The study aims at comparing two different approaches for vertical soft tissue augmentation at implant sites exhibiting soft tissue dehiscences: autogenous connective tissue graft vs acellular dermal matrix + enamel matrix derivative
The present randomized clinical trial aims at investigating two approaches (autogenous connective tissue graft vs acellular dermal matrix + enamel matrix derivative) when performed for vertical soft tissue augmentation at sites with peri-implant soft tissue dehiscences. Clinical, volumetric, ultrasonographic, and patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated at different time points up to 1 year.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
28
Vertical soft tissue augmentation with autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG)
Vertical soft tissue augmentation with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and enamel matrix derivative (EMD)
Harvard School of Dental Medicine
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
RECRUITINGChange in Soft tissue dehiscence depth
Change of the depth of the Soft tissue dehiscence (vertical measurement of the complication, in relation to the level of the cemento-enamel junction of the contralateral homologous tooth) at 12 months compared to baseline (expressed in millimeters)
Time frame: 12 months
Complete peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence (PSTD) coverage
Percentage of cases with complete resolution of the implant esthetic complication (expressed as a percentage)
Time frame: 12 months
mean peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence (PSTD) coverage
Percentage of coverage of the soft tissue dehiscence compared to baseline, measured with a formula considering final PSTD depth and initial PSTD depth (expressed as a percentage)
Time frame: 12 months
Mucosal thickness changes
Changes within the mucosal thickness measured with ultrasonography (expressed in mm)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months
3D Volumetric changes
Changes within the buccal contour measured by superimposing digital impressions obtained with optical scanning (expressed in mm\^3)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months
Post-operative pain
Patient-reported pain after the surgical procedure (expressed with a 0-10 visual analogue scale \[VAS\])
Time frame: 14 days after the surgery
Professional esthetic assessment (IDES)
Esthetic outcomes of the treatment assessed by a calibrated operator using the Implant soft tissue Dehiscence coverage Esthetic Score (IDES) (expressed using points, based on the IDES classification system from Zucchelli et al. 2021) The range is from 0 (worst outcome) to 10 (best outcome)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 12 months