A prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial studying the management of symptomatic ureteral stones. This study will compare upfront ureteroscopy vs observation and delayed intervention for patients presenting to the emergency department with a symptomatic ureteral stone.
Management of symptomatic ureteral stones is variable across the United States due to a lack of clear, patient-centered guidelines. For patients who do not meet criteria for emergent stenting, the decision to recommend upfront definitive treatment (ureteroscopy, ESWL) or medical expulsion therapy is influenced by factors such as practice setting, insurance status, and day of the week. This has resulted in health disparities and delays in care that disproportionately affect vulnerable patient populations. For patients presenting to the emergency department with a symptomatic ureteral stone investigators will randomize into Group A: Upfront Ureteroscopy or Group B: Delayed intervention and observation. Both arms are considered standard of care for patients presenting with the above diagnosis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
Upfront ureteroscopy
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
RECRUITINGPain Score
Measure on a scale of 1-10, with zero indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain.
Time frame: 3 months
Anxiety Score
Measure on a scale of 1-10, the score ranges from 0-10, with zero indicating no anxiety and 10 indicating the worst anxiety.
Time frame: 3 months
Hospital visit length
Measured in number of days
Time frame: 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.