The purpose of this study is to compare the 16/8 intermittent fasting method with the 5:2 Method in a subset of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma at BC Cancer- Victoria. The purpose is to find out which is the preferred method by patients and which has the greatest effect on: * cancer cells (lymphyocyte count), * metabolism (autophagy activation), * inflammation (CRP), * gut microbiome (metabolomic analysis). Participants will have already completed our previous trial, "Intermittent Fasting in CLL/SLL" (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04626843) where they followed the 16/8 Fasting Method followed by a minimum of a 3 months washout period, and will now follow the 5:2 Method for 90 days. The same samples and outcome measures will be collected in order to directly compare the two diets in the same patient cohort.
BACKGROUND: Interest in intermittent fasting (IF) is growing rapidly for its potential to improve health outcomes. IF is a diet regime that cycles between fasting and eating for a defined period. There are many variations of IF, most altering the length of the fasting window but some may include caloric restriction. The investigators are nearing completion a feasibility study on the effects of IF on chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) at BC Cancer- Victoria. This clinical trial, "IF in CLL/SLL" (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04626843) investigates the biochemical effects of the 16/8 Method on CLL/SLL tumor control, markers of inflammation, and autophagy induction in a case-controlled study. Preliminary findings demonstrate excellent compliance and early feedback and findings are overwhelmingly positive. It is unknown, however, how the 16/8 Method compares to other IF regimens in terms of patient acceptability and biologic effects. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to examine the two most common regimens, the 16/8 Method (16 hr fast) and the 5:2 Method (2 day per week of caloric restriction of 800 kcals). The primary research questions are, which IF strategy has the greatest effect on, (1) tumour burden (lymphocyte count), (2) autophagy induction and gut microbiome composition, (3) inflammation, (4) and is preferred by patients. METHODS: This study is an extension of the investigators' current, single-arm trial to expand to a case crossover design, allowing each participant to serve as their own control. Following completion of a 90 day trial on the 16/8 Method during the "Intermittent Fasting in CLL/SLL" study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04626843) and following a minimum of a 3 month washout period, participants will now follow the 5:2 Method for 90 days. Data collection will match previous current study protocol to allow for statistical comparison between lymphocyte count, inflammation, metabolomic profiles, autophagy status, and the gut microbiome (optional). Participants will complete a semi-structured interview on their experiences with the 16/8 Method and 5:2 Method that will be qualitatively analyzed.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
6
Participants will follow the 5:2 Method (an intermittent fasting regimen) for a 90 day duration. This entails eating ad libitum for five days per week ("normal days") and limiting total calorie intake to 800kcals per day ("fasting days") for the remaining two days per week. The fasting days can be sequential or dispersed throughout the week, based on patient preference.
Participants will have already followed the 16/8 Method (an intermittent fasting regimen) for a minimum of six days per week for a 90 day duration. This entailed limiting the eating hours to an 8-hour window, then fasting for the remaining 16 hours per day, with the last time of intake being 8pm.
Eleah Stringer
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Change in lymphocyte count [ Time Frame: Within 3 months pre-intervention, monthly during intervention, 1 month post-intervention ]
Changes in lymphocyte count will be measured between each peripheral blood draw and also compared to the former results as part of the "IF in CLL/SLL Study" (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04626843).
Time frame: Within 3 months pre-intervention, monthly during intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Change in inflammation
Changes in c-reactive protein (CRP) will be measured between each peripheral blood draw and also compared to the former results as part of the "IF in CLL/SLL Study" (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04626843).
Time frame: Within 3 months pre-intervention, monthly during intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Change in metabolomic profiles (optional)
Changes in abundance of stool metabolites will be measured between each stool sample and between the two interventional arms. This includes, but is not limited to, an established short-chain fatty acid and bile acid panel that analyzes 77 and 10 unique metabolites, respectively.
Time frame: Day 1 (start/baseline) and day 90 (end/final) of intervention
Change in autophagy status
This includes standard flow cytometric analysis of lymphocyte subsets: a panel established by the Human Immunology Consortium Project as well as additional in-house markers to enumerate the frequency of lymphocytes before and at various time points post-treatment. The extent of autophagy will be tested by performing cytometry and western blotting assays using LC3II and p62 as readouts. Total cell counts in different lymphocyte subsets including, but not limited to, cluster of differentiation (CD) 3, CD8, CD4, CD20, CD19, and forkhead box P3 (FoxP3) will be assayed in conjugation with glucose uptake and mitochondrial function.
Time frame: Time Frame: Within 3 months pre-intervention, monthly during intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Changes in immune cell gene expression profiles
Changes in expression profiles of selected immune cell genes
Time frame: Time Frame: Within 3 months pre-intervention, monthly during intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Change in gut microbiome (optional)
Stool samples to identify baseline and fasting-induced changes in abundance and repertoire of the gut microbiota.
Time frame: Day 1 (start/baseline) and day 90 (end/final) of intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.