A Prospective, Single-center, Single-blind, Randomized split-face, controlled trial will be conducted. The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and satisfaction of ultrasound therapy combined with SkinCeuticals A.G.E in improving facial aging, and to explore the medical value of ultrasound therapy combined with SkinCeuticals A.G.E. Participants will be treated with ultrasound combined with SkinCeuticals A.G.E on one randomized side face and ultrasound combined with standard cream on the other side.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
50
Ultrasound therapy combined with SkinCeuticals A.G.E + conventional moisturizing and sunscreen.
Ultrasound therapy combined with standard cream + conventional moisturizing and sunscreen
Hang Zhou YesSkin Hospital
Hangzhou, China
RECRUITINGGlobal aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) score
Investigator Satisfaction Assessment Form. Scoring criteria: 5 (very much improved), 4 (marked improvement), 3 (improved), 2 (no change), or 1 (worse).
Time frame: at day 90 after procedure
Change from baseline in fine lines score
Skin Parameter Assessment Form. Fine lines: Grading was performed on a Griffith 's scale (10-point scale) with different scores representing: 0 (no fine lines/wrinkles, skin completely smooth and no wrinkles); 1-3 (mild, few fine lines and wrinkles, and distant intervals within the treatment area); 4-6 (moderate, moderate number of fine lines/wrinkles within the treatment area and close to each other); and 7-9 (severe, dense clusters of fine lines/wrinkles within the treatment area). Fine lines status should be evaluated by an independent investigator.
Time frame: at 30, 60, 90, 180 days after procedure
Relative change from baseline in skin elasticity
Time frame: at 30, 60, 90, 180 days after procedure
Relative change from baseline in dermal thickness
Time frame: at 30, 60, 90, 180 days after procedure
Relative change in transepidermal water loss(TEWL) from baseline
Time frame: at 30, 60, 90, 180 days after procedure
Investigator satisfaction assessment
Investigator Satisfaction Assessment Form. Questions included: 1. Integrated skincare effect of ultrasonic program. 2, Feeling overall improvement of facial wrinkles after using the product. 3, Feeling that the elasticity of facial skin is improved after using the product. 4, Feeling that facial skin fullness improved after using the product. 5. Feeling that the skin moisture is improved after using the product. Satisfaction ratings were divided into: 1: very dissatisfied, 2: dissatisfied, 3: fair, 4: satisfied, and 5: very satisfied, and the proportion of people in each rating was statistically summarized
Time frame: at 30, 60, 90, 180 days after surgery
Subject satisfaction evaluation
Subject Satisfaction Assessment Form. Questions included: 1. Integrated skincare effect of ultrasonic program. 2, Feeling overall improvement of facial wrinkles after using the product. 3, Feeling that the elasticity of facial skin is improved after using the product. 4, Feeling that facial skin fullness improved after using the product. 5. Feeling that the skin moisture is improved after using the product. Satisfaction ratings were divided into: 1: very dissatisfied, 2: dissatisfied, 3: fair, 4: satisfied, and 5: very satisfied, and the proportion of people in each rating was statistically summarized
Time frame: at 30, 60, 90, 180 days after procedure
Global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) score
Investigator Satisfaction Assessment Form. Scoring criteria: 5 (very much improved), 4 (marked improvement), 3 (improved), 2 (no change), or 1 (worse).
Time frame: at day 30,60,180 after procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.