The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on blood pressure in individuals with an acute spinal cord injury (within 30 days of injury). Blood pressure instability, specifically orthostatic hypotension (a drop in blood pressure when moving lying flat on your back to an upright position), appears early after the injury and often significantly interferes with participation in the critical rehabilitation time period. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Can optimal spinal stimulation increase blood pressure and resolve orthostatic symptoms (such as dizziness and nausea) when individuals undergo an orthostatic provocation (a sit-up test)? Optimal stimulation and sham stimulation (which is similar to a placebo treatment) will be compared. 2. What are the various spinal sites and stimulation parameters that can be used to increase and stabilize blood pressure to the normal range of 110-120 mmHg? Participants will undergo orthostatic tests (lying on a bed that starts out flat and then moved into an upright seated position by raising the head of bed by 90° and dropping the base of the bed by 90° from the knee) with optimal and sham stimulation, and their blood pressure measurements will be evaluated and compared.
Blood pressure (BP) control in persons with a spinal cord injury (SCI) is often impaired, resulting in short and long-term health complications and a decline in quality of life. Cardiovascular (CV) dysfunction develops early after SCI and often continues a lifetime. Orthostatic hypotension (OH), a 20/10 mmHg decrease in systolic/diastolic BP when moving from a supine to an upright position, is especially prevalent in the early phase, and frequently accompanied by symptoms of dizziness, weakness, fatigue, and syncope. Affecting up to 75% of therapy treatments during inpatient rehabilitation, OH significantly interferes with participation during the critical rehab time-period, especially as length of stay in rehabilitation has substantially shortened in the past decades. The compelling rationale for early identification and treatment of OH is met by several pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, however, the majority have limited effect, and increase the risk of adverse drug effects due to polypharmacy. In recent years, epidural and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation has been explored with promising results as a potential treatment to CV dysfunction in SCI. To date, only individuals with a chronic SCI (\>1 year) were included in these studies. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation (scTS) on BP in individuals with an acute/sub-acute SCI (7-30 days after injury), during their inpatient rehabilitation. Optimal stimulation sites and parameters that increase and stabilize systolic BP (SBP) within the normotensive range (110-120 mmHg) during an orthostatic challenge will be sought. In this crossover randomized controlled trial (RCT), the effect of optimal CV stimulation and sham stimulation on BP and orthostatic symptoms will be assessed and compared. The information gleaned from this work will allow design and implementation of scTS interventions in the early phase following an SCI, allowing full participation in inpatient rehabilitation programs, which are often hindered by the patients' autonomic dysfunction.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
12
Designed to invoke an orthostatic response. It begins with the participants lying supine on a specialized bed. The bed is then converted into a chair by raising the head of the bed by 90° and dropping the base of the bed by 90° from the knee. This position will be maintained for 15 minutes, while hemodynamic measures are continuously recorded. Some of these sessions will be accompanied by spinal stimulation.
Transcutaneous stimulation of the spinal cord. Two days of mapping will be performed to determine sites for modulation of blood pressure. During each day, with the participant in a supine or seated position, electrodes will be placed on the midline of one of the following spinous processes: C3/4, C5/6, C7/T1, T7/8, T11/12, L1/2 and S1/2. Stimulation intensity will start at 5 mA and gradually increase by 5 mA increments up to 100 mA. The frequency will be two or 30 Hz.
Based on the mapping sessions, profiles will be established to guide the selection of an optimal site location for blood pressure modulation (within the range of 110-120 mmHg).
Based on the mapping sessions, a profile that does not elicit a significant blood pressure response, will be used for the sham stimulation.
Kessler Foundation
West Orange, New Jersey, United States
RECRUITINGOptimal stimulation sites
Identify scTS spinal segments that restore systolic BP within the normotensive range (110-120 mmHg).
Time frame: Through Mapping and testing sessions, average of 2 weeks
Optimal stimulation frequency
Identify scTS frequency that restores systolic BP within the normotensive range (110-120 mmHg).
Time frame: Through Mapping and testing sessions, average of 2 weeks
Systolic blood pressure measurements (mmHg) - Mean and SD of beat-to-beat BP
A comparison of systolic blood pressure with no stimulation, sham or optimal stimulation during an orthostatic challenge will be performed to assess the efficacy of stimulation.
Time frame: Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
Change in Orthostatic symptoms when stimulation is applied
A questionnaire ranking the severity of orthostatic symptoms (dizziness, nausea), using a scale of 1-10 (10 being the most severe), will be conducted during an orthostatic test to assess the efficacy of stimulation and compare the effects of optimal and sham stimulation.
Time frame: Will be performed every 5 minutes during the orthostatic tests, average of 2 weeks
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain
Adverse effects will be recorded to assess the safety of stimulation. A numerical scale of 0 to 10 (with 10 meaning the worst pain) will be used to monitor any pain symptoms associated with the stimulation
Time frame: Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
Skin integrity assessment
Adverse effects will be recorded to assess the safety of stimulation. Skin integrity (skin irritation or breakdown caused by electrodes, wires or adhesive tape) will be assessed on a daily basis
Time frame: Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
Feasibility of applying scTS in inpatient settings - compliance
The ratio of total number of completed sessions divided by the number of sessions initially planned.
Time frame: Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
Feasibility of applying scTS in inpatient settings - session duration
The length of time of each session and total length will be recorded.
Time frame: Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
Feasibility of applying scTS in inpatient settings - effect on therapy
Total therapy time during inpatient rehabilitation will be recorded to ensure there is no interruption to the normal therapy schedule.
Time frame: Throughout the experiment, average of 2 weeks
Electromyography (EMG) of leg muscles - muscle activation (analysis of mean and peak amplitudes)
Analysis of leg-muscle EMG to identify configurations that modulate BP without eliciting motor activity, ensuring that BP response was not due to lower limb muscle contraction
Time frame: Through Mapping and testing sessions, average of 2 weeks
Additional hemodynamic measure - diastolic blood pressure
These measures will be collected on a daily basis throughout the trial
Time frame: throughout the trial, average of 2 weeks
Additional hemodynamic measure - heart rate
These measures will be collected on a daily basis throughout the trial
Time frame: throughout the trial, average of 2 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.