Shared Decision Making in Paediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Overview

The goal of this mixed-methods prospective cohort study is to assess the impact of shared decision-making (SDM) on newly diagnosed pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients and their families. Patient and familial decisional conflict regarding the choice and course of treatment is shown to be high, especially for the newer class of IBD treatments called biologic agents. SDM intervention comprises of coaching with a decision coach (DC) on all aspects of treatment and care, along with educational decision aids (DA) provided and adapted from Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. The main aims of this study are: 1. to determine if SDM intervention has an impact on patient and parental decision making in pediatric IBD treatments, mainly by assessing decisional conflict and decision satisfaction/regret. 2. to adapt and assess the acceptability of DA in a Canadian academic center. Participants who have been recommended a new biologic as part of their clinical care for IBD will be recruited to the SDM intervention group. The participants will have DC sessions until a final treatment decision is made, will be given DAs, and will be followed by baseline and post-intervention surveys to assess decisional conflict and satisfaction/regret. The comparator group will include participants who have been recommended and have commenced a new biologic within the last 12 months. Outcome metrics will evaluate the impact on parental and patient decisional conflict following SDM intervention, and decisional satisfaction/regret 6-12 months from therapy start.

Rationale Patient and family-centered care has become prevalent in the last few decades, recognizing the pivotal role of patients and their families in the decision-making process. Partnering with the healthcare team improves decision making, reduces uncertainty and conflicts that often accompany complex decisions, potentially leading to better outcomes for the patient and family. This shared decision-making (SDM) employs decision aids (DA) and/or an impartial Decision Coach (DC) as a foundation to help patients be actively involved in their care and ensure the best outcomes. A group of chronic diseases with complicated prognoses and poorly understood pathophysiology, Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) has shown increasing incidence in children. Long-term therapy is required to maintain remission. About 60% of patients undergo biologic therapy, many needing a change of therapy or surgery due to failed initial induction. The availability of multiple biologic therapies for paediatric IBD (pIBD), each with risks, benefits and side effects, modes of administrations, dosing and insurance coverage issues, frequently overwhelms patients and parents when deciding on initial therapies. Delays in the decision process may also result in further complications and reduced steroid-free remission rates. This project will investigate the impact of SDM on familial stress, decisional confidence and decisional regret of pIBD patients and their families. Expected outcomes are a change in decisional conflict and regret, leading to improved efficiency and quality of care supporting the need for this approach in all healthcare settings. Aims and Hypothesis The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate whether an SDM intervention has an impact on patient and parental decision making in pIBD treatments, focusing on the constructs of decisional conflict and decision satisfaction/regret. The secondary aim is to adapt and assess the acceptability of the DA in a Canadian academic center. The investigators hypothesize that: 1) Parents and adolescent patients will experience reduced conflict post-decision because of the SDM intervention. 2) The SDM intervention will reduce decisional regret 6 months after the treatment decision. 3) The DA will be accepted and have a positive effect on patient and parent preparation for decision making. 4) Patients and parents will be satisfied with the DC session. Study design and methods This is a mixed methods prospective cohort and case-control pilot study. Recruitment: 75 parents of pIBD patients will be recruited in the intervention and comparator groups each over 2 years' time. New biologic therapy patients will be in the intervention group, those who have been on a biologic within the last 12 months in the comparator group. Patients referred to the SDM program at Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) by the clinicians (Dr. Eileen Crowley, Dr. Dhandapani Ashok, and Dr. Kevin Bax) will be prospectively screened for enrollment and initially approached for the study by the clinicians. Interested patients will be provided letters of information and consent (assent if applicable - in the instance participants are unable to provide consent, since the population includes children and adolescents) by the clinicians or the research team prior to the session(s) with the DC. Participation in the study is voluntary and will not impact the clinical SDM process. SDM Intervention: Intervention group families will be referred to the DC for independent virtual session(s) to discuss recommended treatment plans facilitated by the Ottawa Family Decision Guide. Multiple meetings may be necessary until a final decision is made. All SDM consults will be done virtually using a secure videoconferencing platform. The Ottawa Family Decision Guide will be used to facilitate the discussion. A DA will be provided to the study participants in the form of information cards containing information about different treatment options in pediatric IBD. This includes administration schedule, side effects, risk of cancer, among others. Sessions with the Decision Coach and the DAs provided will work in tandem to provide the best outcome for the patient and their family. The DA has been developed and provided by the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and adapted to the Canadian setting with electronic version by this research group with approval from the authors. Study procedures: Patient characteristics and clinical outcome data will be collected from medical charts. All information will be deidentified and anonymous, complying with the requirements for the protection of patient privacy and confidentiality. Intervention group participants will complete the baseline survey prior to any consultations. Validated SDM questionnaires will be applied during and post decision visit, as is part of the clinical program, with baseline questionnaires at first visit. Decisional regret will be assessed 6 months after therapy start. The validated questionnaires are: 1. SURE (Sure of myself; Understand information; Risk-benefit ratio; Encouragement) questionnaire and 16 item Decisional Conflict Scale pre/post SDM intervention, 2. Preparation for Decision Making Scale: acceptability and effect of DA following the intervention, 3. Decision Coach Questionnaire: acceptability of the DC session post intervention, 4. Decisional Regret Scale: distress or remorse after the treatment decision Statistical analysis: Summary statistics will employ medians and interquartile ranges for continuous variables or means and standard deviations when appropriate. Frequencies with proportions will be used for categorical variables. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test will be used to measure change in decisional conflict pre- and post-intervention. Mann-Whitney U tests will be used to measure differences between intervention and comparator groups. SPSS v.27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) will be used for all analyses, and p-values \<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.