This project seeks to determine whether primary care practices that receive supplemental partnership building implement UI-Assist with higher fidelity than practices that receive streamlined practice facilitation alone.
This quality improvement research project is one of five across the country funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) through the EvidenceNOW Managing Urinary Incontinence initiative titled: "Improving Nonsurgical Treatment of Urinary Incontinence among women in Primary Care." The purpose of this national initiative is to identify implementation strategies that best support primary care practices in delivering high quality care for urinary incontinence. Components of high-quality care including screening, diagnosing, and offering non-surgical first-line treatments for urinary incontinence in women, all of which already occur in primary care. The WI-INTUIT quality improvement project compares two implementation strategies to implement UI-Assist, an intervention to support primary care practices in increasing their rates of screening, diagnosing, and treating urinary incontinence in their adult female patients: (1) streamlined practice facilitation (SPF) and (2) streamlined practice facilitation in combination with partnership building (SPF+PB).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
40
To support primary care in implementing guideline-based care, it is helpful to distill interventions to their key components, such as the five major intervention steps for tobacco use and dependence (the "5 A's"). The 5 A's (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange) has been shown to help primary care providers implement clinical practice guidelines with minimal additional burden. The 5 A's can be similarly simplified for urinary incontinence (UI) screening and treatment to Ask (screen for UI); Advise (inform that effective nonsurgical treatments exist); and Assist (help patient get treatment with pharmacotherapy, referral to community classes, physiotherapy or urology / urogynecology).
In addition to the strategies described above, those practices allocated to streamlined practice facilitation and partnership building will have facilitation and configurable solutions that engage community resources and enable coalition building. In addition to a practice facilitator, a partnership facilitator from the Wisconsin Institute for Healthy Aging (WIHA) will identify existing local community resources with which the practice may choose to partner. After initiating academic detailing, these practices will have further access to Drs. Brown and Neuner for ongoing consultation. An online learning community will also be created where information can be shared and exchanged throughout the duration of the project and beyond the maintenance phase.
Kaiser Permanente
San Diego, California, United States
MetaStar, Inc.
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Differences in Screening Rates for Urinary Incontinence
Defined as the rate of eligible patients screened for urinary incontinence (UI) at preventive visits. Data on UI screening and patient eligibility will be ascertained through responses to a short post-visit patient survey. Patients will be asked five questions to determine if their healthcare team screened for and, if necessary, provided them with treatment options for UI. Preventive visits include visits classified as: a preventive visit, a physical exam, or a Medicare annual wellness visit.
Time frame: 3 months, 10 months
Differences in scores on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Global Health
This 10-item survey measures symptoms, functioning, and quality-of-life for various chronic conditions and diseases. Two overall scores are calculated: a Global Physical Health Score and a Global Mental Health Score. Response options are on a 5-pt scale. Each score has a range of 0-20, 0 represents most severe mental and physical impairment, 20 represents the best state of health possible.
Time frame: 10 months, 13 months
Differences in bowel leakage symptoms
This 4-item survey assesses patient experience with accidental bowel leakage in terms of frequency (Rarely, Sometimes, Weekly, Daily, I don't know), amount of leakage (Gas only, Small amount of stool, Moderate amount of stool, Large bowel movement, I don't know) and seeking care (Yes, No, I don't know).
Time frame: 10 months, 13 months
Differences in scores on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Constipation
This 3-item scale measures patient's difficulty with passing bowel movements within the past 7 days. Question responses are Never, One day, 2-6 days, Once a day, More than once a day or Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always. Higher scores indicate patients have a greater difficulty with passing bowel movements.
Time frame: 10 months, 13 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Self-reported changes: changes in usage of urinary incontinence coping strategies
This item ascertains whether the individual has tried to use any urinary incontinence coping strategies "Have you tried any strategies to improve your urinary incontinence/ leakage?" Response options: "Yes, No, I don't know". The uptake in strategies between baseline and 90-day follow-up will be assessed.
Time frame: 10 months, 13 months
Self-reported changes: change in money-spent on incontinence treatments
Self-reported changes: change in out-of-pocket costs of incontinence treatments to manage symptoms. This will be ascertained by asking participants how much money have they spent on products to manage their symptoms.
Time frame: 10 months, 13 months
Self-reported changes: urinary incontinence treatments adopted
This item addresses which urinary incontinence treatment strategies the individual implemented "If yes, what strategies did you try? Please select all that apply." Response options: (1) Making changes to what you eat or drink; (2) Making changes to how often you urinate; (3) Wearing pads, panty liners, or disposable undergarments (diapers); (4) Doing pelvic floor muscle exercises (Kegels) on your own; (5) Doing pelvic floor muscle exercises (Kegels) with a therapist; (6) Using a medication; (7) Stopping a medication; (8) Using a pessary (something that sits inside the vagina to help with urine leakage); (9) Having a procedure (for example, injections to the bladder, electrical stimulation, or surgery); (10) Something else: \_\_\_\_\_\_
Time frame: 10 months, 13 months
Self-reported changes: change in pad use
Self-reported changes: change in the number and type of pad(s) used
Time frame: 10 months, 13 months
Global perception of improvement (GPI)
Global perception of improvement (GPI) is a tool for Global Rating of Patient Satisfaction and Perceptions of Improvement. This item asks patients if they feel their urinary incontinence has changed over the past 90 days. Participants are able to select one of the following options: very much better, much better, a little better, no change, a little worse, much worse, very much worse.
