The aim of this study is to compare hypertrophy of the FLR after PVE with microparticles to hypertrophy after PVE with cyanoacrylate in a material large enough to answer the study question. In addition, other factors that may influence the degree of hypertrophy will be evaluated in a multivariable analysis. The hypothesis is: PVE with cyanoacrylate is superior to PVE with microparticles in terms of FLR hy-pertrophy.
With expansion of indications for major liver surgery, portal vein embolization (PVE) is increasingly used in order to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). De-spite vide variety of materials available to occlude the portal veins the most commonly used are cyanoacrylate and microparticles/spheres. Earlier studies have failed to show superiority of one over the other in terms of hypertrophy of the FLR while PVE with cy-anoacrylate seems to be less time consuming. Two small previous studies from single centers have shown greater growth by cyanoacrylate compared to particles (1) with 90 included patients and the second study with 34 included patients (2), but larger reviews have failed (3). Cyanoacrylate might give a more robust FLR hypertrophy (4) . The main problem in evaluating previous studies has been the large heterogeneity and the often poorly described study populations.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
265
Portal vein emboliazation with either NBCA or micro particles.
Linköping University Hospital
Linköping, Sweden
FLR hypertrophy
Time frame: Spring 2023
Degree of hypertrophy
Time frame: Spring 2023
Kinetic growth rate
Time frame: Spring 2023
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.