The goal of this study is to compare the microbiologic diagnostic yield of pre-aspiration agitated pleural fluid versus that of conventionally aspirated fluid in pleural infection patients. The main question it aims to answer is, whether fluid agitation helps to increase the microbiological yield.
In pleural infection, It is suggested that the bacteria being diagnostically targeted, might more likely be residing on the pleural surface with a better blood supply and nutrition rather than being planktonic in the acidic, glucose deficient pleural fluid. The investigators thus hypothesize that an agitation of the pleural fluid prior to sample aspiration would aid in achieving a better cellular representation of the pleural space. This could have the effect of washing bacterial cells off the pleural surface as well as moving sedimented cells in the aspirated sample. This study aims to investigate whether an increase in the microbiological yield for infected pleural fluid could be achieved by a pre-aspiration agitation of the pleural fluid which would have a positive effect on management and eventual patient outcomes. Adult participants with pleural infection will undergo thoracentesis via both the standard and agitated fluid techniques guided by thoracic ultrasound. Microbiological yields will be compared.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Using a 16-18 gauge cannula, a standard thoracentesis will be performed then a sample of pleural fluid will be aspirated and rapidly flushed into the pleural space and redrawn again for a few cycles before a sample is finally drawn into the collection syringe
Chest Diseases Department, Alexandria University Faculty of Medicine
Alexandria, Egypt
Diagnostic yield of the microbiologic analysis
Percentage of samples with a positive microbiologic result among both aspiration techniques
Time frame: results within 1 week of sampling
LDH level difference between both aspiration methods
Difference in LDH levels in the aspirated fluid via both techniques
Time frame: results within 1 day of sampling
Glucose level difference between both aspiration methods
Difference in glucose levels in the aspirated fluid via both techniques
Time frame: results within 1 day of sampling
Protein level difference between both aspiration methods
Difference in protein levels in the aspirated fluid via both techniques
Time frame: results within 1 day of sampling
Neutrophilic count difference between both aspiration methods
Difference in neutrophilic count in the aspirated fluid via both techniques
Time frame: results within 1 day of sampling
Lymphocytic count difference between both aspiration methods
Difference in lymphocytic count in the aspirated fluid via both techniques
Time frame: results within 1 day of sampling
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.