This is a pre-market, explorative, early feasibility, pilot, controlled clinical investigation designed to collect initial clinical data on the medical device Previct Drugs.
This first study will give valuable information on the feasibility of Previct Drugs function to measure pupils and eye movements and to evaluate if there are any changes in the pupillometric parameters before and after intake of a medicinal product. It will also provide information on the usability of the device. Drug intake will in this first investigation be simulated by a controlled single application of commonly therapeutically used medicinal products from the following classes of drugs: phenethylamines (D1), benzodiazepines (D2), cannabinoids (D3), and opioids (D4).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
48
Previct Drugs is a new non CE-marked eHealth system intended to be used for future monitoring and treatment of patients with substance use disorder (SUD). Previct Drugs consists of an application (app) to be installed on a smartphone, a web-based careportal to be accessed from a computer by the healthcare professional for administration and access of registered data, and a database for storage, handling, and analysis of reported data. Previct Drugs is intended to be used by healthcare professionals and patients within treatment of SUD.
Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) Department of Anesthesiology
Leiden, Netherlands
Use of Self-administered Pupillometry Using a Mobile Phone Application Can be Used to Collect Pupillograms Before and Under the Influence of Phenethylamines, Benzodiazepines, Cannabinoids, and Opioids (D1-D4).
For each medicinal product (D1-D4), the fraction of collected pupillometry data from the mobile phone application at baseline and under the influence of D1-D4, which can be transformed into pre-defined key features using native pupillogram. A key feature represents an eye characteristic (such as pupil size, iris position, and the similar). A successful transformation is characterised by underlying quality control algorithms approving the extracted magnitude, where poor quality pupillograms are rejected from analysis. Each attempt to transform a pupillogram into key features is denoted an "Attempt", and the successful transformation is denoted a "Successful attempt".
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Use of Self-administered Pupillometry Using a Mobile Phone Application, After Refining the Method for Establishing Pupillograms, Can be Used to Collect Pupillograms Before and Under the Influence of Each Medicinal Product (D1-D4).
For each medicinal product (D1-D4), the fraction of collected pupillometry data from the mobile phone application at baseline and under the influence of D1-D4, which can be transformed into pre-defined key features using refined pupillogram. A key feature represents an eye characteristic (such as pupil size, iris position, and the similar). A successful transformation is characterised by underlying quality control algorithms approving the extracted magnitude, where poor quality pupillograms are rejected from analysis. Each attempt to transform a pupillogram into key features is denoted an "Attempt", and the successful transformation is denoted a "Successful attempt.
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Number of Key Features With Change From Baseline to Peak Concentration in Plasma, Using Refined Pupillograms.
For each medicinal product (D1-D4), number of changed key features from baseline to the LC-MS/MS (Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass-Spectroscopy) verified peak concentration in plasma after administration of medicinal product at visit 2 using refined pupillograms. Each of the 24 key features represents an eye characteristic (such as pupil size, iris position, and the similar). A key feature is considered "changed" if the difference between averages at baseline and peak concentration is significant (p\<0.05). Key features were available from two conditions, one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in dim ambient light (50 Lux) and one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in bright ambient light (500 Lux). The Outcome Measure is reported for both ambient light conditions.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Number of Key Features for Which Correlation Between Pupillometric Variables and Concentration in Plasma Over Time is Significant for Each Medicinal Product D1-D4 and Ambient Light Condition.
For each medicinal product (D1-D4), number of significant correlations between key features and plasma concentration over time using refined pupillograms. A key feature represents an eye characteristic (such as pupil size, iris position, and the similar). A key feature is considered "correlated" if the slope in a linear regression is significantly different from zero (p\<0.05). The term correlated over time refers to data collected during 5 hours at Visit 2 after administration of D1-D4. Key features were available from two conditions, one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in dim ambient light (50 Lux) and one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in bright ambient light (500 Lux). The Outcome Measure is reported for both ambient light conditions.
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Number of Key Features With Change From Baseline to 5 Hours After Administration of Medicinal Product, Using Refined Pupillograms.
For each medicinal product (D1-D4), number of changed key features from baseline to 5 hours after administration of medicinal product at visit 2 using refined pupillograms. A key feature represents an eye characteristic (such as pupil size, iris position, and the similar). A key feature is considered "changed" if the difference between averages at baseline and at 5 hours is significant (p\<0.05). Key features were available from two conditions, one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in dim ambient light (50 Lux) and one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in bright ambient light (500 Lux). The Outcome Measure is reported for both ambient light conditions.
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Number of Correct Classifications of Subjects, Evaluated Using a Combination of Different Pupillometric Variables for Indicating Use of Each Medicinal Product D1-D4 and Ambient Light Condition.
