ADAPT-HER2-IV will address question of optimal neoadjuvant therapy in patients with less advanced -HER2+ EBC. ADAPT-HER2-IV is planned as a superiority trial to demonstrate higher pCR rates in both clinically relevant subgroups of low-intermediate risk HER2+ EBC. Moreover, it aims to demonstrate excellent survival in patients treated by T-DXd (with the use of standard chemotherapy at investigator´s decision restricted only to patients with substantial residual tumour burden after T-DXd-treatment).
As the ADAPT-trials have clearly shown, pCR after 12 weeks of therapy, independent of the specific de-escalated neoadjuvant regimen and independent of further use of systemic chemotherapy, is an independent predictor of excellent prognosis4,19, also in patients treated by an antibody-drug conjugate alone (T-DM1), or in those receiving pertuzumab+trastuzumab+/-weekly paclitaxel. In contrast to the adjuvant setting, none of the neoadjuvant trials so far has focused on HER2+ patients with a low-intermediate risk profile (e.g., node-negative patients with cT1-2 tumours). The ADAPT-HER2-IV trial aims to close this evidence gap. Since there is some uncertainty about the optimal treatment duration in intermediate- to high-risk HER2+ EBC (e.g., tumour size \>3 cm), we recommend using a longer 18-week taxane-based treatment (+/- carboplatin, at investigator´s decision) due to a large body of evidence for taxane + carboplatin combinations in patients in locally advanced stages. Antibody-drug conjugates appear to be ideal candidate drugs for a "de-escalated" treatment due to their favourable safety (reduced alopecia, polyneuropathy rates, etc.) and a high efficacy profile (e.g., comparable pCR rates after 18 weeks of T-DM1 and taxane+pertuzumab+trastuzumab in the PREDIX HER2 trial20). Similarly to the classical chemotherapy landscape, optimal duration of antibody-drug conjugate-based neoadjuvant therapy remains unclear. pCR rates of around 40% to 60% were observed after 12 and 18 weeks of T-DM1 treatment (+/-pertuzumab) in the ADAPT TP, KRISTINE and PREDIX HER2 trials in HR+/HER2+ disease21,22. Moreover, long-term survival seem to be comparable between T-DM1+pertuzumab and older chemotherapy-containing regimens (docetaxel+carboplatin+trastuzumab+pertuzumab) despite of higher local progression rates and lower pCR in one study22. Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) has shown promising activity in a small cohort of metastatic patients, including both HER2+ and HER2-low BC, pre-treated with several lines of therapy. Doi et al. reported overall response rates (ORR) of 58% and a disease control rate of 100% with overall survival at 12 months at in HER2+ disease pre-treated by T-DM1+/-pertuzumab in a late line setting23. T-DXd-therapy was associated with a manageable safety profile. Recently, clearly higher efficacy of T-DXd vs. T-DM1 was shown in second line metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the DESTINY-03 trial24. Median progression free survival was not reached in T-DM1-arm vs. 6.8 months in the T-DXd-arm. This effect was independent of hormone receptor status, prior pertuzumab treatment, visceral metastases, number of prior therapy lines and presence of brain metastases. ORR was doubled (34.2 vs. 79.7%), favouring the T-DXd arm.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
702
T-DXd i.v.
