The purpose of this study is to compare two methods for managing obesity in rural primary care patients. The first method includes quarterly 1:1 meetings with the participant and their primary care provider and the second includes a group lifestyle intervention over Zoom paired with quarterly team meetings with the participant, their primary care provider and their lifestyle coach, the coach joining via Zoom. Investigators will evaluate which method is best at helping participants lose weight over 18 months.
Obesity increases risk for 13 types of cancer and now affects over 40% of the U.S. adult population, with even higher prevalence among rural Americans. Rural residents often lack access to weight control programs and food and physical activity resources that promote healthy lifestyles, especially in small or remote rural areas. It is important for obesity treatment to be offered in rural primary care, yet local resources are often lacking. Medical management by a primary care provider (PCP) during behavioral weight loss is essential to address co-morbid medical conditions, evaluate obesogenic medications, and explore options for guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy and surgical treatment. This study is designed to enhance sustainable access to obesity treatment in rural communities by offering education to local providers on obesity management and integrating team-based care into an obesity treatment model through telemedicine. The two methods of obesity treatment to be studied are: * Local Care + Arm: Quarterly clinic visits with the participants and their local primary care provider * Team Care Arm: An intensive group lifestyle intervention offered by a lifestyle coach via Zoom, paired with quarterly clinic visits with the participant, their local primary care provider and the lifestyle coach, the coach joining via telemedicine. Participants will be in the study about 18 months. Participants in the Local Care + arm will be asked to complete 4 data collection visits and 6 quarterly clinic visits. Participants in the Team Care arm will be asked to complete 4 data collection visits, 30 counseling sessions and 6 quarterly clinic visits.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Local primary care providers receive training in medical management of obesity prior to the start of the participant intervention. Participants receive 6 quarterly clinic visits with their local primary care provider focused on medical management of obesity.
Local primary care providers receive training in medical management of obesity prior to the start of the participant intervention. Participants receive an intensive 18-month group lifestyle intervention (30 total sessions) led by a study lifestyle coach via Zoom, and 6 quarterly 1:1 visits via Zoom with their lifestyle coach. Participants also receive 6 quarterly clinic visits with their local primary care provider; the study lifestyle coach joins the visits via telemedicine. All three parties may meet via telemedicine if needed. The group lifestyle intervention is led by obesity treatment specialists with relevant graduate training and experience.
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Percent weight loss at 18 months
Mean percent weight loss at 18 months; unadjusted
Time frame: 18 months
Percent weight loss at 6 months
Mean percent weight loss at 6 months; unadjusted
Time frame: 6 months
Percent weight loss at 12 months
Mean percent weight loss at 12 months; unadjusted
Time frame: 12 months
Weight loss (kg) at 6 months
Mean weight loss (kg) at 6 months; unadjusted
Time frame: 6 months
Weight loss (kg) at 12 months
Mean weight loss (kg) at 12 months; unadjusted
Time frame: 12 months
Weight loss (kg) at 18 months
Mean weight loss (kg) at 18 months; unadjusted
Time frame: 18 months
Proportion achieving ≥5% weight loss at 6 months
Proportion achieving ≥5% weight loss at 6 months; unadjusted
Time frame: 6 months
Proportion achieving ≥5% weight loss at 12 months
Proportion achieving ≥5% weight loss at 12 months; unadjusted
Time frame: 12 months
Proportion achieving ≥5% weight loss at 18 months
Proportion achieving ≥5% weight loss at 18 months; unadjusted
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
560
Time frame: 18 months
Proportion achieving ≥10% weight loss at 6 months
Proportion achieving ≥10% weight loss at 6 months; unadjusted
Time frame: 6 months
Proportion achieving ≥10% weight loss at 12 months
Proportion achieving ≥10% weight loss at 12 months; unadjusted
Time frame: 12 months
Proportion achieving ≥10% weight loss at 18 months
Proportion achieving ≥10% weight loss at 18 months; unadjusted
Time frame: 18 months
Change in diet quality at 6 months
Mean change in diet quality, measured by Rapid Eating Assessment for Participant--Shortened Version (REAPS) at 6 months; unadjusted. The REAPS estimates diet quality through 13 items which assess weekly eating habits. Possible scores range from 13 (worst diet quality) to 39 (best diet quality).
