Impact of pectoral nerve block on postoperative pain and quality of recovery in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: A prospective study
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women; surgery is still the mainstay for the treatment of breast cancer . Postoperative pain can seriously reduce the quality of patient's life, and acute pain can even trigger chronic pain syndrome. Thoracic paravertebral, thoracic epidural, intercostal nerve, and interscalene brachial plexus blocks have been used for anesthesia and abirritation during mastectomy, but their applications are limited by the complicated technique of the procedures and several complications. In recent years, there has been increasing interest on a novel, less invasive technique, the pectoral nerve (PECS) block. Numerous clinical trials have focused on the analgesic potential of the pectoral nerve block in breast augmentation surgery, small breast surgery, and breast cancer surgery, and have shown positive results. Several prospective observational studies in recent years demonstrated that postoperative pain following breast surgery becomes chronic in up to 57% of women. One of the most important risk factors is insufficiently treated postoperative acute pain. The current gold standard for acute postoperative pain is a preventive procedure-specific multimodal treatment including nonopioids, opioids and regional analgesia. A recently published Cochran's meta-analysis demonstrated that regional analgesia \[e.g. paravertebral block (PVB), local infiltration\] might even reduce the risk of chronic postsurgical pain after breast surgery. According to a recently published guidelines, pectoral nerves (PECS) blocks seem to be an effective alternative to PVB to manage effectively postsurgical pain in major breast surgery.Anatomical studies revealed a different local anaesthetic spread following injections between the pectoralis major and minor muscles (PECS I) and a combination of the latter injection with a deeper injection between the pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles (PECS II) but the results were not conclusive. Many trials have been published and some meta-analyses revealed a high analgesic efficacy following PECS II blocks compared with no block or PVB. However, one of these meta-analyses was criticised because of methodological problems (e.g. evidence assessment, missing sham block group), pain intensities not analysed separately for resting pain and pain during movement and comparisons with other established or emerging regional anaesthetic techniques (e.g. local infiltration, erector spinae block) were not performed.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
40
The patients were randomised to receive a PECS block consisting of 30 ml of levobupivacaine 0.25% after induction of anaesthesia (PECS group) or a saline mock block (control group). The patients answered a 40-item QoR questionnaire (QoR-40) before and 1 day after breast cancer surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Female undergone mastectomy and have received conventional analgesic methods
Assiut university
Asyut, Egypt
Post operative pain
Postoperative pain score at rest Pain score using a verbal numerical scale (0-10) in one breast (bupivacaine) compared to the other breast (placebo).
Time frame: 1year
Patient's quality of life
1. Postoperative pain score on movement Pain score using a verbal numerical scale (0-10) in one breast (bupivacaine) compared to the other breast (placebo) 2. Postoperative pain score at rest Pain score using a verbal numerical scale (0-10) in one breast (bupivacaine) compared to the other breast (placebo).
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.