Chemotherapy+T+P
Klinikum Mittelbaden, Brustzentrum
Baden-Baden, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
RECRUITINGPraxis für Interdisziplinäre Onkologie und Hämatologie (PIO)
Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
RECRUITINGUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen
Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
RECRUITINGUniversitätsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Adverse drug reactions with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher, compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment
distant disease-free survival (dDFS, according to STEEP 2.0 criteria): T-DXd
dDFS in patients with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy (pooled experimental treatment arms of part 1, pooled cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: after 3 years
distant disease-free survival (dDFS, according to STEEP 2.0 criteria): CTx
in patients with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy followed by CHT (pooled experimental treatment arms of part 2, cohort 3)
Time frame: after 3 years
pCR rate after neoadjuvant treatment
defined as ypT0is/ypN0, compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy (pooled experimental treatment arms of part 1, pooled cohorts 1 and 2) compared to patients of corresponding standard-of-care treatments (DOC/PAC+T+P or DOC/PAC+Carbo+T+P) (pooled standard-of-care treatment arms of part 1, pooled cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: after 18 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment
distant disease-free survival (dDFS, according to STEEP 2.0 criteria): 18 weeks
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 3 years
distant disease-free survival (dDFS, according to STEEP 2.0 criteria): 12 weeks
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1) and patients treated with SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1) 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 3 years
distant disease-free survival (dDFS, according to STEEP 2.0 criteria): 12 plus 6 weeks
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 6 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 3 years
distant disease-free survival (dDFS, according to STEEP 2.0 criteria): 12 plus 12 weeks
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 3 years
distant disease-free survival (dDFS, according to STEEP 2.0 criteria)
in patients with pCR after neoadjuvant treatment without further chemotherapy: It should be tested whether 3-year dDFS of each arm exceeds 92% (literature data)
Time frame: after 3 years
pCR rate: 18 weeks
defined as ypTis/ypN0 in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
pCR rate: 12 weeks
defined as ypTis/ypN0 in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1) and patients treated with SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1)
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
pCR rate: 12 plus 12 weeks
defined as ypTis/ypN0 in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 24 weeks treatment
Clinical response after 6 weeks
defined as either cCR, cPR, cSD, after 6 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment compared between T-DXd treated patients and SoC treated patients
Time frame: after 6 weeks treatment
Clinical response after 12 weeks
defined as either cCR, cPR, cSD, after 12 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment compared between T-DXd treated patients and SoC treated patients
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
Clinical response after 24 weeks
defined as either cCR, cPR, cSD, after 24 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment compared between T-DXd treated patients and SoC treated patients
Time frame: after 24 weeks treatment
iDFS
survival endpoint STEEP 2.0
Time frame: at end of study
OS
survival endpoint STEEP 2.0
Time frame: at end of study
LRFS
survival endpoint STEEP 2.0
Time frame: at end of study
BCFS
survival endpoint STEEP 2.0
Time frame: at end of study
DRFI
survival endpoint STEEP 2.0
Time frame: at end of study
QOL
health-related quality of life
Time frame: after 1 year
adverse drug reaction with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher: 12 weeks mono
Number of ADR with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1) and patients treated with SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1)
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
adverse drug reaction with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher: 18 weeks combined
Number of ADR with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 6 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
adverse drug reaction with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher: 24 weeks combined
Number of ADR with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 24 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with any TEAE: 18 weeks mono
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with any TEAE: 12 weeks mono
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1 ) and patients treated with SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1)
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with any TEAE: 18 weeks combined
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 6 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with any TEAE: 24 weeks combined
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 24 weeks treatment
Frequency of TEAE: 12 weeks
in all T-DXd based neoadjuvant treatment regimens as well as in SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1)
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
Frequency of TEAE : 18 weeks
in all T-DXd based neoadjuvant treatment regimens as well as in SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with adverse event of special interest (AESI): 18 weeks mono
AESI) (interstitial lung disease, QT time prolongation, LVEF decrease, infusion related reactions) compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with adverse event of special interest (AESI): 12 weeks mono
AESI) (interstitial lung disease, QT time prolongation, LVEF decrease, infusion related reactions) compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1 ) and patients treated with SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort1 )
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with adverse event of special interest (AESI): 18 weeks combined
AESI) (interstitial lung disease, QT time prolongation, LVEF decrease, infusion related reactions) compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 6 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with adverse event of special interest (AESI): 24 weeks combined
AESI) (interstitial lung disease, QT time prolongation, LVEF decrease, infusion related reactions) compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 24 weeks treatment
Frequency of AESI in T-DXd
in all four T-DXd based neoadjuvant treatment regimens
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
Frequency of AESI in SoC: 12 weeks
in SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1)
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
Frequency of AESI in SoC: 18 weeks
in SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Hämotologisch onkologische Praxis Heinrich Bangerter Augsburg GbR
Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany
RECRUITINGUniversitätsklinikum Augsburg / Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe
Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany
RECRUITINGBreast Center of the University of Munich (LMU) Universitätsfrauenklinik
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
RECRUITINGRotkreuz Klinikum München
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
RECRUITINGKlinikum Bremerhaven Reinkenheide
Bremerhaven, Free Hanseatic City of Bremen, Germany
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGAGAPLESION Markus Krankenhaus Gynäkologie
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany
RECRUITING...and 34 more locations