The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the postoperative outcomes based on superficial temporal versus cervical recipient vessels for midface and scalp advanced oncologic defects using free tissue flap for reconstruction. The main question it aims to answer is: • Which recipient vessel is most suitable for performing microanastomosis using free flaps for advanced midface and scalp oncologic defect. Participants will be undergo resection of advanced malignant tumors of the midface and scalp with subsequent oncological reconstruction using free tissue flap. Researchers will compare two groups where those in whom superficial temporal vessels will be used as the recipient vessels (group A) and those in whom cervical vessels will be used as the recipient vessels (group B) to see if there is a recipient vessel who is most suitable for performing microanastomosis using free flaps for advanced midface and scalp oncologic defect.
Advanced oncologic defects of the midface and scalp are a significant challenge to the reconstructive head neck surgeon, who must consider the need for midfacial projection, rehabilitation, and function restoration. Free flaps reconstruction in the midface and scalp region are the gold standard for advanced cases. There is no consensus in the literature on which recipient vessel is most suitable for performing microanastomosis using free flaps for advanced midface and scalp oncologic defect. The aim of this clinical trial is prospectively compare the results of microvascular flap reconstruction of midface and scalp advanced oncologic defects using superficial temporal versus cervical as recipient vessels. This is a parallel trial with permuted block randomization of patients who will be undergone a midface and scalp oncologic reconstruction with free tissue flap. Two groups will be analyzed: those in whom superficial temporal vessels will be used as the recipient vessels (group A) and those in whom cervical vessels will be used as the recipient vessels (group B). Allocation ratio will de 1:1 participants. Patient gender and age, cause and localization of the defect, flap choice for reconstruction, recipient vessels, intraoperative outcome, postoperative course, and complications were recorded and analyzed. Considering that this is a disease with rare staging, the calculated sample size was 26, but it will be increased by 30% (total of 34 participants who will be selected) since the death rate of these patients ranges from 8-25% A Fisher's exact test will be used to compare outcomes between the 2 groups.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
32
Free tissue flaps harvesting and microanastomosis were performed by the same surgeon and in a similar way in both group. Postoperative course, and complications were recorded and analyzed.
Brazilian National Cancer Institute
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
To compare the overall flap survival rate after the microanastomosis
Adequate perfusion of the free tissue flap was assessed using Doppler flowmetry, flap bleeding time after puncture, color, texture and turgor. Both venous and arterial thrombosis were evaluated by these methods in order to detect whether there was any evidence of low or absence of vascular perfusion of the flap.
Time frame: Participants were assessed twice a day for the first 10 days after the intervention and then weekly for 4 weeks.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.