The goal is to pilot test a highly accessible, web-based, pragmatic, scalable intervention to overcome ongoing problems with high stakes decision-making by surrogate decision-makers of patients in ICUs with severe acute brain injury (SABI), including those with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury, large hemispheric acute ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage.
Every 30 seconds an adult in the U.S. suffers a severe acute brain injury (SABI) from traumatic brain injury or large ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, resulting in 200,000 deaths and \>900,000 survivors living with disability annually. Every day, surrogate decision-makers face the difficult "goals of care" decision in intensive care units (ICUs) to continue or withdraw life support while considering the patient's long-term prognosis. In this study, we will pilot test a pragmatic, scalable intervention to overcome ongoing problems with high stakes decision-making by surrogates of patients with SABI in ICUs. These problems are an important target for intervention, because they contribute to 3 major clinical and public health issues: 1) family members struggle in the role of surrogate, leading to lasting symptoms of psychological distress; 2) clinicians are poorly trained in communicating prognosis after SABI, often doing so with variability and bias, inadequately preparing families for their decisions; 3) patients often receive burdensome treatments that they would not choose. Decision aids improve the quality of patients' decisions based on a large evidence-base, but no empirically validated tools currently exist for surrogate decision-making in SABI patients at high risk for death or disability. This is problematic because surrogates of SABI patients are unprepared for the difficult decisions about the use of life support and patients' potential long-term disability, which hinge on both medical information and the patient's values and preferences. We have developed and refined a tailored digital, web-based decision aid (DA) for families of critically ill SABI patients, conceptually grounded in the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, to enhance, not replace, clinician-family communication. We will leverage a digital platform, which is portable and shareable among family members when geographically distant or not allowed to visit the ICU (as during the COVID-19 pandemic) and allows integration of videos to reach lower-literacy groups. This innovative tool challenges the existing paradigm for decision-making in SABI patients. This pilot study among 50 surrogates of SABI patients and their clinicians will assess the feasibility of deploying the web-based tool as well as to explore the tools impact on measures of communication and decision-quality.
Study Type
The web/mobile/tablet-based digital DA+C toll is designed to enhance communication and shared decision making between clinicians and surrogates of critically ill severe acute brain injury (SABI) with four goals: to 1) prepare families for their surrogate role and discussions with clinicians; 2) provide balanced information to families on prognosis and all available treatment options; 3) provide tailored information about the patient and family to clinicians in advance of family meetings; and 4) serve as a communication guide for clinicians in the clinician-family meeting to facilitate shared decision-making.
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
UMass Memorial Hospital
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Feasibility of tool use by surrogate decision-makers
Data tracking analytics built into the tool will be employed to determine the extent to which the tools is used as per protocol.
Time frame: Duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Feasibility of enrolling surrogates in a stepped-wedge (before/after) clinical trial in a neurocritical care setting
Measured by meeting target enrollment.
Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 18 months past primary start date
Feasibility of retaining surrogates in a neurocritical care setting
The number of subjects that complete the long-term follow-up.
Time frame: Three-months post SABI
Participants' ratings of usability of the tool (Intervention surrogates only)
Usability of the tool as measured with the System Usability Scale.
Time frame: Duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Participants' ratings of perceived effectiveness of the tool in preparing them for decision-making (Intervention surrogates only)
Perceived Effectiveness will be measured with an 11-item perceived effectiveness questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale.
Time frame: Duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Fidelity to intervention protocol
Fidelity to the intervention protocol will be measured using self-checklists by clinicians and review of a random selection of 30% of the audio-recorded clinician-family meetings
Time frame: Through study completion, estimated 18 months past primary start date
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
50