This goal of this observational study is to develop and test the Opioid Risk Reduction Clinical Decision Support (ORRCDS) tool. The tool will be an opioid medication risk screener and decision support platform that will be used by pharmacists upon dispensing prescription opioid medication. Once the Opioid Risk Reduction has been developed, we will examine the impact of the ORRCDS within two divisions of a large chain retail pharmacy. Pharmacies will be randomized to using the Opioid Risk Reduction Clinical Decision Support (ORRCDS) tool or standard of care opioid dispensation. We hypothesize that patients at pharmacies randomized to the ORRCDS tool will be more likely to reduce their risk status to low or moderate compared to the patients at standard of care pharmacies.
In our previous research, patients have reported a willingness to answer questions and discuss opioid medication use with pharmacists in these settings. Therefore, community pharmacy settings are an underused resource with great promise for screening and engaging patients to reduce opioid medication misuse. Currently, prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMP) are the most available tool to pharmacists for monitoring opioid use among patients. As a result, PDMP users must rely on their "best judgment" in clinical decision-making and often provide patient care and referrals with a limited evidence base. The question of highest importance in the field of prescription medication misuse is: How can PDMP information/output be most usefully utilized for patient intervention within an evidence-based opioid risk reduction clinical decision support (ORRCDS) tool. This study will develop and test the Opioid Risk Reduction Clinical Decision Support (ORRCDS) tool and examining facilitators and barriers to sustainability and broader dissemination. The study is organized into 3 aims: Aim 1: ORRCDS Tool development which will include a universal opioid medication risk screener and decision support platform. Aim 2: Once the ORRCDS has been developed, we will conduct a type-1 cluster 2-arm randomized trial to examine the impact of the ORRCDS tool within two divisions of a large chain retail pharmacy. We hypothesize that patients with moderate or high opioid risk will be more likely to reduce risk status to low or moderate following ORRCDS implementation compared to standard care. Aim 3: Following the completion of the cluster randomized trial, qualitative interviews will be conducted with pharmacists and leaders from a large chain retail pharmacy and PDMP vendor about the potential barriers and facilitators to the sustainability (continued use at the stores in this project) and broader dissemination (implementation at other stores outside of those in this project) of the ORRCDS.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
80
Moderate risk patients will get brief motivational intervention for medication misuse and an offer of naloxone dispensation.
Those with high risk will receive a brief motivational intervention leading to warm handoff treatment linkage intervention to primary or specialty substance use care with an offer for naloxone dispensation.
Ohio State law requires pharmacist to not dispense an opioid supply \>90 days, with a specific prohibition on dispensations ≥14 days after prescriptions are issued. Pharmacists are also required to perform a universal prescription drug medication review before initial dispensation and offer brief counseling (e.g., unstandardized information about medication safety) for new/modified prescription therapies.
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Stage 1: Development of the Opioid Risk Reduction Clinical Decision Support (ORRCDS) tool
This outcome will be assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS).
Time frame: 24 months
Stage 2: Improvement in patient opioid-related risks
This outcome will be assessed using the Narcotic Score (NS).
Time frame: 24 months
Stage 3: ORRCDS sustainability within the system and pharmacy chain systems
Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research the investigators will interview staff from the PDMP vendor and large chain retail pharmacy to assesses the barriers of tool sustainability.
Time frame: 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.