This is a non randomized pilot trial aimed to: Test the feasibility of an intervention to support intensive care unit clinicians in conducting shared decision making conversations with families of patients with acute respiratory failure. The goal of this intervention is to mitigate racial disparities in shared decision making.
The care of critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure involves life-or-death decisions. Ideally, intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians should include patients or their families in shared decision making, which promotes goal-concordant care (i.e., care aligned with patients' preferences), reduces psychological distress for both families and clinicians, and shortens ICU length of stay. However, racial disparities have been documented in shared decision making and associated outcomes. In outpatient settings, clinicians treat Black patients differently from White patients, providing fewer treatment options, less prognostic information, and less emotional support, and making assumptions about rather than eliciting patient preferences. Disparities in shared decision making are likely to be amplified in the ICU because clinicians often do not have long-standing relationships with patients or families, and decisions are complex, emotional, and time-pressured. Yet, no interventions currently exist to address racial disparities in shared decision making about acute respiratory failure. This research will directly fill this gap.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
106
Physicians will view tip sheets containing best practices for shared decision making with diverse families.
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Intervention acceptability as measured by single Likert-scaled item completed by physicians
Likert-scaled single item, ranging from 1 (not acceptable) to 5 (completely acceptable)
Time frame: within 96 hours of signing study consent
Demand for the intervention measured by the proportion of physicians who viewed the intervention
Percentage of physicians who viewed intervention by email "read" receipts, range 0 to 100%
Time frame: within 96 hours of signing study consent
Fidelity to intervention measured by proportion of tip sheet phrases used by physicians
Proportion of tip sheet phrases used in family meeting as determined by review of audio-recorded family meeting, range 0 to 100%
Time frame: within 96 hours of signing study consent
Practicality as measured by proportion of screen eligible participants enrolled per month
Proportion screen eligible enrolled/month based on review of study logs, range 0 to 100%
Time frame: through study completion, up to 1 year
Practicality as measured by time to complete physician or family surveys
Time to complete physician or family surveys as measured by review of study logs, range 0 to 60 minutes
Time frame: within 96 hours of signing study consent
Practicality as measured by dropout rate from study
Dropout rate as ascertained by review of study logs, range 0 to 100%
Time frame: through study completion, up to 1 year
Decisional regret among families, measured by Decision Regret Scale
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Decision Regret Scale, range 5 (low regret) to 25 (high regret)
Time frame: within 96 hours of signing study consent
Psychological distress among families, measured by Impact of Events Revised scale
Impact of Events revised scale, range 0 (low stress) to 88 (extreme stress)
Time frame: within 96 hours of signing study consent
Psychological distress among physicians, measured by moral distress scale
Moral distress scale, range 0 (low distress) to 84 (extreme distress)
Time frame: within 96 hours of signing study consent
Components of shared decision making, as measured by content analysis of family meeting recordings
A qualitative data analysis of transcripts from family-physician meetings using 14-item shared decision making framework from PMID 20642362, range 0 (poor shared decision making) to 14 (ideal shared decision making)
Time frame: through study completion, up to 1 year
Decisional conflict among families, measured by Decisional Conflict Scale
Decisional Conflict Scale, range 0 (low conflict) to 64 (high conflict)
Time frame: within 96 hours of signing study consent
ICU utilization among patients, as measured by length of stay
ICU length of stay ascertained from electronic medical record review
Time frame: through study completion, up to 1 year