The United States is in the midst of an opioid crisis. Over-prescription of opioid analgesic pain relievers contributed to a rapid escalation of use and misuse of these substances across the country. In 2016, more than 2.6 million Americans were diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD) and more than 42,000 have died of overdose involving opioids. This death rate is more than any year on record and has quadrupled since 1999 (1,2). Leveraging the potential of available data bases and health IT technologies may help to combat opioid crisis by targeting various aspects of the problem ranging from the prevention of opioid misuse to OUD treatment. NIH through NIDA solicits the research and development of data-driven solutions and services that focus on issues related to opioid use prevention, opioid use, opioid overdose prevention or OUD treatment. In this project, We The Village, Inc. will address a need to prepare Concerned Significant Others (CSOs) to best use their influence over the trajectory of a loved one's OUD. CSOs are motivated to help, make majority of treatment decisions and payments and have influence over treatment entry and thus, impact the trajectory of an OUD. The goal of the project is to establish the technical efficacy and commercial viability of CRAFT-A at scale by conducting the fully powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two online interventions: CRAFT-A (hereinafter referred to as CRAFT or digital CRAFT) and PEER support (the original comparison group). Based on Phase I findings, the team anticipates the CRAFT condition will achieve better outcomes than the PEER condition in a) treatment entry and retention, b) Concerned Significant Others' (CSO) health and wellbeing, c) CSO-IP relationship, and d) CRAFT knowledge.
The primary objective of the proposed Phase II work is to validate technical effectiveness and substantiate commercial viability of delivering CRAFT principles via a data-driven scalable digital program and coaching methods. The Contractor will work with subject matter experts and researchers to achieve the specific aims below. Technical Objectives 1. Optimize WTV CRAFT-informed prototype and protocol for digital group coaching based on Phase I findings and subject matter advisory input to produce the at-scale prototype. Technical Objectives 2. Test prototype usability and reliability to deliver the protocol to specifications, and make any refinements needed. Technical Objectives 3. Demonstrate prototype technical efficacy and commercial viability at scale by conducting a fully powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two digital interventions: a) CRAFT-A (digitally automated with group coaching), b) PEER support (the original WTV product as a comparison group). Based on Phase I findings, when tested at baseline versus post-intervention in a randomized clinical trial, the team anticipates the CRAFT-A condition to achieve better outcomes than the PEER condition in a) treatment entry and retention, b) Concerned Significant Others' (CSO) health and wellbeing, c) CSO-IP relationship, and d) CRAFT knowledge. Results will substantiate viability for at scale commercialization and dissemination through WTV's existing and growing network of partners.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
212
Community Reinforcement Approach and Family Training (CRAFT) is a scientifically based intervention designed to help concerned significant others (CSOs) to engage treatment-refusing substance abusers into treatment. This new intervention method was developed with the belief that the CSO can play a powerful role in helping to engage the substance user in treatment. It is often the substance user who reports that family pressure or influence is the reason sought treatment. CSOs benefit by becoming more independent and reducing their depression, anxiety and anger symptoms even if their loved one does not enter treatment. CRAFT uses a positive approach versus confrontation, emphasizing learning new skills to cope with old problems. Some components include: how to stay safe, outlining the context in which substance abusing behavior occurs, teaching CSOs how to use positive reinforcers (rewards) and how to let the substance user suffer the natural consequences for their using behavior.
An online peer support forum with other CSOs. Members of the forum post questions or comments to weekly peer-led discussions and receive responses and feedback from other CSO forum members. Members typically express concerns regarding their IP's wellbeing and ask other members to share any strategies they have employed when dealing with their IPs. Interactions typically, are based either in 12-Step strategies members have learned (usually through Al-Anon or Nar-Anon Family Groups or Family Training Workshops provided by treatment programs) or in CRAFT skills learned (usually from treatment programs or other We The Village members). A staff member from We The Village monitors forum interactions to ensure members are interacting respectfully.
We The Village, Inc.
New York, New York, United States
New Treatment Entry: IP Treatment Status
Participants report whether their loved one has attended any treatment for their opioid problem since the last assessment by answering 8 questions regarding participation in treatment (e.g., detox, any treatment, new treatment, MAT, new MAT, counseling, support group, and other group). Reports of new treatment, new MAT, and treatment at the follow-up assessment which are not reported at baseline will be categorized as treatment entry. In addition, entry into WTV recovery coaching, WTV family coaching, or reports of treatment entry to WTV staff will be categorized as treatment entry. The outcome is the proportion of participants reporting that their loved one (IP) entered new treatment.
