The goal of this randomized, controlled, monocentric, single-blind, 2-arm, feasibility clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety of MectaShield hydrogel coating and to capture its preliminary clinical performance in the prevention of early peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients undergoing cementless revision hip arthroplasty. The main questions it aims to answer are: * demonstrate that the hydrogel coating MectaShield does not interfere with primary stability; * evaluate clinical and functional outcomes, the rate of PJI and possible adverse events. Participants will undergo cementless revision hip arthroplasty; during surgery MectaShield hydrogel coating is applied on orthopaedic implants' surfaces (femoral stem and, if revised, acetabular cup) as a protective barrier for the prevention of bacterial adhesion. Surgery and follow-up are completed as per local standard practice. Stability will be assessed radiologically, while functional outcomes and PJI will be monitored by HOOS-PS, ASESPIS scores and according to the consensus document presented by European Society of Radiology (ESRa), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). Researchers will compare the results of the treatment group with those from a control group receiving cementless revision hip arthroplasty without the application of MectaShiled hydrogel coating.
Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is among the first three reasons for joint replacement failure. PJI is a serious condition that may lead to repeated surgical interventions, prolonged hospitalization, high costs, and significant morbidity, although low mortality. To address this concern, antibacterial coating of implants has been proposed, as the adherence of the microorganisms to the implant, forming a biofilm, plays a strategic role in the pathogenesis of PJI. MectaShield (Medacta International SA) is a novel resorbable hydrogel coating intended to be spread on orthopaedic implants' surfaces as a protective barrier for the prevention of PJI. The study aims to evaluate the safety of MectaShield and to capture its preliminary clinical performance in the prevention of early PJI in patients undergoing cementless revision hip arthroplasty. Patients suitable to receive MectaShield for cementless revision hip arthroplasty will be invited to take part to the study during the preoperative visit. Follow-up is performed after 3 and 12 months. Data collection includes clinical and functional data for preoperative and postoperative assessments, as well as intraoperative details, adverse events and device deficiencies. Patients will be randomized 1:1 in 2 groups: * Control (no MectaShield) * MectaShield hydrogel coating (+ antibiotic) The primary objective is to demonstrate that MectaShield hydrogel coating does not interfere with early primary stability at 3 months of follow-up Secondary objectives are: 1. To demonstrate that MectaShield does not interfere with primary stability at 12 months of follow-up 2. To evaluate clinical and functional outcomes at 3 and 12 months of follow-up 3. To evaluate the rate of PJI at 3 and 12 months of follow-up 4. To evaluate the occurrence of adverse events and device deficiencies
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
56
hydrogel coating applied to implant's surfaces during cementless hip revision arthroplasty
standard cementless hip revision arthroplasty
Orthopädisches Spital Speising GmbH
Vienna, Austria
RECRUITINGStem subsidence
Radiological measurements of stem subsidence (mm) will be performed in hydrogel coating and control groups, and mean subsidence will be compared
Time frame: 3 months follow up
Stem subsidence
Radiological measurements of stem subsidence (mm) will be performed in hydrogel coating and control groups, and mean subsidence will be compared.
Time frame: 12 months follow up
Presence of radiolucent zones in the femur
Presence of radiolucent lines (≥1 mm) in the 7 Gruen zones will be assessed by radiologic assessment.
Time frame: 3 and 12 months follow up
Cup migration (if revised)
Radiological measurements will be performed on the Acetabular cup (if revised) to measure cup migration.
Time frame: 3 and 12 months follow up
Cup orientation (if revised)
Radiological measurements will be performed on the Acetabular cup (if revised) to measure cup tilt.
Time frame: 3 and 12 months follow up
Presence of radiolucent lines in the acetabular cup (if revised)
Radiological measurements will be performed on the Acetabular cup (if revised) to evaluate the presence of radiolucent lines in the 3 DeLee-Charnley zones (≥1mm).
Time frame: 3 and 12 months follow up
Clinical and functional outcomes
Evaluation of daily-life activities, measured with the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Short Form (HOOS-PS) \[0 - 100, worst to best\].
Time frame: 3 and 12 months follow up
Signs of infection
Evaluation of any sign of infection at the site of surgery, measured with the ASESPIS score (acronym for "Additional treatment, Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, Separation of deep tissues, Isolation of bacteria, and Stay as inpatient prolonged over 14 days") \[0 - \>40, best to worst\].
Time frame: 3 and 12 months follow up
occurrence of PJI
The occurrence of PJI is assessed with the diagnostic flowchart proposed by the consensus document issued by the European Society of Radiology (ESRa), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID).
Time frame: up to 12 months
Peri-operative and postoperative adverse events and device deficiencies.
Monitoring of any peri-operative and postoperative adverse events and device deficiencies.
Time frame: up to 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.