposure time
duration of food in mouth in seconds
Time frame: One meal, up to 30 minutes
Appetite
subjective ratings of appetite on a 100 mm line scale (visual analogue scale)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: One meal, up to 30 minutes
Individual differences in fat free mass (FFM)
% FFM of total body weight
Time frame: 5 minutes
individual eating rate
eating rate (gram/min) of carrots of each participant (personal trait)
Time frame: 1 minute
Individual appetite responsiveness
interoceptive sensitivity the ratio between the amount drank till first satiation signal and complete fullness, according to the waterload test
Time frame: 10 minutes
Sensory properties
rating on a 100mm line scale (visual analogue scale from 0 - not at all to 100 extremely) of the sensory properties of the sandwiches offered during the test sessions
Time frame: 5 minutes