The aim of this interventional study is thus to assess and highlight the cognitive, physical, and psychosocial benefits of a combined physical and cognitive training program in an enriched environment and to assess the factors influencing these benefits.
The number of older people worldwide is constantly increasing. However, one of the main problems associated with aging is cognitive decline, which affects essential everyday functions such as memory, attention, and executive functions. Thus, maintaining autonomy and quality of life depends on physical health, and the integrity of cognitive functioning. Cognitive, physical and social activities can all slow this decline but social factors and their contribution to the well-being of older people remain under-researched. The aim of the present study is to analyze how the practice environment can foster these social relations and thus enhance wellbeing and to identify the psychological dimensions that are activated by social relations.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
172
All participants will complete 12-week training sessions combining physical and cognitive activities, with two 1-hour sessions per week.
University of Poitiers
Poitiers, France
Change from baseline Score at Trail Making Test (TMT)
Score at cognitive flexibility function. higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at Stroop task
Score at cognitive inhibition function. higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at N-Back task
Score at working memory updating. Higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Score at basic cognitive functions. Higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at letter comparison test (XO test)
Score at processing-speed of information. Higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at Remember-Know paradigm
Score at episodic memory. Higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at 16-item Free and Cued Recall
Score at episodic memory. Higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Score at Mill-Hill vocabulary test
Score at crystallized intelligence. Higher scores mean a better outcome
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Inclusion
Change from baseline Score at Social Provisions Scale [SPS-10; score: 10-40]. (self-report questionnaire)
Perceived social support Score (attachment, social integration, confirmation of one's value, material help, orientation) (self-assessment). Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale [EES-10; score: 10-40] (self-report questionnaire)
Perceived self-esteem Score (self-assessment). Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at French Achievement Goals Questionnaire for Sport and Exercise (QFBASEP) (self-report questionnaire)
Goal of motivation for physical activity (self-assessment)
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at 5-item World Health Organization well-being index [WHO-5; score: 0-100] (self-report questionnaire)
Perceived well-being Score (self-assessment). Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at Mental Health Continuum Short Form [MHC-SF; score: 0-70] (self-report questionnaire)
Perceived emotional, social and psychological well-being Score (self-assessment). Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at anxiety item on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS; score: 0-21] (self-report questionnaire)
Anxiety Score (self-assessment). higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at depression item on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS; score: 0-21] (self-report questionnaire)
Depression Score (self-assessment). higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Semi-structured interview
Assessment of social and cultural life, and assessment of interactions and relations with group members or teachers: "How would you describe your social and cultural life now?", "How the sessions with the other members of the group going?"
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at level of physical activity and sedentary lifestyle questionnaire (ONAPS)
Level of physical activity and sedentary lifestyle
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at Dynamic balance and walking speed with Time Up and Go test
Dynamic balance and walking speed. A shorter time means a better result
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at 30-second Chair Stand Test
Score at lower body strength. Higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at arm Curl Test
Score at upper body strength. Higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months
Change from baseline Score at six Minutes' Walk Test (6MWT)
Aerobic capacity. Higher distance traveled means a better result
Time frame: inclusion; 6 weeks; 12weeks; 9 months