In the last four years alone, residents of Puerto Rico have experienced a slew of natural disasters including Hurricane Maria in 2017, earthquakes in 2019 and 2020, the continued COVID-19 pandemic from 2020-2022, and most recently Hurricane Fiona. This series of distressing events can lead to an increased need for mental health resources and trauma treatment. Furthermore, the unique single-district structure of the Puerto Rican education system allows for the efficient dissemination of potential interventions and treatment to all students. The purpose of this study is to examine two treatment conditions for educators and school-aged children in Puerto Rico experiencing burnout, fatigue, and high stress: delivery of a mindfulness-based educator curriculum and, for children who report Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptomatology, delivery of the mindfulness curriculum with the additional intervention of Cue-Centered Therapy (CCT). The study has two aims: 1) To assess the efficacy of the mindfulness curriculum and of CCT in a population of students, counselors, and teachers, characterized by high stress over the last few years of natural disasters and pandemic challenges and 2) To identify genetic contributions to resilience by analyzing gene expression in students before and after the intervention. The overarching goals of the investigators' research collaboration are to improve educators' psychological well-being and children's socioemotional development when faced with high stress and adversity and to improve mental health clinicians' competence and confidence in treating children exposed to trauma by training them in CCT. The investigators' research will identify critical biopsychosocial components responsible for the cognitive, behavioral, and emotional improvement and effective implementation strategies in a large but geographically dispersed school district. The knowledge base that will result from this study will inform the implementation of trauma-informed care in school settings and with populations experiencing stress and adversity, and contribute to the investigators' understanding of the underlying biology of these interventions to provide a rationale for further development and dissemination.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
80,800
The Start with the Heart curriculum includes psychoeducation, lessons, and activities, on mindfulness, neurobiology, meditation, positive thinking, movement, and nutrition to promote well-being. The curriculum will be taught in the classroom to students for 15-20 min per day for 6-8 weeks.
Pure Edge Inc will train teachers to deliver the Start with the Heart curriculum. The training emphasizes the neuroscience of stress and educator self-care. The teachers will implement the training in their respective classrooms for 6-8 weeks.
The Early Life Stress and Resilience Program team members will train school counselors on Cue-Centered Therapy through self-paced online modules, virtual and in-person live training, and office hours as needed. Counselors will implement the intervention with eligible students for 15-18 weeks.
Students who report a threshold of PTSD symptoms will be offered participation in Cue-Centered Therapy with their school counselors. They will have one-on-one therapy that targets trauma experiences through cognitive behavioral tools, narrative therapy, exposure therapy, psychoeducation, and more. Their caregivers will be involved as needed. They will enroll in treatment for 15-18 weeks.
Eligible students will give DNA buccal swabs at 2-3 time points for later analysis of genetic markers.
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGCentros Sor Isolina Ferre
San Juan, Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico
SUSPENDEDDepartment of Education Puerto Rico
San Juan, Puerto Rico
RECRUITINGMean Change from Baseline in Resilience Score
Resilience is assessed using the Child/Youth and Adult Resilience Measure on a 5- point Likert scale. Score range 1 to 5 (1=Not at all, 5=A lot). The total score is summed. Changes in scores will be assessed between all time points.
Time frame: Three time points: Baseline, week 8, week 23
Mean Change from Baseline in Work Self-Efficacy Score
Work Self-Efficacy is assessed on a 5- point Likert scale. Score range 1 to 5 (1=Not well at all, 5=Very Well). The total score is summed. Changes in scores will be assessed between all time points.
Time frame: Teachers: Baseline, week 8; Counselors: Baseline, week 23
Mean Change from Baseline in Anxiety Score
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) symptoms are assessed using the GAD-7 on a 4- point Likert scale. Score range 0 to 3 (0=Not at all, 3=Nearly every day). Total score is summed. Changes in scores will be assessed between all time points.
Time frame: Three time points: Baseline, week 8, week 23
Mean Change from Baseline in Depression Score
Depression is assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 on a 4- point Likert scale. Score range 0 to 3 (0=Not at all, 3=Nearly every day). Total score is summed. Changes in scores will be assessed between all time points.
Time frame: Three time points: Baseline, week 8, week 23
Mean Change from Baseline in Somatic Symptoms Score
Somatic symptoms are assessed using the PHQ-15 on a 3- point Likert scale. Score range 0 to 2 (0=Not bothered at all, 2=Bothered a lot). Total score is summed. Changes in scores will be assessed between all time points.
Time frame: Three time points: Baseline, week 8, week 23
Changes in Methylation Pattern of Genes
Using DNA methylation to analyze DNA samples from buccal swabs to investigate genetic markers of resilience. Genetic markers to be analyzed include: CTNNB1, ITGB8, CSRP2, WTAP, TSC22D1, HNRNPH1, NTRK2, DCX, CDK14, PTNN, SLC1A3, IGFBP2, ERBB4. Changes in genetic expressions will be assessed between all time points.
Time frame: Three time points: Baseline, week 8, week 23
Mean Change from Baseline in Family Functioning Score
Family functioning are assessed using the Family Assessment Device on a 4- point Likert scale. Score range 1 to 4 (1=Strongly Agree, 4=Strongly Disagree). Unhealthy responses are reverse-scored and each subscale is averaged. Only the General Functioning subscale will be used for the study. Changes in scores will be assessed between all time points.
Time frame: Three time points: Baseline, week 8, week 23
Mean Change from Baseline in Sleep Quality Score
Sleep quality is assessed using the Brief-Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Questions are open answer (i.e. When have you usually gone to bed at night? How many hours of actual sleep did you get at night?). Total score is calculated by summing subscores of sleep duration, latency, day dysfunction, sleep efficiency, sleep quality, and meds. Changes in scores will be assessed between all time points.
Time frame: Three time points: Baseline, week 8, week 23
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.