The goal of this randomized, placebo-controlled, three-condition, double-blind, within-participants crossover clinical trial is to compare caffeine, TeaCrine plus caffeine, and a placebo condition in ROTC or tactical personnel. The main question it aims to answer is the effect of the condition on measures of cognitive performance, cardio-autonomic, and hemodynamic responses after a physically demanding protocol. The physiological function will be derived from metrics of heart rate variability, whilst cogntive performance will be evaluated using tasks that assess cognitive domains of executive function, reaction time, and memory. Participants will report to the lab 4 times, once for familiarization of cognitive measures and then 3 times for their experimental visits. Participants will consume their randomized condition an hour prior to the fatiguing interval exercise protocol. Following they will complete a series of cognitive tasks.
The purpose of this randomized, placebo-controlled, three-condition, double-blind, within-participants crossover clinical trial is to determine and compare the effects of the combination of TeaCrine® and caffeine to a placebo and a caffeine condition on measures of cognitive performance, cardio-autonomic, and hemodynamic responses after a physically demanding protocol. After giving informed consent, 20 ROTC members or tactical personnel will undergo baseline performance testing and familiarization and will then be randomly assigned to order of completion of the placebo (P), caffeine (C) condition, and caffeine + TeaCrine (CT) condition, with each session separated by at least 96 hours. In each condition, Participants will be given the condition pill assigned to them, the pill will be taken orally with water, and will wait 60 minutes. At this time, the Participant will complete a treadmill-based physically fatiguing interval protocol with select cognitive testing during the exercise recovery intervals. Participant measures of mental fatigue will be assessed pre- and post-testing, and following the interval bout participants will perform a series of cognitive tasks. Heart rate variability (HRV) and respiration will be assessed continuously though these tasks and blood pressure will be assessed at baseline, prior to the exercise bout, immediately following the exercise bout, and following the cognitive testing.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
23
Participants will take Teacrine and caffeine then an hour later perform an intense interval exercise protocol followed by cognitive tests.
Participants will take caffeine then an hour later perform an intense interval exercise protocol followed by cognitive tests.
Participants will take the placebo cellulose pill and than an hour later perform an intense interval exercise protocol followed by cognitive tests.
University of South Carolina Sport Science Lab
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Changes in blood lactate
Changes in blood lactate across the experimental visit
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: Min 0 prior to the exercise protocol, minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, 5 min after the protocol (min 35), 10 minutes post exercise (min 40)
Changes in Autonomic Nervous System Function (ANS) by linear metrics
To determine if the intervention impacts ANS function by measuring heart rate variability represented by linear time domain metrics.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days, this will be measured on a second by second basis from the beginning to the end of the visit (approximately 2 hours)
Changes in Autonomic Nervous System Function (ANS) by nonlinear metrics
To determine if the intervention has an impact on ANS function by measuring heart rate variability represented by nonlinear (ApSaEn) time domain metric.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days, this will be measured on a second by second basis from the beginning to the end of the visit (approximately 2 hours)
Changes in Autonomic Nervous System Function (ANS) by frequency domain metrics
To determine if the intervention has an impact on ANS function by measuring heart rate variability represented by frequency domain metrics.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days, this will be measured on a second by second basis from the beginning to the end of the visit (approximately 2 hours)
Changes in Inhibitory Control by reaction time (Go/No go)
To determine if the intervention has an impact on inhibitory control by measuring reaction time to Go targets (hits).
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in Inhibitory Control by reaction time by errors(Go/No go)
To determine if the intervention has an impact on inhibitory control by measuring errors of commission representing incorrect responses to the target NoGo (false alarm).
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in Attention (Go/No go)
To determine if the device has an impact on attention by measuring errors of omission to the target Go (misses).
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in Inhibitory Control by accuracy scores (Flanker Task)
To determine if the intervention has an impact on inhibitory control measured by the accuracy scores (% of correct answers) for compatible-congruent, incompatible-congruent, compatible-incongruent, and incompatible-incongruent Flanker Task trials.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in Inhibitory Control by average response time (Flanker Task)
To determine if the intervention has an impact on inhibitory control measured by the average response time to incongruent flanker task trials irrespective of compatible or incompatible rule sets.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in Inhibitory Control by commission errors (Flanker Task)
o determine if the intervention has an impact on inhibitory control measured by the commission errors when an individual fails to respond correctly to a flanker task trial, and commission error runs when an individual fails to respond correctly to multiple successive trials.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in Attention by accuracy (Flanker Task)
To determine if the intervention has an impact on attention measured by the accuracy scores for congruent-compatible Flanker task trials.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in Attention by average response time (Flanker Task)
To determine if the intervention has an impact on attention measured by the overall average response time (milliseconds) to compatible and incompatible Flanker task trails irrespective of trial congruency.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in Attention by omission errors (Flanker Task)
To determine if the intervention has an impact on attention measured by the omission errors when an individual fails to respond to a flanker task trial, and omission error runs when an individual fails to respond to multiple successive trials.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in Cognitive flexibility by accuracy (Flanker Task)
To determine if the intervention has an impact on cognitive flexibility by the accuracy scores for incongruent-incompatible Flanker task trials.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in Cognitive flexibility by average response time (Flanker Task)
To determine if the intervention has an impact on cognitive flexibility measured by the average response time to incongruent-incompatible flanker task trials.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in Cognitive control by post-error accuracy (Flanker Task)
To determine if the intervention has an impact on cognitive control measured by post-error accuracy on Flanker task trials following an error.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in Cognitive control by sequential congruency effect (Flanker Task)
To determine changes in cognitive control measured by sequential congruency effect when lower interference occurs following an incongruent relative to a congruent flanker task trial reflecting a consciously controlled narrowing of attention to the central target.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in Cognitive control by inverse efficiency (Flanker Task)
To determine if the intervention has an impact on cognitive control measured by inverse efficiency a metric of a speed-accuracy trade-off for Flanker task trials.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in Attentional Inhibition (Flanker Task)
To determine if the intervention has an impact on attentional inhibition measured by congruency interference representing the costs associated with the interference demands associated with incongruent vs congruent flanker task trials.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in Rating of Perceived Exertion
To determine if the intervention has an effect on perceived exertion, measured by Borg's Rating of Perceived Exertion scale from 6 to 20. Higher measures indicate more exertion.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: baseline at minute 0, minutes 10, 22, and 30 during the exercise protocol, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol
Changes in mood Brunel University Mood Scale (BRUMS).
To determine if the intervention has an effect on mental fatigue and mood.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: baseline at minute 0, immediately after completion of the exercise protocol at approximately 90 minutes into the visit, and 30 minutes after the exercise protocol approximately 120 minutes into the visit
Changes in Object Hit and Avoid
To determine the effects of the intervention on rapid response execution and inhibition during complex continuous task performance.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: Immediately after and 30 minutes after the completion of the exercise protocol.
Changes in Anti-Saccade Task
To determine the effects of the intervention on higher level processes, assessing response inhibition, working memory, and visuospatial attention.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: Immediately after and 30 minutes after the completion of the exercise protocol.
Changes in Modified Trail Making Task
To determine the effects of the intervention on visuomotor processing and executive function.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: Immediately after and 30 minutes after the completion of the exercise protocol.
Changes in 2-Back Task
The determine the effects of the intervention on working memory capacity.
Time frame: On the experimental visit days: Immediately after and 30 minutes after the completion of the exercise protocol.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.