Time frame: 13 months
Practice contextual factors - reach
This questionnaire collects practice-level demographic information including: setting, general patient demographic information, general provider-level information, practice patterns, and relationships with other health care systems.
Time frame: 1 month
Difference in scores of the Change Process Capability Questionnaire (CPCQ) Strategies Scale
This validated instrument assesses practice systems ability to implement change by measuring attitudes and experience with implementation strategies in a Likert rating scale. Each response to the CPCQ survey is coded so that 2=strongly positive, 1=positive, 0=neutral, -1=negative, and -2=strongly negative. The coded responses are summed to create a strategies score, with the score ranging from -28 to +28. More negative scores are associated with lower use of strategies and more positive scores are associated with higher use of strategies.
Time frame: 1 month, 9 months
Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change
This 12-item survey measures how well employees at an organization feel they can implement the change in processes proposed by an intervention. Each of the 12-items is measured by a Likert scale (1=Disagree through 5=Agree). Responses are summed; higher scores indicate participants are more likely to initiate change, exert greater effort, and exhibit greater persistence; whereas, lower scores indicate the opposite.
Time frame: 1 month, 9 months
Clinical Staff Questionnaire in the National Demonstration Project - Community knowledge
The community knowledge subset of the Clinical Staff Questionnaire, consists of four questions on a Likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree). Scores on this subset will be summed and then averaged for each individual's response (score range: 1 to 5). Items will be reverse-scored when appropriate so that higher numbers reflect more positive ratings.
Time frame: 1 month, 9 months
Clinical Staff Questionnaire in the National Demonstration Project - Practice adaptive reserve
The practice adaptive reserve subset of the Clinical Staff Questionnaire, consists of 23 questions on a Likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree). Scores on this subset will be summed and then averaged for each individual's response (score range: 1 to 5). Items will be reverse-scored when appropriate so that higher numbers reflect practices' ability to make and sustain change.
Time frame: 1 month, 9 months
Change in response to a single-item burnout measure
The single-item burnout measure, adapted from the Mini Z Burnout survey, assesses healthcare staff burnout. Responses are 1-5, with scores of 3 or higher defining high burnout.
Time frame: 1 month, 9 months
Change in response to Urinary Incontinence Assist Project Practice Survey
All clinic staff members will be asked about their experience implementing the UI-Assist tool. The survey will ask individuals to rate various aspects of their clinic's prior experiences with urinary incontinence on a Likert scale (Not at all, slightly, somewhat, very, extremely). Individuals will be asked questions pertaining to the ease of incorporating UI-Assist into their project on a Likert scale, as well as questions pertaining to the perception of the project in their clinic on a Likert scale (1=strongly disagree through 7=strongly agree).
Time frame: 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Differences in scores of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ-UI)
ICIQ-UI is a subjective measure of severity of urinary loss and quality of life for those with urinary incontinence. It is scored on a scale from 0-21. Based on the score participant can be placed in four severity categories: slight (1-5), moderate (6-12), severe (13-18) and very severe (19-21).
Time frame: 10 months, 13 months
Differences in scores of Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7)
The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire - Short Form (IIQ-7) will be used to assess areas in a patient's life that may have been influenced or changed by their urinary incontinence. Patients are asked to select the response that best describes how much their activities, relationships, and feelings are being affected by urinary incontinence. Item responses are assigned values of 0 for "not at all," 1 for "slightly," 2 for "moderately," and 3 for "greatly." The average score of items responded to is calculated. The average, which ranges from 0 to 3, is multiplied by 33 1/3 to put scores on a scale of 0 to 100. A score \<50 indicates good quality of life, between 50-70 indicates moderate quality of life, and \>70 indicates poor quality of life.
Time frame: 10 months, 13 months
Patients' health literacy level
Patients will be asked four questions to determine their health literacy level through the BRIEF - health literacy screening tool. Each item is worth 1 to 5 points depending on their response. Add the values for the four responses to get a total score, which can range from a minimum of 4 to a maximum to 20. A score of 4 - 12 (limited) indicates the patient is not able to read most low literacy health materials; will need repeated oral instructions; materials should be composed of illustrations or video tapes. Will need low literacy materials; may not be able to read a prescription label. A score of 13 - 16 (marginal) indicates the patient may need assistance; may struggle with patient education materials. A score of 17 - 20 (adequate) indicates the patient will be able to read and comprehend most patient education materials.
Time frame: 10 months