Time frame: 3 months
Treatment Retention: IP Treatment Retention Status
Participants report whether their loved one has attended any treatment for their opioid problem since the last assessment by answering 8 questions regarding participation in treatment (e.g., detox, any treatment, new treatment, MAT, new MAT, counseling, support group, and other group). Reports of same treatment, same MAT, and treatment at the follow-up assessment which are reported at baseline will be categorized as treatment retention. In addition, retention in WTV recovery coaching, WTV family coaching, or reports of treatment entry to WTV staff will be categorized as treatment retention. The outcome is the proportion of participants reporting that their loved one (IP) is retained in treatment.
Time frame: 3 months
Treatment Retention: IP Treatment Retention Status
Participants report whether their loved one has attended any treatment for their opioid problem since the last assessment by answering 8 questions regarding participation in treatment (e.g., detox, any treatment, new treatment, MAT, new MAT, counseling, support group, and other group). Reports of same treatment, same MAT, and treatment at the follow-up assessment which are reported at baseline will be categorized as treatment retention. In addition, retention in WTV recovery coaching, WTV family coaching, or reports of treatment entry to WTV staff will be categorized as treatment retention. The outcome is the proportion of participants reporting that their loved one (IP) is retained in treatment.
Time frame: 6 months
Relationship Happiness: Relationship Happiness Scale
Global score from the 10-item scale was calculated by adding scores (1-10) from 10 items. Minimum possible score was 10 and maximum was 100. Higher scores reflect greater Relationship Happiness.
Time frame: 3 months
Relationship Happiness: Relationship Happiness Scale
Global score from the 10-item scale was calculated by adding scores (1-10) from 10 items. Minimum possible score was 10 and maximum was 100. Higher scores reflect greater Relationship Happiness.
Time frame: 6 months
CSO Health and Wellbeing: Profile of Mood State (POMS) - Short Form
Total mood disturbance (TMD) score calculated by adding scores (1-5) from the tension (6 items), depression (8 items), anger (7 items), fatigue (5 items), and confusion (5 items) subscales, then subtracting the score form the vigor (6 items) subscale. Minimum TMD possible score was 1 and maximum was 149. Higher scores reflect greater mood disturbance.
Time frame: 3 months
CSO Health and Wellbeing: Profile of Mood State (POMS) - Short Form
Total mood disturbance (TMD) score calculated by adding scores (1-5) from the tension (6 items), depression (8 items), anger (7 items), fatigue (5 items), and confusion (5 items) subscales, then subtracting the score form the vigor (6 items) subscale. Minimum TMD possible score was 1 and maximum was 149. Higher scores reflect greater mood disturbance.
Time frame: 6 months
CSO Health and Wellbeing: SF-12 Physical Health Subscale
The 7-item scale was transformed so that is had a mean of 50 and a s.d. of 10 in the general US population. Scores above and below 50 are above and below the average with each point representing a difference of 1/10th of a standard deviation.
Time frame: 3 months
CSO Health and Wellbeing: SF-12 Physical Health Subscale
The 7-item scale was transformed so that is had a mean of 50 and a s.d. of 10 in the general US population. Scores above and below 50 are above and below the average with each point representing a difference of 1/10th of a standard deviation.
Time frame: 6 months
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire
The WPAI yeilds four types of scores: 1. Absenteeism (work time missed) 2. Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness) 3. Work productivty loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism) 4. Activity Impairment WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: 3 months
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire
The WPAI yeilds four types of scores: 1. Absenteeism (work time missed) 2. Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness) 3. Work productivty loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism) 4. Activity Impairment WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Time frame: 6 months
CRAFT Knowledge: CRAFT Knowledge Scale
Measuring the proficiency with which participants answer questions about what to do in scenarios as per the CRAFT approach.
Time frame: 3 months
CRAFT Knowledge: CRAFT Knowledge Scale
Measuring the proficiency with which participants answer questions about what to do in scenarios as per the CRAFT approach.
Time frame: 6 months
New Treatment Entry: IP Treatment Status
Participants report whether their loved one has attended any treatment for their opioid problem since the last assessment by answering 8 questions regarding participation in treatment (e.g., detox, any treatment, new treatment, MAT, new MAT, counseling, support group, and other group). Reports of new treatment, new MAT, and treatment at the follow-up assessment which are not reported at baseline will be categorized as treatment entry. In addition, entry into WTV recovery coaching, WTV family coaching, or reports of treatment entry to WTV staff will be categorized as treatment entry. The outcome is the proportion of participants reporting that their loved one (IP) entered new treatment.
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.