a Study of Combined mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT for Highly Suspicious Patients Performing Radical Prostatectomy Without Biopsy

Overview

This is an observational, open, single-arm, prospective, staged entry（based on Fleming's Group-Sequential Design） clinical study The Goal is to evaluate the feasibility and clinical value of direct robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy without prostate biopsy in patients with high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer based on a prostate MRI PI-RADS score of ≥4 and the PSMA PET/CT positive criteria. The Primary endpoint is positive pathological diagnosis of prostate cancer after direct radical prostatectomy without prostate biopsy. The question addressed is whether the feasibility of biopsy-free radical prostatectomy could be scientifically and rationally derived based on Fleming's Group-Sequential design.

Prostate biopsy is currently the key method for diagnosing prostate cancer. However, there are various risks associated with prostate biopsy. First, biopsy complications occur and usually include bleeding, infection, urinary retention, and vasovagal reflexes. Bleeding is one of the most common complications following prostate biopsy, with perineal biopsy hematuria occurring in 39%-44% of cases, rectal bleeding in 17%-27% of cases, and hematospermia in 12%-16% of cases. Infection is one of the more definite complications of prostate biopsy. The incidence is 5-12%. The probability of urinary retention after prostate biopsy is 0.5% to 1.7%. The vasovagal reflex is mainly characterized by a rapid drop in blood pressure, pallor, sweating, nausea, vomiting, chest tightness and, in severe cases, transient coma. The incidence is 0.9% to 16.7%. It is usually necessary to wait 2-4 weeks after biopsy before radical prostate cancer surgery can be performed. Therefore, timely treatment of the patient may be delayed. Second, the pain, anxiety and even fear associated with the biopsy are always with the patient. Third, the issuance of pathology reports generally takes 7-8 days and, if immunohistochemistry is involved, another 2 weeks, a long time with limited management of the full course of the disease, as well as patient attrition. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has a high tissue resolution and ideal specificity and sensitivity. mpMRI PI-RADS scores of 3, 4 and 5 were associated with a 35%, 60% and 91% diagnosis of prostate cancer, and furthermore, 17%, 34% and 67% diagnosis of CsPCa, respectively. On the other hand, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) can specifically anchor prostate cancer cells and has a high sensitivity and specificity for detection.Studies have shown that 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT has a sensitivity of 88%-92% and a specificity of 92%-95% for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. In recent years, PET has also been combined with MRI to obtain many advantages in PET functional imaging as well as MRI imaging discrimination, which is more effective in improving the positive rate of impact diagnosis of prostate cancer. The combined assessment of multiparametric MRI and PSMA PET/CT has greatly increased the likelihood of prostate cancer in people with multiple abnormalities, and on the other hand, the complications associated with prostate biopsy as well as the delay in surgery and the resulting increased difficulty of surgery. In December 2021, the European Journal of Urology first reported on radical surgery for prostate cancer without biopsy . The investigators designed this clinical trial based on a combination of multiparametric MRI and PSMA PET/CT to evaluate patients with high suspicion of prostate cancer and make quantitative statistics. mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT were not only among the study parameters, but also could be satisfied with PSMA PET/CT, which was implemented after signing an informed consent after interpretation and performing a direct radical surgery without prostate biopsy. More importantly, the investigators used Fleming's Group-Sequential Design for the first time, which met the sample size requirements while avoiding the dilemma of having to recruit more patients for the study. Fleming's Group-Sequential Design N=71，P0=0.900， P1=0.980 Alpha=0.0230 Power=0.8067 Stage; Sample Size; Cumulative Sample Size; Accept H0 if R ≤ Ag; Reject H0 if R ≥ Rg; ①. 24; 24; 22 27 ②. 24; 48; 45 48 ③. 23; 71; 68 69 Explanation and description of "Stage Results of Fleming's Group-Sequential Design": (1) P0=0.900, defined as a pathologically minimum acceptable prostate cancer positivity rate of 90% in the population of patients undergoing biopsy-free radical prostatectomy. 2\) P1=0.980, defined as a pathologically desirable prostate cancer positivity rate of 98% in the population of patients undergoing biopsy-free radical prostatectomy. 3\) Based on the Fleming group sequential trial design idea, the sample size is calculated using PASS11 software, with 24 cases in the first stage, 24 cases in the second stage, and 23 cases in the third stage, for a total sample size of 71 cases. 5\) The protocol is implemented until the completion of the first phase a) If the number of positive cases of pathology after biopsy-free radical prostatectomy is ≤ 22, it indicates the end of this study and concludes that biopsy-free radical prostatectomy is not feasible. b) If the number of positive cases is 23 or 24, then proceed to the second phase. 6\) The protocol is implemented until the completion of the second phase a) If the number of positive cases is ≤45, it indicates the end of this study and concludes that biopsy-free radical prostatectomy is not feasible. b) If the number of positive cases is 48, it indicates the end of this study and concludes that biopsy-free radical prostatectomy is feasible. c) If the number of positive cases is 46 or 47, it suggests that the study needs to enter the third phase. 7\) Implementation of the protocol to completion of phase III 1. If the number of positive cases is ≤68, this indicates the end of the study and concludes that radical biopsy-free radical prostatectomy is not feasible. 2. If the number of positive cases is ≥69, it indicated the end of the study and concluded that biopsy-free radical prostatectomy is feasible.