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in diet quality at 12 months
Mean change in diet quality, measured by Rapid Eating Assessment for Participant--Shortened Version (REAPS) at 12 months; unadjusted. The REAPS estimates diet quality through 13 items which assess weekly eating habits. Possible scores range from 13 (worst diet quality) to 39 (best diet quality).
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Change in diet quality at 18 months
Mean change in diet quality, measured by Rapid Eating Assessment for Participant--Shortened Version (REAPS) at 18 months; unadjusted. The REAPS estimates diet quality through 13 items which assess weekly eating habits. Possible scores range from 13 (worst diet quality) to 39 (best diet quality).
Time frame: Baseline and 18 months
Change in physical activity at 6 months
Mean change in MET-HOURS per week measured by Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ) at 6 months; unadjusted. The MAQ will be used to measure participants' leisure-time physical activity over the past 7 days. Leisure-time physical activity will be calculated as the Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) hours per week (MET-hr/week) and estimated by multiplying time (in hours) spent in an activity by the activities estimated MET and summing across all activities.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in physical activity at 12 months
Mean change in MET-HOURS per week measured by Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ) at 12 months; unadjusted. The MAQ will be used to measure participants' leisure-time physical activity over the past 7 days. Leisure-time physical activity will be calculated as the Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) hours per week (MET-hr/week) and estimated by multiplying time (in hours) spent in an activity by the activities estimated MET and summing across all activities.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Change in physical activity at 18 months
Mean change in MET-HOURS per week measured by Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ) at 18 months; unadjusted. The MAQ will be used to measure participants' leisure-time physical activity over the past 7 days. Leisure-time physical activity will be calculated as the Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) hours per week (MET-hr/week) and estimated by multiplying time (in hours) spent in an activity by the activities estimated MET and summing across all activities.
Time frame: Baseline and 18 months
Change in physical quality of life at 6 months
Mean change in physical quality of life, measured by SF-12 at 6 months; unadjusted. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) is a general quality of life measure with a physical functioning summary score. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in physical quality of life at 12 months
Mean change in physical quality of life, measured by SF-12 at 12 months; unadjusted. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) is a general quality of life measure with a physical functioning summary score. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Change in physical quality of life at 18 months
Mean change in physical quality of life, measured by SF-12 at 18 months; unadjusted. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) is a general quality of life measure with a physical functioning summary score. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline and 18 months
Change in mental quality of life at 6 months
Mean change in mental quality of life, measured by SF-12 at 6 months; unadjusted. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) is a general quality of life measure with a mental functioning summary score. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in mental quality of life at 12 months
Mean change in mental quality of life, measured by SF-12 at 12 months; unadjusted. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) is a general quality of life measure with a mental functioning summary score. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Change in mental quality of life at 18 months
Mean change in mental quality of life, measured by SF-12 at 18 months; unadjusted. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) is a general quality of life measure with a mental functioning summary score. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline and 18 months
Change in weight-related quality of life at 6 months
Mean change in total quality of life, measured by Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-L) at 6 months; unadjusted. The IWQOL-L measure consists of a total score and five subscales--physical function, self-esteem, sexual life, public distress, and work. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change in weight-related quality of life at 12 months
Mean change in total quality of life, measured by Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-L) at 12 months; unadjusted. The IWQOL-L measure consists of a total score and five subscales--physical function, self-esteem, sexual life, public distress, and work. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Change in weight-related quality of life at 18 months
Mean change in total quality of life, measured by Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-L) at 18 months; unadjusted. The IWQOL-L measure consists of a total score and five subscales--physical function, self-esteem, sexual life, public distress, and work. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and 18 months