The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of comprehensive multimodal individually tailored Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Cognitive Rehabilitation Therapy (CRT), and modifiable lifestyle sessions. The study team hypothesizes that combining evidence-based cognitive and affective therapies with lifestyle modifications is feasible and will improve the community integration (CI) and Quality of life (QoL) in patients with a neurocognitive disorder compared to usual care.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
15
Participants that score 1-1.5 standard deviation (SD) below the norm for age and education on 2 cognitive domains will receive an intensive program, 2 CRT sessions per week for 4 weeks in addition to 1 CBT session per week for 8 weeks. Based on clinical experience, those with more severe cognitive deficits require more time to achieve their therapy goals, whereas those with mild deficits can tolerate a more intense therapy. Participants that score 1.5-2 SD or more below the norm for age and education on 2 cognitive domains will receive 1 CRT and 1 CBT weekly sessions for 8 weeks. All the CRT sessions will be coupled with homework for 8 weeks. All research-related sessions will be web-based (on Zoom) and recorded (with approval).
Participants that score 1-1.5 standard deviation (SD) below the norm for age and education on 2 cognitive domains will receive an intensive program, 2 CRT sessions per week for 4 weeks in addition to 1 CBT session per week for 8 weeks. Based on clinical experience, those with more severe cognitive deficits require more time to achieve their therapy goals, whereas those with mild deficits can tolerate a more intense therapy. Participants that score 1.5-2 SD or more below the norm for age and education on 2 cognitive domains will receive 1 CRT and 1 CBT weekly sessions for 8 weeks. All the CRT sessions will be coupled with homework for 8 weeks. All research-related sessions will be web-based (on Zoom) and recorded (with approval).
The therapy sessions are coupled with homework and requires some lifestyle modifications such lifestyle adjustments are using a calendar, a diary, maintaining a sleep schedule and exercise.
Participants will receive 15 minute psychoeducation session twice per week for 8 weeks. All research-related sessions will be web-based (on Zoom) and recorded (with approval).
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Number of patients that complete the study
Time frame: week 8 (end of treatment)
Average number of sessions completed
Time frame: week 8 (end of treatment)
Overall experience based qualitative semi-structured interview
This interview will be conducted at the end of the study and in the order of exit of participants to gather feedback about their satisfaction with the study. This brief interview consists of 3 questions that ask the participants to describe the aspects of the intervention participants found beneficial, willingness to participate again, and whether it was appropriate for participants needs. In addition, a brief quantitative satisfaction survey to rate overall satisfaction, how likely it would be recommend to others, and how satisfied participants are with telemedicine as a mode of delivery.
Time frame: Week 9 (after treatment ended)
The Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) Score
This questionnaire contains 15 items to evaluate the degree of integration into each of the three area of home, social network, and productive activities. The overall score, which represents a summation of the home integration score plus social integration score plus productivity score, can range from 0 to 29. A high score indicates greater integration, and a low score reflects less integration.
Time frame: Week 9 (after treatment ended)
The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
The SF-36 explores people's physical and mental health. It consists of 36 items that assess role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, general health perceptions, perceived change in health. Scores ranged from 0 (worst health status) to 100 (best health status).
Time frame: Week 9 (after treatment ended)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was designed as a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive dysfunction. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. Time to administer the MoCA is approximately 10 minutes. The total possible score is 30 points; a score of 26 or above is considered normal.
Time frame: Week 9 (after treatment ended)
The Symbol Digit Modalities Test Score (SDMT-5 minutes)
The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is used to assess divided attention, visual scanning, tracking and motor speed. Using a reference key, the examinee has 90 seconds to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures. Because examinees can give either written or spoken responses, the test is well suited for use with individuals who have motor disabilities or speech disorders. Because it involves only geometric figures and numbers, the SDMT is relatively culture free as well and can be administered to individuals who do not speak English. It takes approximately 5 minutes to complete the entire test. Scoring involves summing the number of correct substitutions within the 90 second interval the max score is 110, where a higher score indicates a better memory.
Time frame: Week 9 (after treatment ended)
Brief Visuospatial Memory test (BVMT-R-25 minutes)
This test is comprised of three memory trials (10 seconds each) followed by delayed recall after 25 minutes and a recognition trial. It has been widely used as a quick measure of visuospatial memory. The digital stimulus forms will be used (alternate form will be used at the end of the study to control for practice effect). Recall performance will record for each of the immediate recall trials (Trial 1, Trial 2, and Trial 3) and for the delayed recall trial (Delayed Recall). The study team will combine the recall scores to form three additional summary measures of learning and memory. Recognition Hits and False Alarms will be recorded during the delayed recognition task. Recognition Hits are calculated as the number of correct responses to target items, and Recognition False Alarms are calculated as the number of incorrect responses to nontarget items. Each trial is worth 0-12 points, so the total score is 0-36, a higher score indicates a better memory.
Time frame: Week 9 (after treatment ended)
California Verbal Learning Test-Third Edition (CVLT-3-60 minutes)
The California Verbal Learning Test, Third Edition (CVLT-3) measures both recall and recognition of two lists of words (List A and List B) over a number of immediate and delayed memory trials. It provides an assessment of verbal learning and memory deficits in adults ages 16 - 90. Score of 0-16, where a lower score indicates worse memory, and a high score indicates better memory.
Time frame: Week 9 (after treatment ended)
The Memory Complaint Scale (MCS-2 minute) score
The Memory Complaint Scale (MCS-2 min) is comprised of 14 items and is designed for subjective memory complaints.The test yields a total score with a classification in terms of memory complaint (MC) based on their score as follows: No MC (0-2), mild MC (3-6), moderate MC (7-10) or severe MC (11-14).
Time frame: Week 9 (after treatment ended)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.