This phase II trial tests how well olanzapine works in managing cancer cachexia in patients experiencing esophagogastric, hepatopancreaticobiliary, colorectal, or lung cancer that may have spread from where it first started to nearby tissue, lymph nodes, or distant parts of the body (advanced) or that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic) -associated appetite loss while receiving non-curative cancer therapy. Loss of appetite ("anorexia") in the setting of cancer is a key feature of "cachexia," a syndrome associated with loss of weight and muscle as well as weakness and fatigue. Olanzapine is a drug that targets key neurotransmitters (a type of molecule in the central nervous system that transmits messages to the rest of the body) that may stimulate appetite, restore caloric intake, minimize weight loss, and improve quality of life (QOL).
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To assess the impact of olanzapine 2.5 mg versus (vs) placebo on the proportion of patients with locally advanced or metastatic EG, HPB, or lung cancers receiving first-line systemic standard-of-care (SOC) therapy with \>5% weight gain over 12 weeks. (Part A) SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate the impact of olanzapine 2.5 mg and placebo vs olanzapine 5 mg on the proportion of patients with \>5% weight gain over 12 weeks. (Part A) II. To evaluate the impact of olanzapine 2.5 mg vs olanzapine 5 mg vs placebo on additional cancer cachexia-associated endpoints over 12 weeks (anorexia, nutritional status, physical function, patient-reported symptoms, QOL, safety and toxicity, and healthcare utilization) over 12 weeks. (Part A) OUTLINE: PART A: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 arms. All three arms have an optional baseline computed tomography (CT) scan (timed with standard-of-care imaging) at baseline and optional monthly blood sample collections. ARM I: Patients receive a lower (2.5 mg) dose of olanzapine orally (PO) nightly for 12 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients may choose to enroll in an additional 12 weeks of treatment (Part B). Patients may choose to participate to undergo CT scan and collection of blood samples on study. ARM II: Patients receive a higher (5 mg) dose of olanzapine PO nightly for 12 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients may choose to enroll in an additional 12 weeks of treatment. Patients may choose to participate to undergo CT scan and collection of blood samples on study. ARM III: Patients receive placebo PO nightly for 12 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients may choose to enroll in an additional 12 weeks of treatment. Patients may choose to participate to undergo CT scan and collection of blood samples on study. PART B: All patients receive a lower (2.5mg) dose of olanzapine PO nightly for 12 additional weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients may choose to participate in additional blood sample collections. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 week.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
66
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
Portland, Oregon, United States
RECRUITINGProportion of patients exhibiting weight gain greater 5%
\>5% weight gain comparing olanzapine 2.5mg (Arm I) vs. placebo (Arm III)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks from baseline
Change in Weight
\>5% weight gain comparing olanzapine 2.5 mg (Arm I) vs. olanzapine 5mg (Arm II) \>5% weight gain comparing olanzapine 5 mg (Arm II) vs. placebo (Arm III)
Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks from baseline
Anorexia
Patient reported anorexia comparing olanzapine 2.5 mg (Arm 1) vs. olanzapine 5 mg (Arm 2) vs. placebo (Arm 3) Anorexia will be measured using the Functional Assessment of Anorexia-Cachexia Therapy (FAACT), a 12-item subscale of patients' perceptions of appetite (maximum score of 48, higher scores indicate less anorexia). A FAACT score ≤ 37 indicates anorexia.
Time frame: At 12 weeks from baseline]
Appetite
Change in appetite will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale for appetite (VAS), a 10-point scale with a higher score indicating a better appetite. A ≥3-point improvement in appetite at the end of the 12-week placebo-controlled Part A as compared to baseline in each arm will be considered an improvement in appetite.
Time frame: Baseline up to 12 weeks from baseline
Nutrition
Nutritional Status will be measured using the Patient- Generated Subjective Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA-SF); scored on a scale of 0-36 with a higher score indicating worse malnutrition.
Time frame: At baseline and at 4, 8, 12 weeks from baseline
Physical Function
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status is a clinician's assessment of physical function rated 0 to 5 with a lower score indicating better performance.
Time frame: At baseline and at 4, 8, and12 weeks from baseline
Physical Function
Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) is a clinician assessed score (0-100) to evaluate physical function and ability to carry out daily activities. A higher score indicates better performance. \[Time Frame: At baseline and at 4, 8, 12 weeks from baseline\]
Time frame: At baseline and at 4, 8, and12 weeks from baseline
Physical Function
Tthe Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is a physical function assessment consisting of 3 timed measures and scored 0 to 12 with a higher score indicating better performance.
Time frame: At baseline and at 4, 8, and12 weeks from baseline
Patient Reported Quality of Life
Patient reported quality of life will be measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G,) consisting of four domains (physical, social, emotional, and functional) of well-being with scores ranging from 0 to 108 with higher scores indicating better QOL.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks from baseline
Patient-reported impression of change
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) is a 7-point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement in appetite and fatigue with a higher score indicating more improvement .
Time frame: At 12 weeks from baseline
Patient Reported Symptoms
Patient Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) will be used to capture symptoms associated with cancer cachexia and/or its treatment. Each response is scored from 0-4 with a higher score indicating more severity.
Time frame: At 4, 8, and 12 weeks from baseline
Incidence of adverse events
National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 5.
Time frame: At 4, 8, and 12 weeks from baseline
Proportion of patients with ≥1 unplanned hospitalization
Calculation and analysis of patients who have 1 or more unplanned hospitalization.
Time frame: At baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks from baseline
Proportion of patients with ≥1 emergency department visit
Health care utilization including emergency department visits, hospital admissions.
Time frame: At baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks from baseline
Proportion of patients with ≥1 unplanned hospitalization
Number of unplanned hospitalizations
Time frame: From baseline to 12 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.