For each medicinal product (D1-D4), evaluate known combinations of key features that changes from baseline to the LC-MS/MS verified peak concentration in plasma after administration of medicinal product at visit 2 using refined pupillograms. A key feature represents an eye characteristic (such as pupil size, iris position, and the similar). A combination of key features collected at peak plasma concentration was used to build a logistic regression classifier, and the resulting counts of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives are presented. Key features were available from two conditions, one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in dim ambient light (50 Lux) and one condition where pupillograms and corresponding key features were collected in bright ambient light (500 Lux). The Outcome Measure is reported for both ambient light conditions. Key feature values were missing in a few instances, as shown in the table.
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 1
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 1. How would you grade the instructions for use? Response options: * Not understandable * Could only understand some parts * Could understand most parts * Could understand almost every part * Fully understandable
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 2
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 2. Was Previct Drugs easy to use correctly based on the information in the Instructions For Use (IFU)? Response options: * Yes * No
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 4
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 4. How did you experience the verbal instructions during a test with Previct Drugs? Response options: * Very easy to understand * Easy to understand * Nor easy or difficult to understand * Difficult to understand * Very difficult to understand
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 5
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 5. Before starting a test, the App prompted you with a few written instructions. Did you read the instructions? Response options: * Yes * No
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 7
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 7. How did you experience performing a test with Previct Drugs (from opening of the App until the test was completed)? Response options: * Very easy to perform * Easy to perform * Nor easy or difficult to perform * Difficult to perform * Very difficult to perform
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 8
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 8. During a test with Previct Drugs, did you at any time have to tilt the mobile against something to be able to perform a measurement? Response options: * Yes * No
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 9
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 9. If Yes (to question 8), how often did you have to tilt the mobile against something: Response options: * One occasion * Several occasions * Most occasions * All occasions
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 10
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 10. According to you, how many minutes did a test with Previct Drugs take in general? From start to end. Response options: * \< 5 minutes * 5-7 minutes * \> 7 minutes
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 11
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 11. Did you receive a notification when it was time for a test with Previct Drugs? Response options: * Yes * Most of the times * I did not receive any notifications
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 12
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 12. Did you notice any issues during usage of Previct Drugs? Response options: * No * Yes
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 13
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 13. Did you require any assistance from the study personnel (e.g., through phone) during the usage of Previct Drugs? Response options: * Yes * No
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 15
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 15. If Yes (to question 13), how often did you require assistance? Response options: * One occasion * Several occasions * Most occasions * All occasions
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 16
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 16. When starting a measurement, how was your experience finding the right conditions to start the measurement? Response options: * Very easy * Easy * Nor easy or difficult * Difficult * Very difficult
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 18
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 18. How did you experience performing a Nystagmus (look to your extreme right and left) test? Response options: * Very easy to perform * Easy to perform * Nor easy or difficult to perform * Difficult to perform * Very difficult to perform
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 20
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 20. According to you, how many minutes did a Nystagmus test take (from starting test until analyzed)? Response options: * \< 1 minute * 1-2 minutes * \> 3 minutes
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 21
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 21. How often did you have to redo a Nystagmus test? Response options: * No occasion * One occasion * Several occasions * Most occasions * All occasions
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 23
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 23. In general, how easy is it for you to cross your eyes? Response options: * Very easy * Easy * Nor easy or difficult * Difficult * Very difficult
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 24
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 24. How did you experience performing a Cross Eyes test? Response options: * Very easy to perform * Easy to perform * Nor easy or difficult to perform * Difficult to perform * Very difficult to perform
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 26
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 26. According to you, how many minutes did a Cross Eyes test take (from starting until analyzed)? Response options: * \< 1 minute * 1-2 minutes * \> 3 minutes
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 27
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 27. How often did you have to redo a Cross Eyes test? Response options: * No occasion * One occasion * Several occasions * Most occasions * All occasions
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 29
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 29. How did you experience performing a Contraction test? Response options: * Very easy to perform * Easy to perform * Nor easy or difficult to perform * Difficult to perform * Very difficult to perform
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 31
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 31. How was your experience turning your mobile when asked to? Response options: * Very easy to perform * Easy to perform * Nor easy or difficult to perform * Difficult to perform * Very difficult to perform
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 33
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 33. According to you, how many minutes did a Contraction test take (from starting test until analyzed)? Response options: * \< 1 minute * 1-2 minutes * \> 3 minutes
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)
Usability Questionnaire - Question 34
User-friendliness of Previct Drugs evaluated by the subject at visit 2. Question 34. How often did you have to redo a Contraction test? Response options: * No occasion * One occasion * Several occasions * Most occasions * All occasions
Time frame: Day 7 +/- 2 days (Visit 2)