The purpose of this study is to compare the Microendoscopic combined with ultrasound technique to the standard routinely used X-ray guided transforaminal steroid injection technique.
After being informed about the study and potential risks, all patients giving written informed consent will undergo screening to determine eligibility. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomized in a double-blind manner to two groups. Patients assigned to Group A will undergo a fluoroscopy guided procedure while patients in Group B will undergo a microendoscopic combined with ultrasound technique.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
124
Ultrasound-guided microendoscopic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection
Fluoroscopy-guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection.
American University of Beirut Medical Center
Beirut, Lebanon
Intervention success rate
The success of the procedure would be indicated by a questionnaire (yes/no answer). This includes the success of visualization under ultrasound and the insertion of the needle within the target position.
Time frame: During the procedure.
Patient satisfaction
Patient satisfaction towards the procedure is indicated on NRS scale (0-10).
Time frame: 3 weeks after discharge.
NRS pain score
Pain score will be assessed on NRS scale from 0-10.
Time frame: Before procedure, 30 minutes after the procedure, 1 week and 3 weeks after the procedure.
Complications
Intravascular injection, intraneural injection, subarachnoid injection and patient discomfort.
Time frame: During procedure.
Procedure time
Time taken to complete the procedure.
Time frame: Beginning of procedure till the end.
Ultrasound visibility
Visualization of the radicular artery and visualization of the nerve root (yes/no answer)
Time frame: During procedure.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.